| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Demirbüker, S. Safer, et al.
(författare)
-
A Swedish nationwide pharmaco-epidemiological and genetic study of the long-term safety and effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (IMSE 5)
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Multiple Sclerosis Journal. - : Sage Publications. - 1352-4585 .- 1477-0970. ; 24:Suppl. 2, s. 701-702
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an oral therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), which has been included in the Swedish post-market surveillance study “Immunomodulation and Multiple Sclerosis Epidemiology 5” (IMSE 5) in order to monitor and determine the long-term safety and effectiveness in a real-world setting.Objectives: To follow-up the long-term safety and effectiveness of DMF in a real-world setting.Methods: MS patients are registered into the nationwide Swedish Neuro Registry (NeuroReg) in Sweden. The IMSE 5 study obtains descriptive data of adverse events (AEs), Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Severity Scale (MSSS), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), European Quality of Life - Five Dimensions Test (EQ-5D) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from NeuroReg. Drug survival was measured using the Kaplan-Meier curve and effectiveness measures were assessed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test.Results: 2010 DMF-treated patients have been included in the IMSE 5 study between March 2014 and April 2018. 73 % were female and the mean age at treatment start was 40.6 years. The mean treatment duration was 22.3 months. 92 % of the patients had RRMS with 2 % missing data on MS phenotype. Most patients switched from interferon and glaimer acetat (41 %) and 24 % of the patients were treatment naïve (13 % were missing data on prior treatment). The overall one year drug survival was 74 % and 889 patients terminated their treatment at some point. Most patients (39 %) switched to rituximab (15 % have no new treatment registered). The most common reason for discontinuation was AEs (53 %) and lack of effect (29 %). 227 (11 %) patients have continued treatment for ≥36 months. In patients treated with DMF continuously for ≥24 months (n=918), significant improvements in mean values at 24 months of treatment compared to mean baseline values have been noted for EDSS (1.9 ± 1.6 to 1.6 ± 1.6, n=196); MSSS (2.5 ± 2.4 to 2.0 ± 2.0, n=145); SDMT (52.6 ± 11.0 to 53.8 ± 11.7, n=315); MSIS-29 Psychological Subscale (26.3 ± 22.8 to 21.8 ± 20.6, n=337); and EQ-5D (0.76 ± 0.23 to 0.81 ± 0.20, n=284).Conclusions: NeuroReg proves to function well as a post-marketing drug surveillance platform, providing data regarding drug effectiveness and AEs. A longer follow-up period is needed to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of DMF.
|
|
| 3. |
- Efe, C., et al.
(författare)
-
Validation of Risk Scoring Systems in Ursodeoxycholic Acid-Treated Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis
- 2019
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Gastroenterology. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 0002-9270 .- 1572-0241. ; 114:7, s. 1101-1108
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: Risk stratification based on biochemical variables is a useful tool for monitoring ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)-treated patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Several UDCA response criteria and scoring systems have been proposed for risk prediction in PBC, but these have not been validated in large external cohorts. METHODS: We performed a study on data of 1746 UDCA-treated patients with PBC from 25 centers in Europe, United States, and Canada. The prognostic performance of the risk scoring systems (GLOBE and UK-PBC) and the UDCA response criteria (Barcelona, Paris I, Paris II, Rotterdam, and Toronto) were evaluated. We regarded cirrhosis-related complications (ascites, variceal bleeding, and/or hepatic encephalopathy) as clinical end points. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients reached a clinical end point during a median 7 years (range 1-16 years) of follow-up. The 5-, 10- and 15-year adverse outcome-free survivals were 95%, 85%, and 77%. The GLOBE and UK-PBC scores predicted cirrhosis-related complications better than the UDCA response criteria. The hazard ratio (HR) for a 1 standard deviation increase was HR 5.05 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.43-5.74, P < 0.001) for the GLOBE score and HR 3.39 (95% CI: 3.10-3.72, P < 0.001) for the UK-PBC score. Overall, the GLOBE and UK-PBC risk scores showed similar and excellent prognostic performance (C-statistic, 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91%-95% vs 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91%-0.96%). DISCUSSION: In our international, multicenter PBC cohort, the GLOBE and UK-PBC risk scoring systems were good predictors of future cirrhosis-related complications.
|
|
| 4. |
- Forsberg, L., et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate with focus on patients treated at least 36 months - a Swedish nationwide study of the long-term effectiveness and safety of dimethyl fumarate (IMSE5)
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Multiple Sclerosis Journal. - : Sage Publications. - 1352-4585 .- 1477-0970. ; 25:Suppl. 2, s. 316-317
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an oral therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). DMF is included in the Swedish post-market surveillance study “Immunomodulation and Multiple Sclerosis Epidemiology” (IMSE).Objective: To assess the effectiveness and safety of DMF with focus on patients treated at least 36 months in the IMSE study.Methods: Descriptive data of Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Severity Scale (MSSS), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions Test (EQ-5D), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Adverse Events (AEs) is obtained from the nationwide Swedish Neuro Registry (NeuroReg). Effectiveness measures were assessed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and drug survival using the Kaplan-Meier curve.Results: 2229 DMF-treated patients were included since March 2014 with a one- and two-year drug survival rate of 73% and 59%. The main reasons for discontinuation were AEs (51%) and lack of effect (29%). 77 AEs were reported to the Swedish Medical Products Agency of which 20 were serious. There were 6 fatal cases of which 4 were confirmed as unrelated to DMF and 2 were still under investigation.865 patients had continuous treatment for at least 36 months. This cohort had a mean age of 42 years and a mean treatment duration of 44 months. The majority had switched from interferon and glatiramer acetate (IFN&GA) (50%) or were treatment naïve (TN) (22%). Significant improvements in mean values at 36 months of treatment compared to baseline were noted for EDSS, MSSS, SDMT, MSIS-29 Psychological and EQ-5D. When TN patients were solely assessed improvements were noted for EDSS, MSSS, SDMT, MSIS-29 Physical and Psychological and EQ-5D. Treatment experienced patients displayed significant improvements only for MSSS and EQ-5D. Patients previously treated with IFN&GA also improved only in MSSS and EQ-5D. TN patients had a mean duration from diagnosis to treatment start of 6 months compared to 83 months for IFN&GA patients and 105 months for the remaining cohort.Conclusions: DMF demonstrates clinical improvements in patients treated ⩾ 36 months, most pronounced in TN patients. However; the tolerability of DMF was reduced since 41% interrupted treatment during the first 24 months of therapy. Continued follow up is needed to assess the effectiveness and safety of DMF over longer time periods in a real world setting.
|
|
| 5. |
- Hilbert-Carius, Peter, et al.
(författare)
-
Successfully REBOA performance: does medical specialty matter? International data from the ABOTrauma Registry
- 2020
-
Ingår i: World Journal of Emergency Surgery. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1749-7922. ; 15:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- © 2020, The Author(s). Background: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a minimally invasive procedure being increasingly utilized to prevent patients with non-compressible torso hemorrhage from exsanguination. The increased use of REBOA is giving rise to discussion about “Who is and who should be performing it?” Methods: Data from the international ABO (aortic balloon occlusion) Trauma Registry from between November 2014 and April 2020 were analyzed concerning the question: By who, how, and where is REBOA being performed? The registry collects retrospective and prospective data concerning use of REBOA in trauma patients. Results: During the study period, 259 patients had been recorded in the registry, 72.5% (n = 188) were males with a median (range) age of 46 (10-96) years. REBOA was performed in the ER in 50.5%, in the OR in 41.5%, and in the angiography suite in 8% of patients. In 54% of the patients REBOA was performed by surgeons (trauma surgeons 28%, vascular surgeons 22%, general surgeons 4%) and in 46% of the patients by non-surgeons (emergency physicians 31%, radiologists 9.5%, anesthetists 5.5%). Common femoral artery (CFA) access was achieved by use of external anatomic landmarks and palpation alone in 119 patients (51%), by cutdown in 57 patients (24%), using ultrasound in 49 patients (21%), and by fluoroscopy in 9 patients (4%). Significant differences between surgeons and non-surgeons were found regarding patient’s age, injury severity, access methods, place where REBOA was performed, location patients were taken to from the emergency room, and mortality. Conclusion: A substantial number of both surgical and non-surgical medical disciplines are successfully performing REBOA to an almost equal extent. Surgical cutdown is used less frequently as access to the CFA compared with reports in older literature and puncture by use of external anatomic landmarks and palpation alone is used with a high rate of success. Instead of discussing “Who should be performing REBOA?” future research should focus on “Which patient benefits most from REBOA?”
|
|
| 6. |
- Kågström, S., et al.
(författare)
-
A Swedish nationwide pharmaco-epidemiological and genetic study of the long-term safety and effectiveness of natalizumab (IMSE 1)
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Multiple Sclerosis Journal. - : Sage Publications. - 1352-4585 .- 1477-0970. ; 24:Suppl. 2, s. 699-700
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Natalizumab (NTZ) is a highly effective disease modulatory treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Post-marketing surveillance is important for determination of long-term safety and effectiveness in a real-world setting. To this end the “Immunomodulation and Multiple Sclerosis Epidemiology Study 1” (IMSE 1) was initiated upon NTZ launch in Sweden (Aug 2006).Objective: To follow-up the long-term safety and effectiveness of NTZ in a real-world setting.Methods: In Sweden MS patients are registered in the nationwide Swedish Neuro Registry (NeuroReg). IMSE 1 includes patients starting NTZ treatment and data is collected from NeuroReg. Adverse events (AEs), JC-virus status (JCV) and clinical effectiveness measures are registered prospectively.Results: 3052 patients (72% female; 82% RRMS; mean age at treatment start 36 years; mean treatment duration 45.9 months) have been included in IMSE 1 from August 2006 until April 2018. A total of 1234 RRMS patients where included year ≥2011 (JCV test introduction) and had information on JCV (482 anti-JCV anti-bodies (JCV+), 752 JCV negative (JCV-)). 691 of these patients were currently treated with NZT at cutoff date, 88 (13%) of which were JCV+ with a mean JCV index at 1.1±1.1. A total of 612/1234 (49%) discontinued NTZ treatment at some time point of which 266/403 (66%) JCV+ discontinued due to JCV+. JCV- patients mainly discontinued due to pregnancy/planning pregnancy (78/209, 37%) and other reasons (57/209, 27%). The one and two-year drug survival rate was 79% and 45% for JCV+ and 90% and 82% for JCV-. The overall drug survival rate was 16% for JCV+ and 72% for JCV-. In patients with continuous NTZ treatment for ≥2 years (n=738), long lasting stabilization of disease activity was observed. From year 2006 until cutoff, 96 Serious AEs had been reported to the Swedish MPA and included 8 cases (1 fatal) of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), reported between 2008 and 2012. A total of 14 patients have died during or within 6 months after NTZ discontinuation, as reported in NeuroReg. None were reported to be associated to NTZ.Conclusions: NeuroReg functions well as a post-marketing drug surveillance platform, providing long-term data on drug effects and AEs. NTZ is generally well tolerated with sustained effective-ness. The introduction of JCV testing has led to fewer treated JCV+ patients, which likely explains a reduced incidence of PML.
|
|
| 7. |
- Kågström, S., et al.
(författare)
-
Improved clinical outcomes in patients treated with natalizumab for at least 8 years - real-world data from a Swedish national post-marketing surveillance study (IMSE 1)
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Multiple Sclerosis Journal. - : Sage Publications. - 1352-4585 .- 1477-0970. ; 25:Suppl. 2, s. 763-764
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Natalizumab (NTZ) is a highly effective disease modulatory treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Post-marketing surveillance is important for evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness in a real-world setting. To this end the “Immunomodulation and Multiple Sclerosis Epidemiology Study” (IMSE 1) was initiated upon NTZ launch in Sweden (Aug 2006).Objective: To follow-up the long-term effectiveness and safety of NTZ in a real-world setting.Methods: In Sweden MS patients are registered in the nationwide Swedish Neuro Registry (NeuroReg). IMSE 1 includes patients starting NTZ treatment and data is collected from NeuroReg. Adverse events (AEs), JC-virus status (JCV) and clinical effec-tiveness measures are registered prospectively.Results: A total of 3141 patients were included in the IMSE 1 study from August 2006 until April 2019 (72% female; men age 35 years; 79% RRMS; mean treatment duration 50 months) and 288 had been treated for at least 96 months. 71% of these 288 patients (71% female; men age 37 years; 82% RRMS; mean treatment duration 118 months) were treated with interferons and glatiramer acetate prior NTZ. At some point of time, 31% (90/288) discontin-ued NTZ treatment of which 41% discontinued due to JCV posi-tive (JCV+). In total, 30% (86/288) of these patients were JCV+with a mean JCV index of 1.2±1.0 (6% missing data). Relapses before treatment were reduced from 388/1000 patient years to 54 during treatment, 62% were relapse-free and 17% had 1 relapse during the entire treatment period (12% missing data). All clinical effectiveness measures (Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Severity Scale (MSSS), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)) showed statistically significant improvement between baseline and 96 months. Over the entire observation time, 104 Serious AEs had been reported to the Swedish MPA and included 9 cases (2 fatal) of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) of which 8 between 2008 and 2012, and 1in 2018. 16 patients died during or within 6 months of last NTZ infusion. None were judged to be directly associated with NTZ.Conclusions: NTZ is generally well tolerated with sustained effectiveness regarding cognitive, physical and psychological measures, as well as relapse-control. Introduction of JCV testing has led to fewer treated JCV+ patients, which likely explains a drastic drop in the incidence of PML.
|
|
| 8. |
- Kågström, S., et al.
(författare)
-
Real-world longitudinal data of peginterferon beta-1a from a Swedish national post-marketing surveillance study (IMSE 6) - efficacy and safety profile
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Multiple Sclerosis Journal. - : Sage Publications. - 1352-4585 .- 1477-0970. ; 24:Suppl. 2, s. 927-928
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Subcutaneous peginterferon beta-1a (PegIFN) was approved for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Europe 2014. Phase II and III studies have shown that PegIFN reduces relapse rate and reduces the tendency to deteriorate disabilities. However, the long-term safety is important, therefore PegINF is included in the Swedish “Immunomodulation and Multiple Sclerosis Epidemiology Study 6” (IMSE 6). Which characterizes the real-world profile of PegIFN, including efficacy, safety, tolerability and patient outcome parameters.Objectives: To follow-up the long-term safety and effectiveness of PegIFN in a real-world setting.Methods: Approximately 60 collaborating neurology clinics continuously recruited PegIFN patients and documented clinical and demographic data in the nationwide Swedish Neuro Registry (NeuroReg). Data were obtained from NeuroReg between June 2015 and April 2018 for the IMSE 6 study.Results: A total of 324 patients (78% female; 88% RRMS; mean age at treatments start 43 years) were followed up to 34 months (mean 15 months) with 26% treatment naïve and 49% switched from other injectables. Mean duration from initial symptom(s) to treatment start was 114 months, and 69 months from MS diagnosis to treatment start. In total, 169 patients discontinued for vari-ous reasons (60% adverse events, 24% lack of effect) and switched mainly to rituximab (63 patients, 37%). The discontinuation rate at 12 months was 42.6%. Relapses before treatment were reduced from 207 to 130/1000 patient years during treatment. With 55% having no relapse and 9% having 1 relapse during treatment period (35% missing data). After 12 months, all clinical effectiveness measures (Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Severity Scale (MSSS), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), European Quality of Life - 5-Dimension test (EQ-5D), Visual Analogue Score (VAS), and the mean Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)) remained stable. A total number of 9 adverse events (6 serious: 1 gastrointestinal disorder, 2 general disorder and administrations site, 2 skin, 1 reproductive) were reported to Swedish Medical Product Agency (MPA).Conclusions: NeuroReg proves to function well as a post-marketing drug surveillance platform, providing data regarding drug effectiveness and AEs. This real-world study presentation from IMSE 6 shows a stable efficacy and safety profile in long-term clinical use.
|
|
| 9. |
- Longinetti, E., et al.
(författare)
-
COVID-19 clinical outcomes and DMT of MS patients and population-based controls
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. - : Wiley. - 2328-9503. ; 9:9, s. 1449-1458
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To estimate risks for all-cause mortality and for severe COVID-19 in multiple sclerosis patients and across relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients exposed to disease-modifying therapies. Methods: We conducted a Swedish nationwide population-based multi-register linkage cohort study and followed all multiple sclerosis patients (n = 17,692 in March 2020), individually age-, sex-, and region-matched to five population-based controls (n = 86,176 in March 2020) during March 2020-June 2021. We compared annual all-cause mortality within and across cohorts, and assessed incidence rates and relative risks for hospitalization, intensive care admission, and death due to COVID-19 in relation to disease-modifying therapy use, using Cox regression. Results: Absolute all-cause mortality among multiple sclerosis patients was higher from March to December 2020 than in previous years, but relative risks versus the population-based controls were similar to preceding years. Incidence rates of hospitalization, intensive care admission, and death due to COVID-19 remained in line with those for all-cause hospitalization, intensive care admission, and mortality. Among relapsing-remitting patients on rituximab, trends for differences in risk of hospitalization due to COVID-19 remained in the demographics-, socioeconomic status-, comorbidity-, and multiple sclerosis severity-adjusted model. Interpretation: Risks of severe COVID-19-related outcomes were increased among multiple sclerosis patients as a whole compared to population controls, but risk increases were also seen for non-COVID-19 hospitalization, intensive care admission, and mortality, and did not significantly differ during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic years. The risk conveyed by disease-modifying therapies was smaller than previously assumed, likely as a consequence of the possibility to better control for confounders.
|
|
| 10. |
- Alping, P., et al.
(författare)
-
Effectiveness of initial MS treatments in the COMBAT-MS trial : injectables, dimethyl fumarate, natalizumab and rituximab
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Multiple Sclerosis Journal. - : Sage Publications. - 1352-4585 .- 1477-0970. ; 27:Suppl. 2, s. 21-22
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Introduction: Direct comparisons across multiple disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) are valuable in clinical decision making. COMBAT-MS (NCT03193866) is an observational drug trial capturing data on clinical relapses, lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and drug survival, at all Swedish university clinics.Objective: Compare the effectiveness of the most common initial MS therapies in Sweden.Methods: All first-ever MS treatments with injectables (INJ, interferon-β/glatiramer acetate), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), natalizumab (NTZ), and rituximab (RTX), started 2011-01-01 to 2020-12-14, were identified with prospectively recorded outcome data in the Swedish MS Register. Follow-up continued even if the therapy ended. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation and potential confounding was adjusted for using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting with baseline variables: age, sex, MS duration, geographical region, EDSS, and relapses. All comparisons are made against RTX.Results: We included 1936 first-ever therapy episodes: 856 INJ, 341 DMF, 270 NTZ, and 469 RTX. Baseline characteristics differed by DMT, with natalizumab having the youngest patients, shortest MS duration, and the most previous relapses.After adjustment, the hazard ratio (HR) for first relapse vs RTX was for INJ 5.9 (95% confidence interval 3.7; 9.5), DMF 2.8 (1.7; 4.8), and NTZ 1.8 (1.0; 3.3). Similarly, the relative three-year lesion rate was for INJ 6.06 (3.75; 9.80), DMF 3.52 (2.01; 6.17), and NTZ 2.03 (1.14; 3.64). EDSS differences at three years were only marginally different: INJ 0.25 (0.06; 0.44), DMF 0.05 (-0.16; 0.26), and NTZ 0.00 (-0.23; 0.24). In contrast, HR for treatment discontinuation was marked: INJ 32.5 (19.0; 55.7), DMF 20.2 (11.5; 35.4), and NTZ 16.2 (8.9; 29.5).Conclusions: In treatment-naïve patients, RTX was associated with the lowest risk of relapses and MRI lesions, and by far the lowest probability of switching to a second therapy. In contrast, EDSS at 3 years was similar for RTX, DMF, and NTZ, and only slightly higher for INJ. The apparent difference in effectiveness between NTZ and RTX could possibly be explained by the vulnerable period after switching from NTZ, mainly due to JC virus positivity. These findings underscore the importance of tracking long-term outcomes from first DMT start, while considering subsequent therapy switches.
|
|
