| 1. |
- Arefalk, Gabriel, et al.
(författare)
-
Discontinuation of Smokeless Tobacco and Mortality Risk After Myocardial Infarction
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Circulation. - 0009-7322 .- 1524-4539. ; 130:4, s. 325-323
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background-Given the indications of increased risk for fatal myocardial infarction (MI) in people who use snus, a moist smokeless tobacco product, we hypothesized that discontinuation of snus use after an MI would reduce mortality risk. Methods and Results-All patients who were admitted to coronary care units for an MI in Sweden between 2005 and 2009 and were <75 years of age underwent a structured examination 2 months after discharge (the baseline of the present study). We investigated the risk of mortality in post-MI snus quitters (n=675) relative to post-MI continuing snus users (n=1799) using Cox proportional hazards analyses. During follow-up (mean 2.1 years), 83 participants died. The mortality rate was 9.7 (95% confidence interval, 5.7-16.3) per 1000 person-years at risk in post-MI snus quitters and 18.7 (14.8-23.6) per 1000 person-years at risk in post-MI continuing snus users. After adjustment for age and sex, post-MI snus quitters had half the mortality risk of post-MI continuing snus users (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.91). In a multivariable-adjusted model, the hazard ratio was 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.32-1.02). The corresponding estimate for people who quit smoking after MI versus post-MI continuing smokers was 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.69). Conclusions-In this study, discontinuation of snus use after an MI was associated with a nearly halved mortality risk, similar to the benefit associated with smoking cessation. These observations suggest that the use of snus after MI should be discouraged.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Baron, Tomasz, et al.
(författare)
-
Impact on Long-Term Mortality of Presence of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Classification of Myocardial Infarction
- 2016
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Medicine. - : Elsevier BV. - 0002-9343 .- 1555-7162. ; 129:4, s. 398-406
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: In contrast to the associated-with-thromboembolic-event type 1 myocardial infarction, type 2 myocardial infarction is caused by acute imbalance between oxygen supply and demand of myocardium. Type 2 myocardial infarction may be present in patients with or without obstructive coronary artery disease, but knowledge about patient characteristics, treatments, and outcome in relation to coronary artery status is lacking. We aimed to compare background characteristics, triggering mechanisms, treatment, and long-term prognosis in a large real-life cohort of patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction with and without obstructive coronary artery disease.METHODS: All 41,817 consecutive patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction registered in the Swedish myocardial infarction registry (SWEDEHEART) who underwent coronary angiography between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2013, with the last follow-up on December 31, 2014, were studied.RESULTS: In 92.8% of 40,501 patients classified as type 1 and in 52.5% of patients classified as type 2 myocardial infarction, presence of an obstructive coronary artery disease could be shown. Within the patients with obstructive coronary artery disease, those with type 2 myocardial infarction were older, and had more comorbidities and smaller necrosis as compared with type 1 myocardial infarction. In contrast, there was almost no difference in risk profile and extent of myocardial infarction between type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction patients with nonobstructive coronary artery stenosis. The crude long-term mortality was higher in type 2 as compared with type 1 myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary artery disease (hazard ratio [HR] 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-2.03), but was lower after adjustment (HR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61-0.94). In myocardial infarction patients with nonobstructive coronary artery stenosis, the mortality risk was similar regardless of the clinical myocardial infarction type (crude HR 1.14; 95% CI, 0.84-1.55; adjusted HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.52-1.29).CONCLUSIONS: The substantial differences in risk factors, treatment, and outcome in patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary artery disease supports the relevance of the division between type 1 and type 2 in this population. On the contrary, in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery stenosis, irrespective of the clinical type, a similar risk profile, extent of necrosis, and longterm prognosis were observed, indicating that distinction between type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction in these patients seems to be inappropriate.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Baron, Tomasz, et al.
(författare)
-
Type 2 myocardial infarction in clinical practice.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Heart. - : BMJ. - 1355-6037 .- 1468-201X. ; 101:2, s. 101-106
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We aimed to assess differences in incidence, clinical features, current treatment strategies and outcome in patients with type 2 vs. type 1 acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
|
|
| 9. |
- Bellman, Christina, et al.
(författare)
-
Achievement of secondary preventive goals after acute myocardial infarction : a comparison between participants and nonparticipants in a routine patient education program in Sweden
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. - 0889-4655 .- 1550-5049. ; 24:5, s. 362-368
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Modification of risk factors such as smoking, obesity, physical inactivity, and hypertension after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity. Therefore, most hospitals in Sweden invite patients with myocardial infarction to an educational program, the "Heart School," where they can learn about lifestyle changes. Whether this kind of education program applied in routine care increases the proportion of patients achieving secondary prevention goals is unknown. METHODS: A cohort of consecutive patients treated for AMI and included in a quality registry was followed up during 1 year. The main aim was to study the effects of taking part in the Heart School on smoking habits, blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, exercise habits, cardiac symptoms, quality of life, and readmissions to hospital. Patients included in the national quality register of secondary prevention after AMI who had participated in the educational program were compared with those who had not participated in the program. Achievements of secondary prevention goals 1 year after the myocardial infarction were evaluated. The study included 2,822 patients. RESULTS: The result showed that patients who participated in the Heart School stopped smoking more often than those who did not participate (adjusted odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-2.78). The Heart School had no effects on the other variables that were examined. CONCLUSION: The interventions currently used in the Swedish Heart School seem to be insufficient to obtain sustainable lifestyle changes, except for smoking cessation.
|
|
| 10. |
- Hambræus, Kristina, 1970-
(författare)
-
From Stenting to Preventing : Invasive and Long-term Treatment for Coronary Artery Disease in Sweden
- 2014
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Treatment with coronary interventions, long-term treatment and life style changes can reduce symptoms and improve prognosis. The aim of this thesis was to investigate aspects of invasive treatment for multivessel coronary artery disease, and to investigate adherence to prevention guidelines one year after myocardial infarction. We used the national quality registry SWEDEHEART to collect data on long term treatment one year after myocardial infarction for 51 620 patients < 75 years of age. For 17 236 of the patients, we collected LDL-cholesterol measurements from SWEDEHEART and defined use of lipid lowering drugs from the Prescribed Drug Register. We developed a questionnaire for post-PCI-patients to investigate patients’ understanding of cause and treatment of coronary artery disease. For 23 342 PCI-patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, SWEDEHEART-data was linked to Swedish health data registries to determine one year outcome for patients undergoing incomplete vs. complete revascularization. Lipid control (LDL-cholesterol < 1.8 mmol/L) was attained by one in four patients one year after myocardial infarction, whereas blood pressure control (< 140 mmHg) was attained by two thirds of patients. Lipid and blood pressure control was lower for women but there was no gender difference in smoking cessation rate: 56 %. Over 90 % of patients were treated with a statin after myocardial infarction but treatment was intensified for only one in five patients with LDL-cholesterol above target.The questionnaire study revealed that non-modifiable factors such as age and heredity were more often seen as cause of coronary artery disease than modifiable life style factors. Only one in five patients perceived CAD as a chronic illness, requiring life style changes.Two thirds of PCI-patients with multivessel disease underwent incomplete revascularisation, and this was associated with a twofold risk for the combination of death, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization up to one year, compared to patients who underwent complete revascularization.We conclude that long term treatment after myocardial infarction is suboptimal in relation to guideline recommendations. Assessment of patients’ views on CAD and better health education post PCI may facilitate life style changes. Further studies need to investigate whether complete revascularization will improve outcome for PCI-patients with multivessel disease.
|
|
