| 1. |
- Dankiewicz, Josef, et al.
(author)
-
Infectious complications after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—A comparison between two target temperatures
- 2017
-
In: Resuscitation. - : Elsevier BV. - 0300-9572. ; 113, s. 70-76
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background It has been suggested that target temperature management (TTM) increases the probability of infectious complications after cardiac arrest. We aimed to compare the incidence of pneumonia, severe sepsis and septic shock after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in patients with two target temperatures and to describe changes in biomarkers and possible mortality associated with these infectious complications. Methods Post-hoc analysis of the TTM-trial which randomized patients resuscitated from OHCA to a target temperature of 33 °C or 36 °C. Prospective data on infectious complications were recorded daily during the ICU-stay. Pneumonia, severe sepsis and septic shock were considered infectious complications. Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive-protein (CRP) levels were measured at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after cardiac arrest. Results There were 939 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population. Five-hundred patients (53%) developed pneumonia, severe sepsis or septic shock which was associated with mortality in multivariate analysis (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.39; 95%CI 1.13–1.70; p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of infectious complications between temperature groups (sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.88; 95%CI 0.75–1.03; p = 0.12). PCT and CRP were significantly higher for patients with infections at all times (p < 0.001), but there was considerable overlap. Conclusions Patients who develop pneumonia, severe sepsis or septic shock after OHCA might have an increased mortality. A target temperature of 33 °C after OHCA was not associated with an increased risk of infectious complications compared to a target temperature of 36 °C. PCT and CRP are of limited value for diagnosing infectious complications after cardiac arrest.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Ebner, Florian, et al.
(author)
-
Associations between partial pressure of oxygen and neurological outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients : an explorative analysis of a randomized trial
- 2019
-
In: Critical Care. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1364-8535. ; 23:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: Exposure to hyperoxemia and hypoxemia is common in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients following return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), but its effects on neurological outcome are uncertain, and study results are inconsistent. METHODS: Exploratory post hoc substudy of the Target Temperature Management (TTM) trial, including 939 patients after OHCA with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The association between serial arterial partial pressures of oxygen (PaO2) during 37 h following ROSC and neurological outcome at 6 months, evaluated by Cerebral Performance Category (CPC), dichotomized to good (CPC 1-2) and poor (CPC 3-5), was investigated. In our analyses, we tested the association of hyperoxemia and hypoxemia, time-weighted mean PaO2, maximum PaO2 difference, and gradually increasing PaO2 levels (13.3-53.3 kPa) with poor neurological outcome. A subsequent analysis investigated the association between PaO2 and a biomarker of brain injury, peak serum Tau levels. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty-nine patients were eligible for analysis. Three hundred patients (35%) were exposed to hyperoxemia or hypoxemia at some time point after ROSC. Our analyses did not reveal a significant association between hyperoxemia, hypoxemia, time-weighted mean PaO2 exposure or maximum PaO2 difference and poor neurological outcome at 6-month follow-up after correction for co-variates (all analyses p = 0.146-0.847). We were not able to define a PaO2 level significantly associated with the onset of poor neurological outcome. Peak serum Tau levels at either 48 or 72 h after ROSC were not associated with PaO2. CONCLUSION: Hyperoxemia or hypoxemia exposure occurred in one third of the patients during the first 37 h of hospitalization and was not significantly associated with poor neurological outcome after 6 months or with the peak s-Tau levels at either 48 or 72 h after ROSC.
|
|
| 4. |
- Westhall, Erik, et al.
(author)
-
Standardized EEG interpretation accurately predicts prognosis after cardiac arrest
- 2016
-
In: Neurology. - 0028-3878. ; 86:16, s. 1482-1490
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: To identify reliable predictors of outcome in comatose patients after cardiac arrest using a single routine EEG and standardized interpretation according to the terminology proposed by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Methods: In this cohort study, 4 EEG specialists, blinded to outcome, evaluated prospectively recorded EEGs in the Target Temperature Management trial (TTM trial) that randomized patients to 33°C vs 36°C. Routine EEG was performed in patients still comatose after rewarming. EEGs were classified into highly malignant (suppression, suppression with periodic discharges, burst-suppression), malignant (periodic or rhythmic patterns, pathological or nonreactive background), and benign EEG (absence of malignant features). Poor outcome was defined as best Cerebral Performance Category score 3-5 until 180 days. Results: Eight TTM sites randomized 202 patients. EEGs were recorded in 103 patients at a median 77 hours after cardiac arrest; 37% had a highly malignant EEG and all had a poor outcome (specificity 100%, sensitivity 50%). Any malignant EEG feature had a low specificity to predict poor prognosis (48%) but if 2 malignant EEG features were present specificity increased to 96% (p <0.001). Specificity and sensitivity were not significantly affected by targeted temperature or sedation. A benign EEG was found in 1% of the patients with a poor outcome. Conclusions: Highly malignant EEG after rewarming reliably predicted poor outcome in half of patients without false predictions. An isolated finding of a single malignant feature did not predict poor outcome whereas a benign EEG was highly predictive of a good outcome.
|
|
