| 1. |
- Huber, Jürgen, et al.
(författare)
-
The impact of a financial transaction tax on stylized facts of price returns-Evidence from the lab
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control. - : Elsevier BV. - 0165-1889. ; 36:8, s. 1248-1266
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- As the introduction of financial transaction taxes is increasingly discussed by political leaders we explore possible consequences such taxes could have on markets. Here we examine how "stylized facts", namely fat tails and volatility clustering, are affected by different tax regimes in laboratory experiments. We find that leptokurtosis of price returns is highest and clustered volatility is weakest in unilaterally taxed markets (where tax havens exist). Instead, tails are slimmest and volatility clustering is strongest in tax havens. When an encompassing financial transaction tax is levied, stylized facts hardly change compared to a scenario with no tax on all markets. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 2. |
- Kleinlercher, D., et al.
(författare)
-
The impact of different incentive schemes on asset prices
- 2014
-
Ingår i: European Economic Review. - : Elsevier BV. - 0014-2921. ; 68, s. 137-150
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- How people are incentivized is one of the main drivers of how they behave. In laboratory asset markets we evaluate the impact of four trader incentive bonus, bonus with cap, linear, and penalty - on asset prices and trader behavior. We find that (i) an asset with identical expected dividend shows price levels which differ by more than 100 percent depending on the incentive scheme subjects face. In particular, prices of markets populated by subjects with bonus incentives show the highest prices, whereas those with penalty-like incentivized subjects exhibit the lowest. (ii) However, subjects act approximately rational as different incentives generate different optimal price levels. (iii) In markets where different subjects have different incentive schemes we find that those with bonus incentives exhibit a riskier investment behavior and prefer the riskier asset, whereas subjects with penalty incentives invest conservatively and mainly hold cash. Since we find no difference in risk attitude of subjects prior to the experiment, differences in investment behavior are induced by the applied incentives. Our results highlight that incentives on financial markets have a huge impact on asset prices and investment behavior. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
|
|
