| 1. |
- Gupta, Anil, et al.
(författare)
-
A meta-analysis of the efficacy of wound catheters for post-operative pain management
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. - : Blackwell Publishing Ltd. - 0001-5172 .- 1399-6576. ; 55:7, s. 785-796
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Local anesthetics (LA) are injected via catheters placed in surgical wounds for post-operative analgesia. The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess whether LA reduce pain intensity when injected via wound catheters. A literature search was performed from Medline via PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane database from 1966 until November 2009. The search strategy included the following key words: pain, postoperative, catheters and local anesthetics. Two co-authors independently read every article that was initially included and extracted data into a pre-defined study record form. A total of 753 studies primarily fit the search criteria and 163 were initially extracted. Of these, 32 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Wound catheters provided no significant analgesia at rest or on activity, except in patients undergoing gynecological and obstetric surgery at 48 h (P = 0.03). The overall morphine consumption was lower (approximate to 13 mg) during 0-24 h (P less than 0.001) in these patients. No significant differences in side effects were found, except for a lower risk of wound breakdown (P = 0.048) and a shorter length of hospital stay (P = 0.04) in patients receiving LA. A statistically significant heterogeneity was seen between the studies in most end-points. LA injected via wound catheters did not reduce pain intensity, except at 48 h in a subgroup of patients undergoing obstetric and gynecological surgery. Rescue analgesic consumption was also lower in this group at 0-24 h. The magnitude of these effects was small and compounded by pronounced heterogeneity.
|
|
| 2. |
- Kuchalik, Jan, et al.
(författare)
-
Postoperative pain relief after total hip arthroplasty : a randomized, double-blind comparison between intrathecal morphine and local infiltration analgesia
- 2013
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Anaesthesia. - : Elsevier BV. - 0007-0912 .- 1471-6771. ; 111:5, s. 793-799
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA) can delay mobilization. This was assessed after intrathecal morphine (ITM) compared with local infiltration analgesia (LIA) using a non-inferiority design. Eighty patients were recruited in this randomized, double-blind study. ITM 0.1 mg (Group ITM) or periarticular local anaesthetic (ropivacaine 300 mg)ketorolac 30 mg epinephrine 0.5 mg (total volume 151.5 ml) (Group LIA) were compared. After 24 h, 22 ml of saline (Group ITM) or ropivacaine (150 mg)ketorolac (30 mg)epinephrine (0.1 mg) (Group LIA) were injected via a catheter. After operation, rescue analgesic consumption, pain intensity, and home-readiness were measured. Morphine consumption was equivalent, median difference 0 mg (95 confidence interval 4 to 4.5) between the groups at 024 h. During 2448 h, it was lower in Group LIA (3 mg, 060 mg, median, range) compared with Group ITM (10 mg, 081 mg) (P0.01). Lower pain scores were recorded at rest at 8 h in Group ITM (P0.01), but in Group LIA on standing and mobilization, at 2448 h (P0.01). Paracetamol and tramadol consumption was lower in Group LIA (P0.05 and 0.05, respectively) as was pruritus, nausea, and vomiting (P0.05). Lower pain intensity was recorded early after surgery in ITM group but later, analgesic consumption, pain intensity on mobilization, and side-effects were lower in patients receiving LIA. LIA is a good alternative to ITM in patients undergoing THA.
|
|
| 3. |
- Siekmann, Wiebke, 1978-, et al.
(författare)
-
Surgical and not analgesic technique affects postoperative inflammation following colorectal cancer surgery : a prospective, randomized study
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Colorectal Disease. - : Wiley. - 1462-8910 .- 1463-1318. ; 19:6, s. 186-195
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIM: Epidural analgesia reduces the surgical stress response. However, its effect on pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the genesis of inflammation following major abdominal surgery remains unclear. Our main objective was to elucidate whether perioperative epidural analgesia prevents the inflammatory response following colorectal cancer surgery.METHODS: Ninety-six patients scheduled for open or laparoscopic surgery were randomized to epidural analgesia (group E) or patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (group P). Surgery and anaesthesia were standardized in both groups. Plasma cortisol, insulin and serum cytokines [interleukin 1β (IL-1β), IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-13, tumour necrosis factor α, interferon γ, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, prostaglandin E2 and vascular endothelial growth factor] were measured preoperatively (T0), 1-6 h postoperatively (T1) and 3-5 days postoperatively (T2). Mixed model analysis was used, after logarithmic transformation when appropriate, for analyses of cytokines and stress markers.RESULTS: >There were no significant differences in any serum cytokine concentration between groups P and E at any time point except for IL-10 which was 87% higher in group P [median and range 4.1 (2.3-9.2) pg/ml] compared to group E [2.6 (1.3-4.7) pg/ml] (P = 0.002) at T1. There was no difference in plasma cortisol and insulin between the groups at any time point after surgery. A significant difference in median serum cytokine concentration was found between open and laparoscopic surgery with higher levels of IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 at T1 in patients undergoing open surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery. No difference in serum cytokine concentration was detected between the groups or between the surgical technique at T2.CONCLUSIONS: Open surgery, compared to laparoscopic surgery, has greater impact on these inflammatory mediators than epidural analgesia vs intravenous analgesia.
|
|
| 4. |
- Darvish, Bijan, 1969-, et al.
(författare)
-
Auditory function following post-dural puncture headache treated with epidural blood patch : a long-term follow-up
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. - : Wiley-Blackwell. - 0001-5172 .- 1399-6576. ; 59:10, s. 1340-1354
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Epidural analgesia is commonly used for pain management during labor. Sometimes, accidental dural puncture (ADP) occurs causing severely debilitating headache, which may be associated with transient hearing loss. We investigated if auditory function may be impaired several years after ADP treated with epidural blood patch (EBP).Methods: Sixty women (ADP group) without documented hearing disability, who received EBP following ADP during labor between the years 2005-2011 were investigated in 2013 for auditory function using the following tests: otoscopic examination, tympanometry, pure tone audiometry, and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Additionally, they responded to a questionnaire, the Speech, Spatial and Qualities (SSQ) of hearing, concerning perceived hearing impairment. The results were compared to a control group of 20 healthy, non-pregnant women in the same age group.Results: The audiometric test battery was performed 5.2 (1.9)years after delivery. No significant differences were found between the ADP and the control groups in tympanometry or otoacoustic emissions. Pure tone audiometry revealed a significant but small (<5dB) difference between the ADP and control groups (P<0.05). The ability to hear speech in noise as measured by SSQ was significantly reduced in the ADP group compared to the control group (P<0.05).Conclusions: A minor hearing loss was detected in the ADP group compared to the control group in pure tone audiometry in some women and during speech-in-noise component several years after accidental dural puncture treated with an epidural blood patch. This small residual hearing loss has minor clinical significance.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Fant, F., et al.
(författare)
-
Thoracic epidural analgesia inhibits the neuro-hormonal but not the acute inflammatory stress response after radical retropubic prostatectomy
- 2013
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Anaesthesia. - Oxford, USA : Oxford University Press. - 0007-0912 .- 1471-6771. ; 110:5, s. 747-757
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia has been shown to suppress the neurohormonal stress response, but its role in the inflammatory response is unclear. The primary aim was to assess whether the choice of analgesic technique influences these processes in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.Methods: Twenty-six patients were randomized to Group P (systemic opioid-based analgesia) or Group E (thoracic epidural-based analgesia) perioperatively. Induction and maintenance of anaesthesia followed a standardized protocol. The following measurements were made perioperatively: plasma cortisol, glucose, insulin, C-reactive proteins, leucocyte count, plasma cytokines [interleukin (IL)-6, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha], and pokeweed mitogen-stimulated cytokines [interferon (IFN)-gamma, IL-2, IL-12p70, IL-10, IL-4, and IL-17]. Other parameters recorded were pain, morphine consumption, and perioperative complications.Results: Plasma concentration of cortisol and glucose were significantly higher in Group P compared with Group E at the end of surgery, the mean difference was 232 nmol litre(-1) [95% confidence interval (CI) 84-381] (P=0.004) and 1.6 mmol litre(-1) (95% CI 0.6-2.5) (P=0.003), respectively. No significant differences were seen in IL-6 and TNF-alpha at 24 h (P=0.953 and 0.368, respectively) and at 72 h (P=0.931 and 0.691, respectively). IL-17 was higher in Group P compared with Group E, both at 24 h (P=0.001) and 72 h (P=0.018) after operation. Pain intensity was significantly greater in Group P compared with Group E (P<0.05) up to 24 h.Conclusions: In this small prospective randomized study, thoracic epidural analgesia reduced the early postoperative stress response but not the acute inflammatory response after radical retrobupic prostatectomy, suggesting that other pathways are involved during the acute phase reaction.
|
|
| 7. |
- Fant, Federica, et al.
(författare)
-
Thoracic epidural analgesia or patient-controlled local analgesia for radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized, double-blind study
- 2011
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Anaesthesia. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0007-0912 .- 1471-6771. ; 107:5, s. 782-789
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background. Postoperative pain after radical retropubic prostatectomy is moderate to severe. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether intra-abdominal local anaesthetics provide similar analgesia compared with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanMethods. Fifty patients, ASA I-II, participated in this prospective, double-blinded study. All patients had TEA. After operation, they were randomized into two groups of 25 patients: Group PCLA (patient-controlled local analgesia): self-administration of 10 ml of ropivacaine 2 mg ml(-1) via the intra-abdominal catheter for 48 h. Group TEA: infusion of 10 ml h(-1) of ropivacaine 1 mg ml(-1), fentanyl 2 mg ml(-1), and epinephrine 2 mg ml 21 epidurally for 48 h. The primary endpoint was pain on coughing at 4 h after operation. Rescue medication was morphine i.v. as required. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanResults. Pain on coughing at 4, 24, and 48 h was significantly lower in Group TEA [0 (0-10)] compared with Group PCLA [4 (0-10)] (Pandlt;0.05). Significantly lower pain intensity was also found in Group TEA compared with Group PCLA at the incision site, deep pain, and pain on coughing at 4 and 24 h (Pandlt;0.05). Morphine consumption was significantly greater in Group PCLA [12 (0-46)] compared with Group TEA [0 (0-20)] at 0-48 h after operation [median (range)] (P=0.015). Maximum expiratory pressure was higher in Group TEA compared with Group PCLA at 24 h (Pandlt;0.01). less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanConclusions. TEA provides superior postoperative pain relief with better preservation of expiratory muscle strength compared with PCLA.
|
|
