SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Olsson Erik J.) ;pers:(Enqvist Sebastian)"

Sökning: WFRF:(Olsson Erik J.) > Enqvist Sebastian

  • Resultat 1-7 av 7
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  •  
2.
  • Enqvist, Sebastian, et al. (författare)
  • A Structuralist Framework for the Logic of Theory Change
  • 2011
  • Ingår i: Belief revision meets philosophy of science. - 9789048196081
  • Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
    • Belief revision theory and philosophy of science both aspire to shed light on the dynamics of knowledge – on how our view of the world changes (typically) in the light of new evidence. Yet these two areas of research have long seemed strangely detached from each other, as witnessed by the small number of cross-references and researchers working in both domains. One may speculate as to what has brought about this surprising, and perhaps unfortunate, state of affairs. One factor may be that while belief revision theory has traditionally been pursued in a bottom- up manner, focusing on the endeavors of single inquirers, philosophers of science, inspired by logical empiricism, have tended to be more interested in science as a multi-agent or agent-independent phenomenon.
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  • Carlsnaes, Walter, 1943-, et al. (författare)
  • Editors' Introduction
  • 2011. - 1
  • Ingår i: Foreign Policy Analysis. - London : Sage Publications. - 9781412921442 ; 3:1, s. 7-12
  • Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
  •  
5.
  •  
6.
  • Genot, Emmanuel, et al. (författare)
  • The Best of All PossibleWorlds: Where Interrogative Games Meet Research Agendas
  • 2011
  • Ingår i: Belief Revision Meets Philosophy of Science. - Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands. - 9789048196081 - 9789048196098 ; 21, s. 225-252
  • Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Erik J. Olsson and David Westlund have recently argued that the standard belief revision representation of an epistemic state is defective. In order to adequately model an epistemic state one needs, in addition to a belief set (or corpus, or theory, i.e. a set closed under deduction) K and (say) an entrenchment relation E, a research agenda A, i.e. a set of questions satisfying certain corpus-relative preconditions (hence called K-questions) the agent would like to have answers to. Informally, the preconditions guarantee that the set of potential answers represent a partition of possible expansions of K, hence are equivalent to well-behaved sets of alternative hypotheses.
  •  
7.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-7 av 7

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy