SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Klein F.) ;lar1:(liu)"

Sökning: WFRF:(Klein F.) > Linköpings universitet

  • Resultat 1-10 av 15
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  •  
2.
  • Klionsky, Daniel J., et al. (författare)
  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy
  • 2012
  • Ingår i: Autophagy. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1554-8635 .- 1554-8627. ; 8:4, s. 445-544
  • Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
    • In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  • Ekhtiari, Hamed, et al. (författare)
  • A methodological checklist for fMRI drug cue reactivity studies : development and expert consensus
  • 2022
  • Ingår i: Nature Protocols. - : Nature Portfolio. - 1754-2189 .- 1750-2799. ; 17:3, s. 567-595
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Cue reactivity measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging is used in studies of substance-use disorders. This Consensus Statement is the result of a Delphi process to arrive at parameters that should be reported in describing these studies. Cue reactivity is one of the most frequently used paradigms in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of substance use disorders (SUDs). Although there have been promising results elucidating the neurocognitive mechanisms of SUDs and SUD treatments, the interpretability and reproducibility of these studies is limited by incomplete reporting of participants characteristics, task design, craving assessment, scanning preparation and analysis decisions in fMRI drug cue reactivity (FDCR) experiments. This hampers clinical translation, not least because systematic review and meta-analysis of published work are difficult. This consensus paper and Delphi study aims to outline the important methodological aspects of FDCR research, present structured recommendations for more comprehensive methods reporting and review the FDCR literature to assess the reporting of items that are deemed important. Forty-five FDCR scientists from around the world participated in this study. First, an initial checklist of items deemed important in FDCR studies was developed by several members of the Enhanced NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analyses (ENIGMA) Addiction working group on the basis of a systematic review. Using a modified Delphi consensus method, all experts were asked to comment on, revise or add items to the initial checklist, and then to rate the importance of each item in subsequent rounds. The reporting status of the items in the final checklist was investigated in 108 recently published FDCR studies identified through a systematic review. By the final round, 38 items reached the consensus threshold and were classified under seven major categories: Participants Characteristics, General fMRI Information, General Task Information, Cue Information, Craving Assessment Inside Scanner, Craving Assessment Outside Scanner and Pre- and Post-Scanning Considerations. The review of the 108 FDCR papers revealed significant gaps in the reporting of the items considered important by the experts. For instance, whereas items in the General fMRI Information category were reported in 90.5% of the reviewed papers, items in the Pre- and Post-Scanning Considerations category were reported by only 44.7% of reviewed FDCR studies. Considering the notable and sometimes unexpected gaps in the reporting of items deemed to be important by experts in any FDCR study, the protocols could benefit from the adoption of reporting standards. This checklist, a living document to be updated as the field and its methods advance, can help improve experimental design, reporting and the widespread understanding of the FDCR protocols. This checklist can also provide a sample for developing consensus statements for protocols in other areas of task-based fMRI.
  •  
5.
  • Heil, J., et al. (författare)
  • Preoperative portal vein or portal and hepatic vein embolization: DRAGON collaborative group analysis
  • 2021
  • Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : OXFORD UNIV PRESS. - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 108:7, s. 834-842
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Y Background: The extent of liver resection for tumours is limited by the expected functional reserve of the future liver remnant (FRL), so hypertrophy may be induced by portal vein embolization (PVE), taking 6 weeks or longer for growth. This study assessed the hypothesis that simultaneous embolization of portal and hepatic veins (PVE/HVE) accelerates hypertrophy and improves resectability. Methods: All centres of the international DRAGON trials study collaborative were asked to provide data on patients who had PVE/HVE or PVE on 2016-2019 (more than 5 PVE/HVE procedures was a requirement). Liver volumetry was performed using OsiriX MD software. Multivariable analysis was performed for the endpoints of resectability rate, FLR hypertrophy and major complications using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) statistics, regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: In total, 39 patients had undergone PVE/HVE and 160 had PVE alone. The PVE/HVE group had better hypertrophy than the PVE group (59 versus 48 per cent respectively; P=0.020) and resectability (90 versus 68 per cent; P=0.007). Major complications (26 versus 34 per cent; P=0.550) and 90-day mortality (3 versus 16 per cent respectively, P = 0.065) were comparable. Multivariable analysis confirmed that these effects were independent of confounders. Conclusion: PVE/HVE achieved better FLR hypertrophy and resectability than PVE in this collaborative experience.
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  • Klein, T., et al. (författare)
  • Metal-insulator transition and superconductivity in boron-doped diamond
  • 2007
  • Ingår i: Physical Review B. Condensed Matter and Materials Physics. - 1098-0121 .- 1550-235X. ; 75:165313
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • We report on a detailed analysis of the transport properties and superconducting critical temperatures of boron-doped diamond films grown along the {100} direction. The system presents a metal-insulator transition (MIT) for a boron concentration (nB) on the order of nc~4.5×1020  cm−3, in excellent agreement with numerical calculations. The temperature dependence of the conductivity and Hall effect can be well described by variable range hopping for nB<nc with a characteristic hopping temperature T0 strongly reduced due to the proximity of the MIT. All metallic samples (i.e., for nB>nc) present a superconducting transition at low temperature. The zero-temperature conductivity 0 deduced from fits to the data above the critical temperature (Tc) using a classical quantum interference formula scales as 0(nB/nc−1) with ~1. Large Tc values (0.4  K) have been obtained for boron concentration down to nB/nc~1.1 and Tc surprisingly mimics a (nB/nc−1)1/2 law. Those high Tc values can be explained by a slow decrease of the electron-phonon coupling parameter and a corresponding drop of the Coulomb pseudopotential µ* as nBnc.
  •  
8.
  • ODonnell, Michael, et al. (författare)
  • Registered Replication Report: Dijksterhuis and van Knippenberg (1998)
  • 2018
  • Ingår i: Perspectives on Psychological Science. - : SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD. - 1745-6916 .- 1745-6924. ; 13:2, s. 268-294
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Dijksterhuis and van Knippenberg (1998) reported that participants primed with a category associated with intelligence (professor) subsequently performed 13% better on a trivia test than participants primed with a category associated with a lack of intelligence (soccer hooligans). In two unpublished replications of this study designed to verify the appropriate testing procedures, Dijksterhuis, van Knippenberg, and Holland observed a smaller difference between conditions (2%-3%) as well as a gender difference: Men showed the effect (9.3% and 7.6%), but women did not (0.3% and -0.3%). The procedure used in those replications served as the basis for this multilab Registered Replication Report. A total of 40 laboratories collected data for this project, and 23 of these laboratories met all inclusion criteria. Here we report the meta-analytic results for those 23 direct replications (total N = 4,493), which tested whether performance on a 30-item general-knowledge trivia task differed between these two priming conditions (results of supplementary analyses of the data from all 40 labs, N = 6,454, are also reported). We observed no overall difference in trivia performance between participants primed with the professor category and those primed with the hooligan category (0.14%) and no moderation by gender.
  •  
9.
  • Sangchooli, Arshiya, et al. (författare)
  • Parameter Space and Potential for Biomarker Development in 25 Years of fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity
  • 2024
  • Ingår i: JAMA psychiatry. - : AMER MEDICAL ASSOC. - 2168-6238 .- 2168-622X.
  • Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Importance In the last 25 years, functional magnetic resonance imaging drug cue reactivity (FDCR) studies have characterized some core aspects in the neurobiology of drug addiction. However, no FDCR-derived biomarkers have been approved for treatment development or clinical adoption. Traversing this translational gap requires a systematic assessment of the FDCR literature evidence, its heterogeneity, and an evaluation of possible clinical uses of FDCR-derived biomarkers. Objective To summarize the state of the field of FDCR, assess their potential for biomarker development, and outline a clear process for biomarker qualification to guide future research and validation efforts. Evidence Review The PubMed and Medline databases were searched for every original FDCR investigation published from database inception until December 2022. Collected data covered study design, participant characteristics, FDCR task design, and whether each study provided evidence that might potentially help develop susceptibility, diagnostic, response, prognostic, predictive, or severity biomarkers for 1 or more addictive disorders. Findings There were 415 FDCR studies published between 1998 and 2022. Most focused on nicotine (122 [29.6%]), alcohol (120 [29.2%]), or cocaine (46 [11.1%]), and most used visual cues (354 [85.3%]). Together, these studies recruited 19 311 participants, including 13 812 individuals with past or current substance use disorders. Most studies could potentially support biomarker development, including diagnostic (143 [32.7%]), treatment response (141 [32.3%]), severity (84 [19.2%]), prognostic (30 [6.9%]), predictive (25 [5.7%]), monitoring (12 [2.7%]), and susceptibility (2 [0.5%]) biomarkers. A total of 155 interventional studies used FDCR, mostly to investigate pharmacological (67 [43.2%]) or cognitive/behavioral (51 [32.9%]) interventions; 141 studies used FDCR as a response measure, of which 125 (88.7%) reported significant interventional FDCR alterations; and 25 studies used FDCR as an intervention outcome predictor, with 24 (96%) finding significant associations between FDCR markers and treatment outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance Based on this systematic review and the proposed biomarker development framework, there is a pathway for the development and regulatory qualification of FDCR-based biomarkers of addiction and recovery. Further validation could support the use of FDCR-derived measures, potentially accelerating treatment development and improving diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive clinical judgments.
  •  
10.
  • Cauchoix, M., et al. (författare)
  • The repeatability of cognitive performance : a meta-analysis
  • 2018
  • Ingår i: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences. - : The Royal Society. - 0962-8436 .- 1471-2970. ; 373:1756
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Behavioural and cognitive processes play important roles in mediating an individual's interactions with its environment. Yet, while there is a vast literature on repeatable individual differences in behaviour, relatively little is known about the repeatability of cognitive performance. To further our understanding of the evolution of cognition, we gathered 44 studies on individual performance of 25 species across six animal classes and used meta-analysis to assess whether cognitive performance is repeatable. We compared repeatability (R) in performance (1) on the same task presented at different times (temporal repeatability), and (2) on different tasks that measured the same putative cognitive ability (contextual repeatability). We also addressed whether R estimates were influenced by seven extrinsic factors (moderators): type of cognitive performance measurement, type of cognitive task, delay between tests, origin of the subjects, experimental context, taxonomic class and publication status. We found support for both temporal and contextual repeatability of cognitive performance, with mean R estimates ranging between 0.15 and 0.28. Repeatability estimates were mostly influenced by the type of cognitive performance measures and publication status. Our findings highlight the widespread occurrence of consistent inter-individual variation in cognition across a range of taxa which, like behaviour, may be associated with fitness outcomes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Causes and consequences of individual differences in cognitive abilities'.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 15
Typ av publikation
tidskriftsartikel (13)
forskningsöversikt (2)
Typ av innehåll
refereegranskat (14)
övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt (1)
Författare/redaktör
Zhao, Y. (2)
Saito, T (2)
Moreau, D (2)
Tinghög, Gustav, 197 ... (2)
Jakobsson, J. (2)
Bozhkov, Peter (2)
visa fler...
Västfjäll, Daniel, 1 ... (2)
Heinz, Andreas (2)
Mitkidis, P (2)
Ross, RM (2)
Spanagel, Rainer (2)
Witkiewitz, Katie (2)
Levy, N (2)
Hanlon, Colleen A. (2)
Nilsonne, Gustav, 19 ... (2)
Beck, Anne (2)
Negoita, F. (2)
London, Edythe D. (2)
Sinha, Rajita (2)
Verdejo-Garcia, Anto ... (2)
Grodin, Erica N. (2)
Smolka, Michael N. (2)
Ekhtiari, Hamed (2)
Zare-Bidoky, Mehran (2)
Sangchooli, Arshiya (2)
Janes, Amy C. (2)
Kaufman, Marc J. (2)
Oliver, Jason A. (2)
Prisciandaro, James ... (2)
Bach, Patrick (2)
Baldacchino, Alex (2)
Bjork, James M. (2)
Childress, Anna Rose (2)
Claus, Eric D. (2)
Courtney, Kelly E. (2)
Ebrahimi, Mohsen (2)
Filbey, Francesca M. (2)
Ghahremani, Dara G. (2)
Goldstein, Rita Z. (2)
Joseph, Jane E. (2)
Kiefer, Falk (2)
Zonoozi, Arash Khoja ... (2)
Kober, Hedy (2)
Noori, Hamid R. (2)
Potvin, Stephane (2)
Steele, Vaughn R. (2)
Tapert, Susan F. (2)
Vollstaedt-Klein, Sa ... (2)
Wetherill, Reagan R. (2)
Wilson, Stephen J. (2)
visa färre...
Lärosäte
Karolinska Institutet (7)
Stockholms universitet (5)
Lunds universitet (2)
Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet (2)
Göteborgs universitet (1)
visa fler...
Umeå universitet (1)
Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (1)
visa färre...
Språk
Engelska (15)
Forskningsämne (UKÄ/SCB)
Naturvetenskap (7)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap (7)
Samhällsvetenskap (5)
Teknik (1)
Humaniora (1)

År

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy