| 1. |
- Kjeldsted, Eva, et al.
(författare)
-
Association between human papillomavirus status and health-related quality of life in oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer survivors
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Oral Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1368-8375. ; 109
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: The human papillomavirus (HPV) is a risk factor for a subgroup of head and neck cancers (HNC). HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNC patients encompass heterogeneous groups regarding risk factors, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, which may influence health-related quality of life (HRQL) differently. Since this has been sparsely studied, our study investigated the association between HPV status and HRQL in HNC survivors in Denmark. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study included 179 recurrence-free oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) survivors. HRQL was assessed on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. Linear and logistic regression models were adjusted for sociodemographic, clinical and lifestyle factors. Results: Most unadjusted results showed better HRQL among HPV-positive (n = 119) compared to HPV-negative (n = 60) OSCC survivors (average 18 months since diagnosis). After adjustments, the HPV-positive survivors reported higher role functioning (mean difference [MD] 9.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1 to –18.4), and fewer problems with speech (MD −9.0, 95% CI −18.0 to −0.1), sexuality (MD −21.9, 95% CI −38.0 to −5.9) and opening mouth (MD −13.7, 95% CI −26.6 to −0.8) compared to HPV-negative survivors. Conclusion: Our findings support that HPV-positive OSCC survivors experience better HRQL than HPV-negative survivors. However, results indicate that sociodemographic, clinical and lifestyle factors explain most of the association between HPV status and HRQL. Findings suggest increased focus on the HPV-negative OSCC survivors with deteriorated HRQL in rehabilitation programs and future research to investigate the long-term effects of treatment among HPV-positive OSCC survivors who may develop symptoms later in survivorship.
|
|
| 2. |
- Rasmussen, Nanna M. L., et al.
(författare)
-
Effectiveness of multidisciplinary nutritional support in older hospitalised patients : A systematic review and meta-analyses
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Clinical Nutrition ESPEN. - : Elsevier. - 2405-4577. ; 27, s. 44-52
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Malnutrition is common in older hospitalised patients. As the aetiology is multifactorial, nutritional care should involve a multidisciplinary team. However, the knowledge of the effectiveness of this strategy is limited. This systematic review aims at investigating the effectiveness of multidisciplinary nutritional support on mortality, readmissions and quality of life (QoL) in patients aged 65 years and above during hospitalisation and after discharge compared to usual practise. We conducted a series of systematic literature search from 2013 to 2017, with additional studies hand-searched from reference lists of retrieved publications. Eligible studies were controlled trials with a multidisciplinary nutritional intervention during hospitalisation and after discharge in older (65+) patients. A intervention by more than one profession incorporating a nutritional component was defined as "Multidisciplinary". The nutritional intervention included use of oral nutritional supplements (ONS), improved nutritional care, and/or dietary counselling. For quality assessment of studies, "Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias" was used. Conduction of meta-analyses were by combining data from homogenous trials. The search resulted in five studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria, but varied in quality and type of interventions used. 598 patients were included. Meta-analyses found improved QoL (MD 0.13 (0.02, 0.23), P = 0.01) and indicated tendencies towards lower mortality (OR 0.50 (0.22, 1.14), P = 0.10), in the intervention group vs. control group. Meta-analysis showed no difference between intervention and control group regarding readmissions during intervention (OR 1.04 (0.40, 2.70)) or at a 26 weeks follow-up (OR 0.84 (0.18, 3.82)) Although a small number of studies and a relatively small sample size, a suggestion is that provision of multidisciplinary nutritional support may have a positive effect on mortality and improves quality of life in older patients. There is a need for more high-quality studies including multidisciplinary nutritional support to verify these findings. Study registration in PROSPERO is no. CRD42016047997. (c) 2018 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
|
