| 1. |
- Eklöv Alander, Gunilla, et al.
(författare)
-
The construction of status in the auditor–audit committee relationship
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Auditing Transformation. - : Routledge. - 9781032533032 - 9781003411390 ; , s. 46-69
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This chapter investigates the construction of status in the relationship between the auditor and the audit committee. Such a study is merited considering that regulation as a driver of corporate governance has been designed towards a regulatory concern with lax audit practice, where the audit committee was presented as a solution. This is, however, a problem not manifested in the Swedish context. The driver was instead connected to the need for companies to follow suit with an Anglo-Saxon regulatory development. The study is informed by interviews with audit committee members and external auditors in large, listed companies and contributes novel insights to the understanding of the transformation of the role of the auditor due to the regulatory driver represented by the audit committees. The findings show a rather paradoxical development where the auditors increase their status through direct access to the board of directors, while also decreasing their status by being reduced to a supplier, among other suppliers of trust and comfort to the directors. The findings are of interest to accounting firms, as well as clients and investors, to recognise the transformation of the status of the auditor in spite of regulations to protect the role.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Jonnergård, Karin, et al.
(författare)
-
Corporate control and regulation : The explain mechanism as a sign of "capture"
- 2019
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Corporate governance regulation is a contested area. The dispersion of corporate governance codes could on the one hand be seen as a regulator capture performed by international institutional investors, but on the other hand as support for status quo favoring strong local interests, due to local adaptation of code content. In this paper, these competing explanations are empirically tested through the analysis of noncompliance in number of explanations by Swedish listed corporations with different corporate control arrangements. The main findings are that corporations with a concentrated “Swedish” control situation (i.e. controlling shareholder holding more than 50% of the votes) comply more with the code and provide significantly less explanations than other corporations, whereas corporations controlled by owners in the range of 20 to 50% (which would then represent the typical Swedish business group arrangement) comply less with the code and provide significantly more explanations, as do to some extent (but not as robustly) corporations with dispersed ownership (or an “Anglo-American” control situation). This indicates that the Swedish code through a series of adaptations of the international blueprint favors very strong local controlling shareholders. This is to some extent surprising, as the process of code development was set up to favor controlling shareholders with more moderate stakes. Nevertheless, it is of course to some extent logical that the code would also favor the strongest actors in the Swedish corporate governance system. Still, the strongest effect on code compliance (or not) seem to derive not from ownership concentration and type, but from board and CEO characteristics, traditionally associated with their relative power structure. These findings have implications for how corporate governance codes should be understood in a global setting and what roles such codes could perform in a reform process aiming to change corporate governance arrangements.
|
|
| 8. |
- Jonnergård, Karin, et al.
(författare)
-
Corporate control and regulation : The explain mechanism as a sign of "capture"
- 2019
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Corporate governance regulation is a contested area. The introduction of a corporate governance code could, on the one hand, be understood as a regulatory capture performed by international institutional investors, but on the other hand, as the introduction of a code tend to involve local adaptations it could be understood as support for status quo, and hence favoring strong local interest groups. In this paper, these competing explanations are empirically tested through the analysis of non-compliance by Swedish listed corporations with different corporate control arrangements. The main findings are that corporations with a concentrated “Swedish” control situation (i.e. controlling shareholder holding more than 50% of the votes) explain significantly more than corporations with other ownership arrangements, whereas corporations with dispersed ownership (“Anglo-American” control situation) explain significantly less. This could be interpreted as that the Swedish code - regardless of controlling shareholder involvement in the regulatory process - favor corporate governance arrangements based on dispersed ownership, and hence a control situation that international institutional investors are familiar with. These findings have implications for how corporate governance codes should be understood in a global setting and what roles such codes could perform in a reform process aiming to change corporate governance arrangements.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
