1. |
- Andrell, Cecilia, et al.
(författare)
-
"Tid är liv – därför bör Skåne införa sms-livräddning nu"
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Sydsvenskan. - 1652-814X. ; , s. 3-3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Eight researchers at the Lund University Center for Cardiac Arrest write that every minute of delay in cardiopulmonary resuscitation reduces the chance of survival by 10 percent.
|
|
2. |
- Israelsson, Johan, et al.
(författare)
-
Uppföljning efter hjärtstopp - nu finns svenska riktlinjer
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Läkartidningen. - 0023-7205. ; 116:12
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- According to previous research, a structured cardiac arrest follow-up may contribute to identifying health problems and the potential need of support among survivors and their relatives. However, a survey on post CA care and follow-up in Sweden, reported a lack of structure and major variations among Swedish hospitals. In 2016, Swedish guidelines were published with the aim to improve care. According to guidelines, all patients and their relatives should be offered a follow-up visit within 1-3 months after hospital discharge, including screening for cognitive and emotional problems and provision of information. More information is available at https:// www.hlr.nu/vard-efter-hjartstopp/.
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
- Lilja, Gisela, et al.
(författare)
-
Uppföljning av patient och närstående efter hjärtstopp varierar stort
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Läkartidningen. - 0023-7205 .- 1652-7518. ; 112
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The return to a good life after successfully resuscitated cardiac arrest may be hindered by cardiovascular morbidity, psychological distress and the consequences of anoxic brain injury. To support the return to everyday life, patients and their relatives are in need of health care follow-up with multiple focuses. Usually, this follow-up consists of at least one of three parallel tracks; cardiology for interventions and secondary prevention, post intensive care follow-up to capture and prevent consequences of the traumatic event and the ICU stay, or neurological follow-up for patients with neurological sequels. None of these tracks include all patients. In addition, survivors are usually included and followed with patient related outcome measures (PROM) through the multiple Swedish national quality registers. The different clinical follow-up systems and the registers are not coordinated and assessments and questions may be repeated multiple times. A more integrated follow-up model has the potential to benefit the patient and their relatives and to reduce costs.
|
|