| 1. |
- Gross, Mechthild M., et al.
(författare)
-
Women's experiences on VBAC: results of a metasynthesis
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Optimising Childbirth Across Europe, 9-10 April 2014. Brussels, Belgium..
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: More and more women experience a caesarean section with their first, or later, birth. During a subsequent pregnancy they experience a challenging period of decision making on the mode of birth. Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) is a relevant option for a large number of women. Despite lots of quantitative studies on VBAC there is a lack of studies that report the experiences of women. Aim of review: To report the main themes of women’s experiences of VBAC. Search strategy: The following databases were searched: CINAHL, EBSCO, Journals@ OVID, Pubmed, PSYCHINFO, using the keywords VBAC, vaginal birth after caesarean section, qualitative study, experiences, qualitative and women´s experiences in various combinations. Review methodology: In total, 1981 papers were identified; of these, 1959 had to be excluded. From the remaining 22 papers eleven were excluded at this stage, as not focusing on women´s experiences, or only focusing on experiences of CS in relation to VBAC. A metasynthesis based on the interpretative meta ethnography method was conducted. Main findings: Four final themes became obvious: ‘to be involved in decision about mode of delivery is difficult but important,’ ‘vaginal birth has several positive aspects mainly described by women,’ ‘vaginal birth after CS is a risky project,’ and ‘own strong responsibility for giving birth vaginally’. The papers discussed issues such as the women´s experience in relation to different aspects of VBAC, decision-making whether to give birth vaginally, the influence of health professionals on decision-making, reason for trying a vaginal birth, experiences when choosing VBAC, experiences of giving birth vaginally, and giving birth with CS when preferring VBAC. Conclusion: It became obvious that women may feel as though they are in a fog when preparing for a VBAC. Women need evidence-based information not only about the risks involved but also about positive aspects of VBAC.
|
|
| 2. |
- Lundgren, Ingela, 1957, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section) : a study from countries with low VBAC rates.
- 2016
-
Ingår i: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2393 .- 1471-2393. ; 16:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing worldwide and the most common reason is repeat CS following previous CS. For most women a vaginal birth after a previous CS (VBAC) is a safe option. However, the rate of VBAC differs in an international perspective. Obtaining deeper knowledge of clinicians' views on VBAC can help in understanding the factors of importance for increasing VBAC rates. Focus group interviews with clinicians and women in three countries with high VBAC rates (Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands) and three countries with low VBAC rates (Ireland, Italy and Germany) are part of "OptiBIRTH", an ongoing research project. The study reported here aims to explore the views of clinicians from countries with low VBAC rates on factors of importance for improving VBAC rates.METHODS: Focus group interviews were held in Ireland, Italy and Germany. In total 71 clinicians participated in nine focus group interviews. Five central questions about VBAC were used and interviews were analysed using content analysis. The analysis was performed in each country in the native language and then translated into English. All data were then analysed together and final categories were validated in each country.RESULTS: The findings are presented in four main categories with several sub-categories: 1) "prameters for VBAC", including the importance of the obstetric history, present obstetric factors, a positive attitude among those who are centrally involved, early follow-up after CS and antenatal classes; 2) "organisational support and resources for women undergoing a VBAC", meaning a successful VBAC requires clinical expertise and resources during labour; 3) "fear as a key inhibitor of successful VBAC", including understanding women's fear of childbirth, clinicians' fear of VBAC and the ways that clinicians' fear can be transferred to women; and 4) "shared decision making - rapport, knowledge and confidence", meaning ensuring consistent, realistic and unbiased information and developing trust within the clinician-woman relationship.CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that increasing the VBAC rate depends on organisational factors, the care offered during pregnancy and childbirth, the decision-making process and the strategies employed to reduce fear in all involved.
|
|
| 3. |
- Lundgren, Ingela, 1957, et al.
(författare)
-
'Groping through the fog': a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (Vaginal birth after Caesarean section)
- 2012
-
Ingår i: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2393. ; 12:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC) is a relevant question for a large number of women due to the internationally rising Caesarean section (CS) rate. There is a great deal of research based on quantitative studies but few qualitative studies about women's experiences. Aim: To integrate qualitative findings and deepen the understanding of women's experiences of VBAC. Method: A metasynthesis based on the interpretative meta ethnography method was conducted. The inclusion criterion was peer-review qualitative articles from different disciplines about women's experiences of VBAC. Eleven articles were checked for quality, and eight articles were included in the synthesis. Results: The included studies were from Australia (four), UK (three), and US (one), and studied women's experience in relation to different aspects of VBAC; decision-making whether to give birth vaginally, the influence of health professionals on decision-making, reason for trying a vaginal birth, experiences when choosing VBAC, experiences of giving birth vaginally, and giving birth with CS when preferring VBAC. The main results are presented with the metaphor groping through the fog; for the women the issue of VBAC is like being in a fog, where decision-making and information from the health care system and professionals, both during pregnancy and the birth, is unclear and contrasting. The results are further presented with four themes: 'to be involved in decision about mode of delivery is difficult but important,' 'vaginal birth has several positive aspects mainly described by women,' 'vaginal birth after CS is a risky project,' and 'own strong responsibility for giving birth vaginally'. Conclusion: In order to promote VBAC, more studies are needed from different maternity settings and countries about women's experiences. Women need evidence-based information not only about the risks involved but also positive aspects of VBAC.
|
|
| 4. |
- Portz, Suniva, et al.
(författare)
-
Midwives and obstetricians’ attitudes towards VBAC: Development and validation of the HCAV-scale
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. - : Elsevier BV. - 1877-5756. ; 27
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To develop a scale that measures attitudes towards vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) among clinicians. Methods: A cross sectional survey among midwives (n = 58) and obstetricians (n = 51). A 23-item “Hannover Clinicians’ Attitudes towards VBAC scale” (HCAV–scale) was developed. Indicators of reliability and validity were assessed, including item-to-total correlation, Cronbach alpha coefficient and factor analysis. Results: The response rate was 35.3% (n = 109). The HCAV–scale showed high construct validity and high internal consistency. The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the 23 items was 0.87 (n = 89), indicating good internal consistency of the items. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in factor loadings between 0.34 and 0.70; all 23 items loaded above 0.3 on one factor, providing evidence that the scale can be conceptualized as one dimensional. Conclusions: The HCAV–scale is a reliable and valid tool to assess clinicians’ favourable attitudes towards VBAC. The scale can be used to assess how attitudes of clinicians might contribute to institutional variations in VBAC rates, and has the potential to enhance inter-professional understanding and collaboration around VBAC and quality of care for childbearing people with a previous caesarean.
|
|
| 5. |
- Sinclair, Marlene, et al.
(författare)
-
A systematic literature review of computer-based behavioural change interventions to inform the design of an online VBAC intervention for the OptiBIRTH European randomized trial.
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Evidence Based Midwifery. - 1479-4489. ; 15:1, s. 5-13
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim: The aim of this research was o systematically review computer-based, behavior change (BC) interventions during pregnancy and their design components in order to determine their best application within the context of the OptiBIRTH intervention. Design: A systematic literature review was undertaken using the Cochrane collaboration guidelines for systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions. Literature searches were conducted in; Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, from database inception to June 2015. Cochrane Risk of Bias criteria was applied to assess the methodological quality of the papers and a taxonomy of BC techniques was used to appraise the interventions. PICO. Participants included healthy pregnant women who were ≥18 years old. The types of intervention used were computer-based interventions designed to facilitate a BC approach in a sample of pregnant women. The comparison was routine antenatal care. The primary outcome included improved health behavior(s), as an indicator of the intention behind the intervention design. Results. A total of 343 papers were identified through database-searching and hand- searching methods; 80 duplicates were removed. From the remaining 263, 244 did not explicitly address the subject under review. Therefore, 19 full text articles were assessed for eligibility; 16 did not meet eligibility criteria and were excluded at this stage. This resulted in a total of three studies being selected for inclusion in this review (Jackson et al, 2011; Tzilos et al, 2011; Tsoh et al, 2010). The computer-based interventions were designed to bring about BC in relation to alcohol consumption, smoking or diet and exercise during pregnancy. Interventions delivered varied between two types; purely computer-delivered (Tzilos et al. 2011) or a combination of both computer plus face-to-face input (Jackson et al, 2011; Tsoh et al. 2010). Techniques used included motivational interviewing, problem solving cognitive dissonance and goal setting. Types of measurement outcomes varied but were all self-reported behavioral outcomes. Statistically significant improvements in behavioral outcomes were seen in the interventions by Jackson et al (2011) and Tsoh et al (2011), but not in the intervention by Tzilos et al (2011). The GRADE analysis identified that all studies combined lacked blinding and relied on self-reported data increasing risk of bias. Conclusion. This systematic review reports on the best available evidence and theory to design an online component of a complex intervention for use in an RCT to enhance women´s shared decision-making experience about vaginal births after caesarean (VBAC). The review reports the differences between the observed BC approach and that of a decision-making being focused on a more healthy option. As a result, techniques designed to create dissonance are considered appropriate. Shared decision-making, however, is conceptually different, in that the goal is to facilitate a woman in discovering the best direction of travel for her as person. Therefore, the authors argue that it is crucial for healthcare professionals designing complex healthcare interventions (either BC techniques or shared decision-making) to ensure that a person´s self-determination is respected through having access to relevant and understandable information and healthcare professionals who understand a woman´s motivation. However, it is not possible to draw firm conclusions from three studies and there is a requirement for further research.
|
|
| 6. |
- Smith, Valerie, et al.
(författare)
-
Protocol for the development of a salutogenic intrapartum core outcome set (SIPCOS)
- 2017
-
Ingår i: BMC Medical Research Methodology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2288. ; 17:61
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Maternity intrapartum care research and clinical care more often focus on outcomes that minimise or prevent adverse health rather than on what constitutes positive health and wellbeing (salutogenesis). This was highlighted recently in a systematic review of reviews of intrapartum reported outcomes where only 8% of 1648 individual outcomes, from 102 systematic reviews, were agreed as being salutogenically-focused. Added to this is variation in the outcomes measured in individual studies rendering it very difficult for researchers to synthesise, fully, the evidence from studies on a particular topic. One of the suggested ways to address this is to develop and apply an agreed standardised set of outcomes, known as a ‘core outcome set’ (COS). In this paper we present a protocol for the development of a salutogenic intrapartum COS (SIPCOS) for use in maternity care research and a SIPCOS for measuring in daily intrapartum clinical care. Methods: The study proposes three phases in developing the final SIPCOSs. Phase one, which is complete, involved the conduct of a systematic review of reviews to identify a preliminary list of salutogenically-focused outcomes that had previously been reported in systematic reviews of intrapartum interventions. Sixteen unique salutogenically-focused outcome categories were identified. Phase two will involve prioritising these outcomes, from the perspective of key stakeholders (users of maternity services, clinicians and researchers) by asking them to rate the importance of each outcome for inclusion in the SIPCOSs. A final consensus meeting (phase three) will be held, bringing international stakeholders together to review the preliminary SIPCOSs resulting from the survey and to agree and finalise the final SIPCOSs for use in future maternity care research and daily clinical care. Discussion: The expectation in developing the SIPCOSs is that they will be collected and reported in all future studies evaluating intrapartum interventions and measured/recorded in future intrapartum clinical care, as routine, alongside other outcomes also deemed important in the context of the study or clinical scenario. Using the SIPCOSs in this way, will promote and encourage standardised measurements of positive health outcomes in maternity care, into the future.
|
|
