| 1. |
- Eriksson, Carl, 1981-, et al.
(författare)
-
Changes in medical management and colectomy rates : a population-based cohort study on the epidemiology and natural history of ulcerative colitis in Orebro, Sweden, 1963-2010
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. - Hoboken, USA : John Wiley & Sons. - 0269-2813 .- 1365-2036. ; 46:8, s. 748-757
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Whether the epidemiology of ulcerative colitis (UC) has changed during recent decades is partly unknown.Aim: To depict temporal trends in the epidemiology and medical treatment of UC as well as the long-term risk of progression in disease extent and colectomy, during 1963-2010.Methods: Patients were identified by evaluation of all medical records in the archive of the Colitis Clinic, Orebro University Hospital. Comparisons were made between three time periods, 1963-1975, 1976-1990 and 1991-2005.Results: The annual age-standardised incidence increased from 3.5 to 18.5 per 100 000 during the study period (P < .01). Correspondingly, the prevalence increased from 44 to 474 per 100 000 between 1965 and 2010. A higher proportion of males than females had extensive colitis at diagnosis (odds ratio: 1.55; 95% CI 1.17-2.05; P < .01). The risk for progression in disease extent was 34.5% and 18.5% at 10 years, for patients with proctitis and left-sided colitis, respectively (P < .01). The use of 5-aminosalicylates, within 10 years, rise from 79% to 92% between 1963-1975 and 1976-1990 (P < .01). Thiopurine use increased from 7% in 1976-1990 to 34% during 1991-2005 (P < .01). The colectomy rate at 10 years was 13.5% (95% CI 11.1%-15.8%), and the risk was lower among patients diagnosed in 1991-2005 compared to 1963-1975 (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.61; 95% CI 0.39-0.94; P = .02).Conclusion: The incidence and prevalence of UC increased over time, and the observed prevalence in 2010 is among the highest reported. In parallel, a decrease in colectomy rates was observed during the most recent decades, potentially reflecting improved medical treatment.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Eriksson, Carl, 1981-
(författare)
-
Epidemiological and therapeutic aspects of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- 2018
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Introduction: The two main forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. These are chronic inflammatory disorders, mainly affecting the gastrointestinal tract.Aims: The overall aims of this thesis were to study the epidemiology of ulcerative colitis in Örebro, Sweden; to examine certain aspects of anaemia in IBD; and to determine the clinical effectiveness of medical treatments.Material and methods: Cohort studies with the sampling frame defined by the geographic boundaries of the primary catchment area of Örebro University Hospital (Papers I‒III), or by the entire IBD population in Sweden registered in the Swedish national quality registry for IBD (SWIBREG; paper IV), were performed to determine the epidemiology of ulcerative colitis, the incidence and prevalence of anaemia in IBD, and the clinical effectiveness of thiopurine drugs and vedolizumab in routine care.Results: A fivefold increase in the incidence and a tenfold increase in the prevalence of ulcerative colitis was observed in Örebro during the past 50 years. In parallel, the prognosis, in terms of risk for colectomy within 10 years from diagnosis, improved during the same time period. Earlier and more widespread use of thiopurine drugs may have contributed to the decrease in colectomies. Anaemia is common in IBD, particularly in Crohn’s disease. Vedolizumab, a new drug targeting leucocyte migration to the gut, appears to be well tolerated and effective in Swedish real-world IBD care.Conclusion: Ulcerative colitis is on the rise, and data from Örebro indicate that the number of IBD patients in Sweden already exceeds 70,000. Improved knowledge of long-term outcomes of medical therapy may have far-reaching implications for future IBD management.
|
|
| 4. |
- Eriksson, Carl, 1981-, et al.
(författare)
-
Impact of thiopurines on the natural history and surgical outcome of ulcerative colitis : a cohort study
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Gut. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 0017-5749 .- 1468-3288. ; 68:4, s. 623-632
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: Thiopurines are used as maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC), but whether these drugs influence the natural history of the disease is unknown. We aimed to assess the effect of thiopurines in terms of colectomy, hospital admission, progression in disease extent and anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy within 10 years from initiation.DESIGN: Patients diagnosed with UC within the Örebro University Hospital catchment area, during 1963-2010, who initiated thiopurines (n=253) were included. To overcome the risk of confounding by indication, we compared patients who stopped treatment within 12 months because of an adverse reaction (n=76) with patients who continued therapy or discontinued due to other reasons (n=177) and assessed long-term outcomes using Cox regression with adjustment for potential confounding factors.RESULTS: The cumulative probability of colectomy within 10 years was 19.5% in tolerant patients compared with 29.0% in intolerant (adjusted HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.73). The probability of hospital admission was 34.0% in tolerant versus 56.2% in intolerant patients (adjusted HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.56). The risk for progression in disease extent was 20.4% in tolerant patients compared with 48.8% in intolerant (adjusted HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.21 to 1.06). Within 10 years, 16.1% of tolerant and 27.5% of intolerant patients received anti-TNF therapy (adjusted HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.92).CONCLUSION: Based on the novel approach of comparing patients tolerant and intolerant to thiopurines, we reveal that thiopurines have a profound beneficial impact of the natural history and long-term colectomy rates of UC.
|
|
| 5. |
- Eriksson, Carl, 1981-, et al.
(författare)
-
Incidence, prevalence and clinical outcome of anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease : a population-based cohort study
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. - : Blackwell Science Ltd.. - 0269-2813 .- 1365-2036. ; 48:6, s. 638-645
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The incidence and short-term outcome of anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are largely unknown.AIM: To determine the incidence, prevalence and clinical outcome of anaemia in terms of resolution of anaemia within 12 months. We also planned to assess risk factors for anaemia in IBD.METHODS: A random sample of 342 patients was obtained from the population-based IBD cohort of Örebro University Hospital, Sweden, consisting of 1405 patients diagnosed between 1963 and 2010. Haemoglobin measurements recorded from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2013 were extracted from the Clinical Chemistry data system.RESULTS: In Crohn's disease, the incidence rate of anaemia was 19.3 (95% CI: 15.4-23.7) per 100 person-years and the prevalence was 28.7% (CI: 22.0-36.2), compared with 12.9 (CI: 9.8-16.5) and 16.5% (CI: 11.2-22.9) for ulcerative colitis. Crohn's disease was associated with an increased incidence (OR = 1.60; CI: 1.02-2.51) and prevalence of anaemia (OR = 2.04; CI: 1.20-3.46) compared to ulcerative colitis. Stricturing disease phenotype in Crohn's disease (HR = 2.59; CI: 1.00-6.79) and extensive disease in ulcerative colitis (HR = 2.40; CI: 1.10-5.36) were associated with an increased risk of anaemia. Despite a higher probability of receiving specific therapy within 3 months from the diagnosis of anaemia, Crohn's disease patients had a worse outcome in terms of resolution of anaemia within 12 months (56% vs 75%; P = 0.03).CONCLUSIONS: Anaemia is a common manifestation of IBD even beyond the first years after the diagnosis of IBD. Crohn's disease is associated with both an increased risk and a worse outcome.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Karlqvist, Sara, 1992-
(författare)
-
Clinical aspects of biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease
- 2024
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) including its main subtypes, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic and recurrent inflammatory condition that affects the entire gastrointestinal system. Biological treatment has revolutionized the therapeutic armamentarium in the past two decades. The growing number of therapeutic options advocates for head-to-head comparisons, evaluation in clinical practice and assessment of safety. Therefore, this thesis aims to evaluate different facets of biological treatment in real-world cohorts.In Paper I, we examined the potential effectiveness of golimumab in Crohn’s disease using data from The Swedish National Quality Register for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SWIBREG). The findings indicate a drug retention rate of 35% after a median follow-up of 89 (IQR: 32–158) weeks. Paper II constituted a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study investigating the effectiveness of vedolizumab and its impact on quality of life in a Swedish clinical setting. The percentage of patients in clinical remission after 52 weeks was 41% for Crohn's disease and 47% for ulcerative colitis. Improvements in biochemical markers and health-related quality of life measures were observed at 12 and 52 weeks in both subtypes of IBD. In Paper III, second-line biological treatments were compared in propensity score-matched cohorts based on combined data from multiple high-quality Swedish nationwide registers. The effectiveness and safety of secondline anti-TNF and vedolizumab were similar at 12 months in Crohn’s disease (n=198) and ulcerative colitis (n=202). Based on propensity score-matched data from nationwide health registers, Paper IV showed that vedolizumab was associated with higher hazard ratios of serious infections than anti-TNF in Crohn’s disease but not in ulcerative colitis.To conclude, this thesis suggests that golimumab might have a role in treating Crohn’s disease. It also increased knowledge about the real-world effectiveness of vedolizumab. Lastly, the thesis underscored aspects of efficacy and safety when contrasting vedolizumab with anti-TNF.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Karlqvist, Sara, 1992-, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparative risk of serious infection with vedolizumab vs anti-TNF in Inflammatory Bowel Disease : Results from nationwide Swedish registers
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Journal of Crohn's & Colitis. - : Oxford University Press. - 1873-9946 .- 1876-4479. ; 18:Suppl. 1, s. I1291-I1293
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: The real-world comparative safety of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the risk of serious infection in IBD patients treated with vedolizumab, compared to (i) those treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) treatment and (ii) the general population.Methods: In this nationwide cohort study, treatment episodes were identified from Swedish health registers (from 1 May 2014 – 31 December 2020). Patients were considered exposed from initiation of treatment until 90 days after discontinuation of treatment. We used Cox regression with propensity score-matched cohorts to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for incident serious infection, defined as infection requiring hospital admission.Results: After propensity score matching, the cohorts were not materially different at baseline with regard to demographic, disease and treatment characteristics (Table 1). During 1376 treatment-episodes in patients with Crohn’s disease, there were 5.18 (95%CI: 3.98-6.63) serious infections per 100 person-years (PY) with vedolizumab vs 3.54 (95%CI: 2.50-4.85) per 100 PY with anti-TNF; HR 1.72 (95%CI: 1.12-2.65; Figure 1A). When examining site-specific infections in Crohn’s disease, vedolizumab was associated with an HR of 2.47 (95% CI: 0.96-6.39) for serious gastrointestinal infections. Compared to the rate of 0.75 (95%CI: 0.59-0.92) serious infections per 100 PY in the general population, vedolizumab demonstrated an increased HR of 7.00 (95%CI: 5.04-9.72).Across 1294 episodes among patients with ulcerative colitis there were 3.74 (95%CI: 2.66-5.11) serious infections per 100 PY with vedolizumab vs 3.42 (95%CI: 2.31-4.89) per 100 PY with anti-TNF, corresponding to HRs of 0.80 (95%CI: 0.47-1.36, Figure 1B) within the initial 1.1 years of treatment and 2.03 (95%CI: 0.65-6.32) after 1.1 years (follow-up truncated due to non-proportional hazards). In ulcerative colitis, there was no statistically significant association between vedolizumab treatment and any of the site-specific serious infections. Compared to the rate of 0.69 (95%CI: 0.53-0.87) serious infections per 100 PY in the general population, vedolizumab showed an increased HR of 5.45 (95%CI: 3.67-8.11).Conclusion: Vedolizumab was associated with higher hazard ratios of serious infections compared to anti-TNF in Crohn’s disease, but not in ulcerative colitis. Nonetheless, in both IBD subtypes vedolizumab exhibited increased hazard ratios compared to the general population. These results underscore the importance of heightened clinical awareness of infections in vedolizumab-treated patients and may help clinicians understanding the optimal positioning of vedolizumab.
|
|
| 10. |
- Karlqvist, Sara, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparative Risk of Serious Infection With Vedolizumab vs Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor in Inflammatory Bowel Disease : Results From Nationwide Swedish Registers
- 2024
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Gastroenterology. - : Blackwell Publishing. - 0002-9270 .- 1572-0241.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess the risk of serious infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with vedolizumab compared with those treated with anti-tumor necrosis factors (TNF) and the general population.METHODS: In this Swedish cohort study, treatment episodes were identified from nationwide health registers. We used Cox regression with propensity score-matched cohorts to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for incident serious infections, defined as infections requiring hospital admission.RESULTS: During 1,376 treatment episodes in Crohn's disease, the rate of serious infections per 100 person-years (PY) was 5.18 (95% CI = 3.98-6.63) with vedolizumab vs 3.54 (95% CI = 2.50-4.85) with anti-TNF; HR = 1.72 (95% CI = 1.12-2.65), partly explained by more gastrointestinal infections. Compared with the rate of 0.75/100 PY (95% CI = 0.59-0.92) in a matched general population cohort, vedolizumab demonstrated higher risk (HR = 7.00; 95% CI = 5.04-9.72). During 1,294 treatment episodes in ulcerative colitis, the corresponding rates were 3.74/100 PY (95% CI = 2.66-5.11) with vedolizumab vs 3.42/100 PY (95% CI = 2.31-4.89) with anti-TNF; HR = 0.80 (95% CI = 0.47-1.36) during the initial 1.1 years and HR = 2.03 (95% CI = 0.65-6.32) after 1.1 years (truncated due to nonproportional hazards). Pneumonia accounted for 40% of all infections among anti-TNF, whereas no case was observed among vedolizumab episodes. Compared with the rate of 0.69/100 PYs (95% CI = 0.53-0.87) in a matched general population cohort, vedolizumab showed an HR of 5.45 (95% CI = 3.67-8.11).DISCUSSION: Vedolizumab was associated with increased risks of serious infections compared with anti-TNF in Crohn's disease but not in ulcerative colitis. Nonetheless, the panorama of serious infections seemed to differ between the drugs. Our findings underscore the importance of clinical awareness of infections and the safety profile of the 2 therapies.
|
|
