| 1. |
- Noll, Gregor, 1964, et al.
(författare)
-
Visions
- 2019
-
Ingår i: War and algorithm / Edited by Max Liljefors, Gregor Noll and Daniel Steuer. - London/New York : Rowman & Littlefield International. - 9781786613646 ; , s. 191-204
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 2. |
- Noll, Gregor, 1964, et al.
(författare)
-
Introduction: Our Emerging World of War
- 2019
-
Ingår i: War and algorithm / Edited by Max Liljefors, Gregor Noll and Daniel Steuer.. - London/New York : Rowman & Littlefield International. - 9781786613646 ; , s. 1-8
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 3. |
- Noll, Gregor, 1964
(författare)
-
Life in the Ruins: International Law as Doctrine and Discipline
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Routledge Handbook of International Law and the Humanities. - Abingdon : Routledge. - 9780367420741 ; , s. 36-44
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this chapter I examine how the monastic order as a historical predecessor has shaped the discipline of international law and discuss the problems relating to the discipline’s attempts at secularisation. I argue that we should pursue a type of research which emphasises the process of secularisation in its practice, empirical as well as theoretical. Such an approach to research will not be able to limit itself to one area of knowledge but will be an interdisciplinary practice that simultaneously examines its disciplinary pre-conditions as well as the research matter. On this basis, I interpret the originality criterion as relating to the researcher’s ability to let the origin – Latin’s origo – emerge, rather than a display of personal creativeness.
|
|
| 4. |
-
War and Algorithm
- 2019
-
Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (refereegranskat)abstract
- New military technologies are animated by fantasies of perfect knowledge, lawfulness, and vision that contrast sharply with the very real limits of human understanding, law, and vision. 'War and Algorithm' look at the increasing power of algorithms in these emerging forms of warfare from the perspectives of critical theory, philosophy, legal studies, and visual studies. Together, the contributions of this book provide a first step toward understanding - and resisting – our emerging world of war.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Noll, Gregor, 1964
(författare)
-
War by Algorithm: The End of Law?
- 2019
-
Ingår i: War and algorithm / Edited by Max Liljefors, Gregor Noll and Daniel Steuer. - London/New York : Rowman & Littlefield International. - 9781786613646 ; , s. 75-104
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- It is not possible to subject algorithmic forms of warfare to the law, be it the law of war or any other form of law. This is so because subjection to the law presupposes a monotheistically structured process for its incarnation. As I have shown, there cannot be such a process in the case of weapons systems that fuse human and artificial intelligence. If we want to know how such a system works in practice, we need to test it on the scale relevant for its future use. As I have shown, this is impossible. For that reason, we cannot know whether it will operate in conformity with the law.
|
|
| 7. |
- Marques Pedro, Guilherme, 1984-
(författare)
-
The Human Right to Leave: But Whereto?
- 2022
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- While all persons — with a few exceptions — are allowed to leave any country regardless of nationality, not all persons are allowed to enter any country of their choosing; and only citizens enjoy, in principle, the right to enter their country of nationality, which most often, and by necessity, is a restricted number of countries, since some of them prohibit multiple nationality. One claim that is frequently made in contemporary migration-related literature, and that much migration-related philosophical debate presupposes in one way or another, yet remains unexplored, is the claim that the right to leave a state – enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 – does not entail a right to enter another state. This claim is typically made in relation or conjunction with another (set of) claims: that this alleged state of affairs is wrong somehow, or vice versa, that it is not. This dissertation deals with both claims and offer a first systematic study of these. On the one hand, the aforementioned descriptive claim has caught the attention of many observers who have, for the most part, taken it as a fairly undisputed description of current international law. I defend the view I call descriptive legal symmetrism, according to which there already is a form of symmetry between entry and exit rights, albeit not the one that most scholars set out to look for. On the other hand, in the context of the normative set of claims made by some authors concerning whether this alleged state of affairs is either immoral or unlawful (or both) in that it would expose the migrant to moral injustice and a protection gap in the contemporary human rights regime (namely, that of having, after leaving a country, nowhere to go), I submit that the object of disagreement in the normative legal debate concerns whether or not we ought to use the law to enforce what I call ‘Proposition A’: ‘it is permitted that any person leaves any country (besides justified exceptions), therefore it is obligatory that all states permit entry (besides justified exceptions)’. I conclude that much of the debate focuses on matters that, albeit interesting in their own right, might not be what is at stake. I hope to contribute to the normative discussion by sorting out the different positions, illustrating their truth-making conditions, and stressing where a position depends on problematic assumptions.
|
|
| 8. |
- Noll, Gregor, 1964
(författare)
-
Putin vill vantolka folkrätten till sin fördel
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Svenska Dagbladet. - 1101-2412.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- I dag är det av största vikt att vi förstår tanken bakom den alternativa folkrätten som Putin försöker lansera. Jag läser Putins tal den 24 februari 2022 genom den tyske folkrättstänkaren Carl Schmitts en skrift om Grossraum, publicerad 1939. Putins stundom dunkla tal blir lättare att begripa, och hans kommande steg borde bli mera förutsägbara. Vi får en föraning om vad en Putinsk folkrätt skulle innebära, inte minst för mindre stater, en grupp som Sverige idag tillhör.
|
|
