| 1. |
- Sjöholm, Anna, et al.
(författare)
-
Sedentary behaviour and physical activity of people with stroke in rehabilitation hospitals
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Stroke Research and Treatment. - : Hindawi Publishing Corporation. - 2042-0056 .- 2090-8105.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background. Sedentary behaviour is associated with health risks, independent of physical activity. This study aimed to investigate patterns of sedentary behaviour and physical activity among stroke survivors in rehabilitation hospitals. Methods. Stroke survivors admitted to four Swedish hospital-based rehabilitation units were recruited ≥7 days since stroke onset and their activity was measured using behavioural mapping. Sedentary behaviour was defined as lying down or sitting supported. Results. 104 patients were observed (53% men). Participants spent an average of 74% (standard deviation, SD 21%) of the observed day in sedentary activities. Continuous sedentary bouts of ≥1 hour represented 44% (SD 32%) of the observed day. A higher proportion (30%, SD 7%) of participants were physically active between 9:00 AM and 12:30 PM, compared to the rest of the observed day (23%, SD 6%, P < 0.0005). Patients had higher odds of being physically active in the hall (odds ratio, OR 1.7, P = 0.001) than in the therapy area. Conclusions. The time stroke survivors spend in stroke rehabilitation units may not be used in the most efficient way to promote maximal recovery. Interventions to promote reduced sedentary time could help improve outcome and these should be tested in clinical trials. © 2014 Anna Sjöholm et al.
|
|
| 2. |
- Skarin, Monica, et al.
(författare)
-
A mapping study on physical activity in stroke rehabilitation: Establishing the baseline
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. - : Medical Journals Sweden AB. - 1650-1977. ; 45:10, s. 997-1003
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To establish physical activity level, environment and social interaction in routine stroke rehabilitation practice. Methods: Patients at 4 hospital stroke rehabilitation units in Sweden at least 7 days post-stroke were observed over 1 week-day at 10 min intervals between 08.00 h and 17.00 h. At each observation, physical activity, location and people present were ascertained. Results: Patients (n=104) had a mean age of 70.3 (standard deviation (SD) 14.4) years. Median time since stroke was 19 (range 7-142) days. Patients were alone for 52% of the day, during this time 7% was spent in standing/walking activities. While with a physiotherapist patients were standing/walking for 43% of the time. Using median regression it was found that the median percentage of time spent in standing/walking was associated with gait independence and age. Gait independence increased the median percentage of time spent in standing/walking by 16.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.1-20.9, p<0.001), while an increase of 1 year of age reduced the median percentage of time spent in standing/walking by 0.16% (95% CI -0.31 to -0.01, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Patients had low levels of physical activity and social interaction. This study suggests that there is a huge potential to increase patients' activity level and augment social interaction above current levels.
|
|
| 3. |
- Cumming, T. B., et al.
(författare)
-
Early Mobilization After Stroke Is Not Associated With Cognitive Outcome Findings From AVERT
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Stroke. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 0039-2499 .- 1524-4628. ; 49:9, s. 2147-2154
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and Purpose We aimed to determine whether early mobilization after stroke affects subsequent cognitive function. Methods-AVERT (A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial) was an international, 56-site, phase 3 randomized controlled trial, conducted from 2006 to 2015. Participants were included if they were aged 18+, presented within 24 hours of stroke, and satisfied physiological limits for blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature. Participants were randomized to receive either usual stroke unit care or very early and more frequent mobilization in addition to usual stroke unit care. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, scored 0 to 30, was introduced as a 3-month outcome during 2008. Results-Of the 2104 patients included in AVERT, 317 were assessed before the Montreal Cognitive Assessment's introduction. Of the remaining 1787, 1189 (66.5%) had complete Montreal Cognitive Assessment data, 456 (25.5%) had partially or completely missing data, 136 (7.6%) had died, and 6 (0.3%) were lost to follow-up. In surviving participants with complete data, adjusting for age and stroke severity, total Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was no different in the intervention (n=595; median, 23; interquartile range, 19-26; mean, 21.9; SD, 5.9) and usual care (n=594; median, 23; interquartile range, 19-26; mean, 21.8; SD, 5.9) groups (P=0.68). Conclusions-Exposure to earlier and more frequent mobilization in the acute stage of stroke does not influence cognitive outcome at 3 months. This stands in contrast to the primary outcome from AVERT (modified Rankin Scale), where the intervention group had less favorable outcomes than controls.
|
|
| 4. |
- Cumming, T. B., et al.
(författare)
-
Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination are both valid cognitive tools in stroke
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. - : Hindawi Limited. - 0001-6314. ; 128:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective - To determine the validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) as screening tools for cognitive impairment after stroke. Materials and methods - Cognitive assessments were administered over 2 sessions (1 week apart) at 3 months post-stroke. Scores on the MoCA and MMSE were evaluated against a diagnosis of cognitive impairment derived from a comprehensive neuropsychological battery (the criterion standard). Results - Sixty patients participated in the study [mean age 72.1 years (SD = 13.9), mean education 10.5 years (SD = 3.9), median acute NIHSS score 5 (IQR 3-7)]. The MoCA yielded lower scores (median = 21, IQR = 17-24; mean = 20.0, SD = 5.4) than the MMSE (median = 26, IQR = 22-27; mean = 24.2, SD = 4.5). MMSE data were more skewed towards ceiling than MoCA data (skewness = -1.09 vs -0.73). Area under the receiver operator curve was higher for MoCA than for MMSE (0.87 vs 0.84), although this difference was not significant (chi(2) = 0.48, P = 0.49). At their optimal cut-offs, the MoCA had better sensitivity than the MMSE (0.92 vs 0.82) but poorer specificity (0.67 vs 0.76). Conclusions - The MoCA is a valid screening tool for post-stroke cognitive impairment; it is more sensitive but less specific than the MMSE. Contrary to the prevailing view, the MMSE also exhibited acceptable validity in this setting.
|
|
| 5. |
- Cumming, T. B., et al.
(författare)
-
The AVERT MoCA Data: Scoring Reliability in a Large Multicenter Trial
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Assessment. - : SAGE Publications. - 1073-1911 .- 1552-3489. ; 27:5, s. 976-981
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely used cognitive screening tool in stroke. As scoring the visuospatial/executive MoCA items involves subjective judgement, reliability is important. Analyzing data on these items from A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT), we compared the original scoring of assessors (n= 102) to blind scoring by a single, independent rater. In a sample of scoresheets from 1,119 participants, we found variable interrater reliability. The match between original assessors and the independent rater was the following: trail-making 97% (kappa = 0.94), cube copy 90% (kappa = 0.80), clock contour 92% (kappa = 0.49), clock numbers 89% (kappa = 0.67), and clock hands 72% (kappa = 0.46). For all items except clock contour, the independent rater was "stricter" than the original assessors. Discrepancies were typically errors in original scoring, rather than borderline differences in subjective judgement. In trials that include the MoCA, researchers should emphasize scoring rules to assessors and implement independent data checking, especially for clock hands, to maximize accuracy.
|
|
| 6. |
- Muhl, Linnea, et al.
(författare)
-
Mobilization after thrombolysis (rtPA) within 24 hours of acute stroke: what factors influence inclusion of patients in A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT)?
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Bmc Neurology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2377. ; 14
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: A key treatment for acute ischaemic stroke is thrombolysis (rtPA). However, treatment is not devoid of side effects and patients are carefully selected. AVERT (A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial), a large, ongoing international phase III trial, tests whether starting out of bed activity within 24 hours of stroke onset improves outcome. Patients treated with rtPA can be recruited if the physician allows (447 included to date). This study aimed to identify factors that might influence the inclusion of rtPA treated patients in AVERT. Methods: Data from all patients thrombolysed at Austin Health, Australia, between September 2007 and December 2011 were retrospectively extracted from medical records. Factors of interest included: demographic and stroke characteristics, 24 hour clinical response to rtPA treatment, cerebral imaging and process factors (day and time of admission). Results: 211 patients received rtPA at Austin Health and 50 (24%) were recruited to AVERT (AVERT). Of the 161 patients not recruited, 105 (65%) were eligible, and could potentially have been included (pot-AVERT). There were no significant differences in demographics, Oxfordshire classification or stroke severity (NIHSS) on admission between groups. Size and localization of stroke on imaging and symptomatic intracerebral heamorrhage rate did not differ. Patients included in AVERT showed less change in NIHSS 24 hours post rtPA (median change = 1, IQR (-1,4)) than those in the pot-AVERT group (median change = 3, IQR (0,6)) by the median difference of 2 points (95% CI: 0.3; p = 0.03). A higher proportion of rtPA treated AVERT patients were admitted on weekdays (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Excluding a possible clinical instability, no significant clinical differences were identified between thrombolysed patients included in AVERT and those who were not. Over 500 AVERT patients will be treated with rtPA at trial end. These results suggest we may be able to generalize findings to other rtPA treated patients beyond the trial population.
|
|
