| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Sundell, K., et al.
(författare)
-
Multisystemisk terapi för ungdomar med allvarliga beteendeproblem : Resultat efter sex månader
- 2006
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Multisystemisk terapi (MST) är en strukturerad familje- och närmiljöbaserad öppenvårdsbehandling. Insatserna riktar sig mot de viktigaste systemen som en ung människa finns i – familjen, skolan och kamratkretsen—och man arbetar med alla dessa system samtidigt. I den här rapporten beskrivs hur MST fungerar jämfört med mer traditionella insatser inom socialtjänsten. Undersökningsgruppen består av 156 ungdomar i åldrarna 12-17 år med allvarlig beteendestörning, som fördelats till MST eller traditionell behandling. Resultaten efter sex månader visar inga större skillnader mellan grupperna. Eftersom n’ästan hälften av MST-insatserna fortfarande pågick vid uppföljningstillfället, kan inga säkra slutsatser dras om hur MST fungerar jämfört med de insatser som brukar ges till dessa ungdomar i Sverige. En rekommendation till kommuner som ännu inte startat MST-team är därför att invänta 24-månadersresultaten. Samtidigt finns det ingen anledning för dem som redan inrättat team att avveckla verksamheten, eftersom MST fungerat lika bra som alternativen. Den nu pågående tvåårsuppföljningen kommer at ge ett säkrare svar på frågan om hur MST fungerar i Sverige.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Biberhofer, P, et al.
(författare)
-
Joint CASE Report on Content and Methods for the Joint Master Program on Sustainability-driven Entrepreneurship
- 2016
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The CASE project develops a joint master program on sustainability-driven entrepreneurship in a university-business knowledge alliance. However, it is not only for the development of the master program that university opens up to consider and integrate further stakeholder perspectives into the process. The future students shall learn in a transdisciplinary learning environment, steadily researching and integrating real-world needs and perspectives to develop competencies that enable them to solve complex sustainability-problems in their further careers. In the CASE project, we aim to avoid the indicated gap between sustainability-oriented, real-world contents and not corresponding pedagogical frameworks. We connect the development of contents and methods in the two interlinked work packages 3 and 4 in terms of process and outcomes (see Figure 1 for an overview of the WPs that contribute to the development of the master program). WP 3 is focusing on relevant content areas for the master program and WP 4 is analyzing innovative methods to foster competencies of sustainability-driven entrepreneurship. The output of the two WPs is this joint report describing the joint development process, giving background information on relevant content areas for sustainability-driven entrepreneurship and adequate teaching and learning approaches. In the course of the development process of WP 3 and WP 4 we considered different regional requirements and needs of the universities that are part of the CASE consortium and further stakeholders via participatory multi-stakeholder workshops. In chapter 1.3 we describe this process in detail and particularly elaborate on the multi-stakeholder approach chosen in the CASE project. This development process first covered clustering relevant topics to thematic areas, then structuring these into modules and courses with various teaching formats. Finally, we added recommendations for concrete teaching and learning methods. The report outlines modules for a master program that are designed to foster competencies of sustainability-driven entrepreneurship. Since the overarching aim of the CASE project is to develop a joint master program that can be adopted by various European universities, we are ambitious to create modules which are adaptable and can flexibly be implemented in different regional contexts and under differing conditions of universities. With this report, we are sharing our knowledge and experiences gained so far to make them accessible to HEIs, company partners and all other stakeholders interested in the topic of sustainability-driven entrepreneurship and in innovative teaching and learning methods.
|
|
| 9. |
- Brown, Calum, et al.
(författare)
-
Understanding farmer uptake of measures that support biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) : An EKLIPSE Expert Working Group report
- 2019
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Recent scientific research highlights the urgent need to protect Europe’s remaining – and rapidly declining– biological diversity. The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is one of the major tools with which policymakers in the European Union (EU) can achieve this aim. However, so far, the CAP has proved largely ineffective – or even detrimental – to this goal. With relatively localised exceptions, the Policy’s notable success in ensuring supplies of food and fiber by supporting Europe’s farmers has been at the expense of environmental objectives. This report presents the findings of an Expert Working Group (EWG) convened to explore the ways in which the Common Agricultural Policy could be made more effective in protecting biodiversity and delivering associated ecosystem services, particularly through the implementation of effective biodiversity measures by Europe’s farmers. The EWG was established with a focus on Ecological Focus Areas (EFAs), a policy instrument introduced tothe CAP in the period 2014 - 2020, who broadened this remit to also consider evidence from other measures. In the first of three main strands of research (Step A), we synthesised the findings of recent reviews that investigate the most beneficial measures for biodiversity on farmland. In the second (Step B), we reviewed the factors affecting the design and selection of these measures at European, national and farm scales. In the third (Step C), we used our findings to develop recommendations for improving the impacts of the CAP on biodiversity and associated ecosystem services. The bulk of our work focused on Step B, in particular a new assessment of factors affecting farmer’s uptake of relevant measures, and a series of interviews with farmers’ representatives to further develop our insights and findings.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
