| 1. |
- Martling, Anna, et al.
(author)
-
New trends in rectal cancer treatment.
- 2014
-
In: Colorectal Cancer. - : Future Medicine Ltd. - 1758-194X .- 1758-1958. ; 3:2, s. 215-222
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- SUMMARY The treatment philosophy for rectal cancer has changed a lot during the last three decades. In the 1970s it was more or less a pure surgical business and rectal cancer was considered radiation resistant. Owing to the unacceptable high local recurrence rates, surgery was changed (the total mesorectal excision technique) during the 1980s and treatment was, in many countries, concentrated to lager units. Moreover, the addition of adjuvant radiotherapy was tested during the same period in several randomized trials and demonstrated that the local recurrence rate could be reduced by 50%, provided the radiation dose was high enough. Since then, treatment has changed very rapidly with several interesting approaches, such as timing and type of radiotherapy, the place of chemotherapy, surgery with modern technique including laparoscopy; natural orifice transendoscopic surgery or robotics; and the whole idea of ‘wait-and-watch’ program. All of these new aspects are covered and discussed in the view of the standard-of-care in 2014.
|
|
| 2. |
- Penninckx, Freddy, et al.
(author)
-
Letter from the ESCP Executive
- 2011
-
In: Colorectal Disease. - : Wiley. - 1462-8910 .- 1463-1318. ; 13:10, s. 1188-1189
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 3. |
- Pettersson, D., et al.
(author)
-
Interim analysis of the Stockholm III trial of preoperative radiotherapy regimens for rectal cancer
- 2010
-
In: British Journal of Surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 97:4, s. 580-587
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: To address issues regarding the fractionation of radiotherapy (RT) and timing of surgery for rectal cancer, a multicentre trial has randomized patients to preoperative short-course RT with two different intervals to surgery, or long-course RT with delayed surgery. The present interim analysis assessed feasibility, compliance and complications after RT and surgery. METHODS: Some 303 patients were randomized to either short-course RT (5 x 5 Gy) and surgery within 1 week (group 1), short-course RT and surgery after 4-8 weeks (group 2) or long-course RT (25 x 2 Gy) and surgery after 4-8 weeks (group 3). RESULTS: Demographic data were similar between groups and there were few protocol violations (5.0-6 per cent). Eight patients (2.6 per cent) developed radiation-induced acute toxicity. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between groups (46.6, 40.0 and 32 per cent in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively; P = 0.164). Patients receiving short-course RT with surgery 11-17 days after the start of RT had the highest complication rate (24 of 37). CONCLUSION: Compliance was acceptable and severe acute toxicity was low, irrespective of fractionation. Short-course RT with immediate surgery had a tendency towards more postoperative complications, but only if surgery was delayed beyond 10 days after the start of RT. Registration number: NCT00904813 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
|
|
| 4. |
- van Leeuwen, Barbara L., et al.
(author)
-
The effect of age and gender on outcome after treatment for colon carcinoma : A population-based study in the Uppsala and Stockholm region
- 2008
-
In: Critical reviews in oncology/hematology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1040-8428 .- 1879-0461. ; 67:3, s. 229-236
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- RATIONALE: The aim of this study was to assess whether there are differences in treatment strategy and outcome between different age cohorts among men and women with colon cancer. METHODS: All patients with colon cancer included in the regional quality registry in Uppsala/Orebro and Stockholm between 1996 and December 2004 were analysed (n=11002). Patients were divided into three age categories: < or =65 years, 66-80 years and >80 years. RESULTS: Overall and cancer-specific survival decreased with increasing age for stages II and III colon cancer but was not influenced by gender. Older patients with stage III tumours were less likely to be referred for chemotherapeutic treatment and there was a decrease in cancer-specific survival with increasing age, from 63.7% to 51.0% to 38.4% in the three age groups. Postoperative morbidity and the number of reoperations was significantly higher in men than in women. CONCLUSION: The present study shows lower cancer-specific survival among older patients than among younger patients. Gender was not a prognostic factor in cancer-specific survival.
|
|
