| 1. |
- Mercuri, E., et al.
(författare)
-
Safety and effectiveness of ataluren: comparison of results from the STRIDE Registry and CINRG DMD Natural History Study
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. - : Becaris Publishing Limited. - 2042-6305 .- 2042-6313. ; 9:5, s. 341-360
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim: Strategic Targeting of Registries and International Database of Excellence (STRIDE) is an ongoing, multicenter registry providing real-world evidence regarding ataluren use in patients with nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy (nmDMD). We examined the effectiveness of ataluren + standard of care (SoC) in the registry versus SoC alone in the Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group (CINRG) Duchenne Natural History Study (DNHS), DMD genotype-phenotype/-ataluren benefit correlations and ataluren safety. Patients & methods: Propensity score matching was performed to identify STRIDE and CINRG DNHS patients who were comparable in established disease progression predictors (registry cut-off date, 9 July 2018). Results & conclusion: Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated that ataluren + SoC significantly delayed age at loss of ambulation and age at worsening performance in timed function tests versus SoC alone (p <= 0.05). There were no DMD genotype-phenotype/ataluren benefit correlations. Ataluren was well tolerated. These results indicate that ataluren + SoC delays functional milestones of DMD progression in patients with nmDMD in routine clinical practice. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02369731. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02369731.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Fischbach, M., et al.
(författare)
-
Effect of peritoneal dialysis fluid composition on peritoneal area available for exchange in children
- 2004
-
Ingår i: Nephrol Dial Transplant. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0931-0509. ; 19:4, s. 925-32
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Although conventional peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDFs), such as Dianeal, are non-physiological in composition, new PDFs including Physioneal have a more neutral pH, are at least partially buffered with bicarbonate and, most importantly, contain low concentrations of glucose degradation products (GDPs). METHODS: To evaluate the impact of new PDFs in childcare, we performed a comparative crossover study with Dianeal and Physioneal. We examined both intraperitoneal pressure (IPP), which partly reflects pain induction, and the total pore area available for exchange, which indicates the number of capillaries perfused in the peritoneal membrane at any given moment and therefore partly reflects peritoneal dialysis capacity. The IPP was determined after inflow of 1000 ml/m(2) body surface area (BSA) of dialysate (intraperitoneal volume; IPV). The steady-state unrestricted area over diffusion distance (A(0)/ triangle up x, in cm(2)/cm per 1.73 m(2) BSA) was calculated from the three-pore theory. Six children were enrolled in the study. On the first day, two consecutive peritoneal equilibration tests of 90 min each were performed using first Dianeal and then Physioneal. On the second study day, the procedure was repeated with the fluids given in the opposite order. RESULTS: The mean IPP normalized to IPV (ml/m(2)) was significantly higher for Dianeal (9.5 +/- 0.9 cm/1000 ml/m(2)) than for Physioneal (7.9 +/- 1.2 cm/1000 ml/m(2), P < 0.01). The mean A(0)/ triangle up x was 17 +/- 4% larger with Dianeal (36 095 +/- 2009 cm(2)/cm per 1.73 m(2)) than with Physioneal (31 780 +/- 2185 cm(2)/cm per 1.73 m(2), P < 0.001; based on 24 data pairs). CONCLUSIONS: These pilot study results suggest a higher biocompatibility for Physioneal than for Dianeal. Less inflow pain associated with Physioneal induced a lower IPP reflecting enhanced fill volume tolerance, and the lower A(0)/ triangle up x reflected less capillary recruitment. Taken together, these results suggest that the new more biocompatible PDFs will improve peritoneal dialysis therapy, although this conclusion will require verification in extended clinical trials.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Fischbach, M., et al.
(författare)
-
The influence of peritoneal surface area on dialysis adequacy
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Perit Dial Int. - 0896-8608. ; 25 Suppl 3, s. S137-40
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In children, the prescription of peritoneal dialysis is based mainly on the choice of the peritoneal dialysis fluid, the intraperitoneal fill volume (mL/m2 body surface area (BSA)], and the contact time. The working mode of the peritoneal membrane as a dialysis membrane is more related to a dynamic complex structure than to a static hemodialyzer. Thus, the peritoneal surface area impacts on dialysis adequacy. In fact, the peritoneal surface area may be viewed as composed of three exchange entities: the anatomic area, the contact area, and the vascular area. First, in infants, the anatomic area appears to be two-fold larger than in adults when expressed per kilogram body weight. On the other hand, the anatomic area becomes independent of age when expressed per square meter BSA. Therefore, scaling of the intraperitoneal fill volume by BSA (m2) is necessary to prevent a too low ratio of fill volume to exchange area, which would result in a functional "hyperpermeable" peritoneal exchange. Second, the contact area, also called the wetted membrane, is only a portion of the anatomic area, representing 30% to 60% of this area in humans, as measured by computed tomography. Both posture and fill volume may affect the extent of recruitment of contact area. Finally, the vascular area is influenced by the availability of both the anatomic area and the recruited contact area. This surface is governed essentially by both peritonealvascular perfusion, represented by the mesenteric vascular flow and, hence, by the number of perfused capillaries available for exchange. This vascular area is dynamically affected by different factors, such as composition of the peritoneal fluid, the fill volume, and the production of inflammatory agents. Peritoneal dialysis fluids that will be developed in the future for children should allow an optimization of the fill volume owing to a better tolerance in terms of lower achieved intraperitoneal pressure for a given fill volume. Moreover, future peritoneal dialysis fluids should protect the peritoneal membrane from hyperperfusion (lower glucose degradation products).
|
|
| 6. |
- Fischbach, M., et al.
(författare)
-
The peritoneal membrane: a dynamic dialysis membrane in children
- 2003
-
Ingår i: Adv Perit Dial. ; 19, s. 265-8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Peritoneal dialysis prescription in children should be individualized--based not only on numerical targets (Kt/Vurea, Kcreat), but also on consideration of the peritoneal membrane, a dynamic dialysis membrane. In fact, the effective peritoneal surface area is at least a triple entity: an anatomic area, a contact area, and an exchange area. The anatomic area appears to be twice as large in infants as in adults if expressed per kilogram of body weight (BW), although the area is independent of age if expressed per square meter of body surface area (BSA). Therefore, scaling of the intraperitoneal fill volume (IPV) by BSA in square meters is necessary to avoid a low IPV/area ratio, which results in a functionally "hyperpermeable" peritoneal exchange. The contact area (the wetted membrane) is only a fraction of the anatomic area--that is, 30%-60% in humans (by computed tomography). Contact area depends on a variety of factors, such as posture and fill volume, that affect the degree of recruitment of membrane contact area. The exchange area is influenced by both the anatomic are and the contact area. However, it is mainly governed by the specific vascular area as determined by the peritoneal vascular perfusion and the capillaries available for exchange. Vascular area is dynamically affected by a variety of factors, such as the composition of the peritoneal dialysis fluid, the fill volume, and possible inflammatory agents.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
