| 1. |
- Mazur, Mikael, 1990, et al.
(författare)
-
Field Trial of FPGA-Based Real-Time Sensing Transceiver over 524km of Live Aerial Fiber
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Optical Fiber Communication Conference, OFC 2023. - 9781957171180
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- We perform fiber sensing over a 524 km live network using a real-time coherent transceiver prototype. Polarization and length changes from the link consisting exclusively of aerial fiber wound around high-voltage power cables are continuously monitored.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Aidanpää, Jan-Olov, et al.
(författare)
-
Developments in rotor dynamical modeling of hydropower units
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium on Emerging Trends in Rotor Dynamics. - Dordrecht : Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology/Springer Verlag. - 9789400700192
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 4. |
- Cöster, Maria C., et al.
(författare)
-
Validation of Two Foot and Ankle Scores – SEFAS (Self-reported Foot And Ankle Score) and AOFAS
- 2014
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) is for many foot and ankle surgeons the gold standard for evaluation of foot and ankle disorders. The score comprises of four different questionnaires depending on which region is evaluated, and covers three different constructs; pain, function and range of motion and alignment. AOFAS however, requires clinical examination, and can therefore not be used as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). In contrast, the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) is a PROM that recently has been validated with good results in patients with foot and ankle disorders. The SEFAS contains 12 questions and covers different constructs such as pain, function and limitation of function. The aim of this study was to compare the SEFAS and AOFAS in patients with disorders in the great toe, the hindfoot and ankle, taking psychometric properties for scores into account.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The SEFAS and AOFAS scores were completed by 73 patients with disorders in the great toe and by 89 patients with disorders in the hindfoot or ankle. The time it took to complete the questionnaire was measured in 17 patients. In all patients, construct validity for SEFAS versus AOFAS was estimated by Spearman´s correlation coefficient and we also evaluated if there were any floor and ceiling effects. Test-retest reliability (intra-observer reliability) was measured for SEFAS in 68 patients and for AOFAS in 33 patients with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Inter-observer reliability was calculated in nine patients for AOFAS using ICC. Responsiveness, i.e. the ability of a score to detect changes after a surgical intervention, was estimated by effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) in 120 patients for SEFAS and in 112 patients for AOFAS.RESULTS: The SEFAS was completed more than three times faster than AOFAS (165 seconds versus 515 seconds). SEFAS had good convergent validity (strong correlation) with AOFAS with a Spearman´s correlation coefficient of 0.64 in patients with great toe disorders and 0.65 in patients with hind foot/ankle disorders. There were no floor or ceiling effects in either of the scores. ICC was in patients with great toe disorders 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-0.97) for SEFAS and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.39-0.93) for AOFAS, and in patients with hindfoot/ankle disorders 0.92 (95%CI: 0.85-0.95) for SEFAS and 0.52 (95%CI: 0.13-0.77) for AOFAS. ES was 1.4 for SEFAS and 1.8 for AOFAS and SRM 1.4 for SEFAS and 1.6 for AOFAS in patients with great toe disorders. ES was 1.2 for SEFAS and 1.1 for AOFAS and SRM 1.1 for SEFAS and 0.9 for AOFAS in patients with hindfoot/ ankle disorders. Inter-observer reliability was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.0-0.84) for AOFAS.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In this study there was a strong correlation between SEFAS and AOFAS indicating good construct validity for SEFAS. Both scores had good responsiveness and no floor or ceiling effects. The test-retest reliability was better for SEFAS than AOFAS while the inter-observer reliability was low for AOFAS. Finally, SEFAS was completed three times faster than AOFAS. In conclusion we consider SEFAS at least equal to AOFAS for evaluation of patients with foot and ankle disorders, and as no clinical examination is demanded in SEFAS, it is an ideal instrument for evaluation of clinical patient outcome in national registers.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Karlsson, P, et al.
(författare)
-
Low-Density Cellulose-Based Foams: Preparation, Characterization and Biodegradation
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Book of Abstracts EPNOE 2023. - : Graz University of Technology. ; , s. 345-
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The demands for alternatives to fossil-based materials for the packaging and building sector is rapidly increasing as new regulations and laws are set. The usage of such materials in low- density applications is increasingly questioned since only a small amount is recycled and a large part ends up in the environment where it has a very long decomposition time and contributes to the emergence of microplastics in our marine eco systems. Alternatives to fossil- based low-density materials has been demonstrated using e.g., starch [1] and cellulose [2] as raw materials. However, challenges remain regarding the process parameters and properties such as strength and water integrity. To fulfil these properties requested by the specification owners, understanding is needed regarding which tools that are available for incorporating wet-integrity and hydrophobicity without causing the wet foam to collapse during the foaming or drying process. It is also of highest importance to have an early understanding of how such materials can be recycled and/or bio-degraded to fit a circular economy. In this study two different cross-linkers and two different types of hydrophobisers are used to obtain a wet stable and a water repelling low-density material. The wet foams are characterized by measuring the foamability and foam stability and the dry foams are characterized in terms of structure, porosity and degradability. Two demonstrators have been produced based on the most promising material composition and the up-scaling processes of the developed foaming technology to both batch-wise and continuous fabrication of composite foams is underway. Finally, a biodegradation study was conducted and evaluated.[1] S. Chaireh, P. Ngasatool, and K. Kaewtatip, “Novel composite foam made from starch and water hyacinth with beeswax coating for food packaging applications,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol., vol. 165, pp. 1382–1391, 2020[2] C. Qin, M. Yao, Y. Liu, Y. Yang, Y. Zong, and H. Zhao, “MFC/NFC-based foam/aerogel for production of porous materials: Preparation, properties and applications,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 23, pp. 1–21, 2020
|
|
| 10. |
- Mazur, Mikael, 1990, et al.
(författare)
-
Dual-Comb Swept Wavelength Interferometry
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Optics InfoBase Conference Papers. - 2162-2701. ; 2020-May
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- We demonstrate a hybrid swept wavelength interferometry-dual-comb spectroscopy system for fast broadband full-field measurements. Phase and amplitude retrieval is experimentally verified and compensation of laser sweep nonlinearity is demonstrated without external referencing.
|
|
