SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Lawrence N. S.) ;hsvcat:5"

Sökning: WFRF:(Lawrence N. S.) > Samhällsvetenskap

  • Resultat 1-2 av 2
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Thompson, Paul M., et al. (författare)
  • The ENIGMA Consortium : large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data
  • 2014
  • Ingår i: BRAIN IMAGING BEHAV. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1931-7557 .- 1931-7565. ; 8:2, s. 153-182
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • The Enhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium is a collaborative network of researchers working together on a range of large-scale studies that integrate data from 70 institutions worldwide. Organized into Working Groups that tackle questions in neuroscience, genetics, and medicine, ENIGMA studies have analyzed neuroimaging data from over 12,826 subjects. In addition, data from 12,171 individuals were provided by the CHARGE consortium for replication of findings, in a total of 24,997 subjects. By meta-analyzing results from many sites, ENIGMA has detected factors that affect the brain that no individual site could detect on its own, and that require larger numbers of subjects than any individual neuroimaging study has currently collected. ENIGMA's first project was a genome-wide association study identifying common variants in the genome associated with hippocampal volume or intracranial volume. Continuing work is exploring genetic associations with subcortical volumes (ENIGMA2) and white matter microstructure (ENIGMA-DTI). Working groups also focus on understanding how schizophrenia, bipolar illness, major depression and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affect the brain. We review the current progress of the ENIGMA Consortium, along with challenges and unexpected discoveries made on the way.
  •  
2.
  • Schweinsberg, Martin, et al. (författare)
  • Same data, different conclusions : Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis
  • 2021
  • Ingår i: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. - : Elsevier BV. - 0749-5978 .- 1095-9920. ; 165, s. 228-249
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • In this crowdsourced initiative, independent analysts used the same dataset to test two hypotheses regarding the effects of scientists' gender and professional status on verbosity during group meetings. Not only the analytic approach but also the operationalizations of key variables were left unconstrained and up to individual analysts. For instance, analysts could choose to operationalize status as job title, institutional ranking, citation counts, or some combination. To maximize transparency regarding the process by which analytic choices are made, the analysts used a platform we developed called DataExplained to justify both preferred and rejected analytic paths in real time. Analyses lacking sufficient detail, reproducible code, or with statistical errors were excluded, resulting in 29 analyses in the final sample. Researchers reported radically different analyses and dispersed empirical outcomes, in a number of cases obtaining significant effects in opposite directions for the same research question. A Boba multiverse analysis demonstrates that decisions about how to operationalize variables explain variability in outcomes above and beyond statistical choices (e.g., covariates). Subjective researcher decisions play a critical role in driving the reported empirical results, underscoring the need for open data, systematic robustness checks, and transparency regarding both analytic paths taken and not taken. Implications for orga-nizations and leaders, whose decision making relies in part on scientific findings, consulting reports, and internal analyses by data scientists, are discussed.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-2 av 2
Typ av publikation
tidskriftsartikel (2)
Typ av innehåll
refereegranskat (2)
Författare/redaktör
Franke, Barbara (1)
Liu, Yang (1)
Landén, Mikael, 1966 (1)
Liberg, Benny (1)
Ekman, Carl-Johan (1)
Ching, Christopher R ... (1)
visa fler...
Agartz, Ingrid (1)
Alda, Martin (1)
Brouwer, Rachel M (1)
Cannon, Dara M (1)
Hajek, Tomas (1)
Malt, Ulrik F (1)
McDonald, Colm (1)
Melle, Ingrid (1)
Westlye, Lars T (1)
Thompson, Paul M (1)
Andreassen, Ole A (1)
Nilsonne, Gustav (1)
van den Akker, Olmo ... (1)
Schweinsberg, Martin (1)
Silberzahn, Raphael (1)
Uhlmann, Eric Luis (1)
Nyberg, Lars (1)
van der Wee, Nic J. (1)
Wang, Lei (1)
Danielsson, Henrik, ... (1)
Coppola, Giovanni (1)
Weale, Michael E. (1)
Miller, David (1)
Nilsson, Lars-Göran (1)
de Geus, Eco J. C. (1)
Martin, Nicholas G. (1)
Boomsma, Dorret I. (1)
Hardy, John (1)
Almeida, Jorge (1)
Djurovic, Srdjan (1)
Meyer-Lindenberg, An ... (1)
Ramasamy, Adaikalava ... (1)
Thalamuthu, Anbupala ... (1)
Cichon, Sven (1)
Trost, Sarah (1)
Laje, Gonzalo (1)
Pfennig, Andrea (1)
Bauer, Michael (1)
Rietschel, Marcella (1)
Schofield, Peter R (1)
McMahon, Francis J (1)
Robinson, David (1)
Deary, Ian J (1)
Bahník, Štěpán (1)
visa färre...
Lärosäte
Stockholms universitet (2)
Karolinska Institutet (2)
Göteborgs universitet (1)
Umeå universitet (1)
Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (1)
Linköpings universitet (1)
visa fler...
Handelshögskolan i Stockholm (1)
visa färre...
Språk
Engelska (2)
Forskningsämne (UKÄ/SCB)
Samhällsvetenskap (2)Ta bort avgränsningen
Naturvetenskap (1)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap (1)

År

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy