| 1. |
- Offermann, Anne, et al.
(författare)
-
TRIM24 as an independent prognostic biomarker for prostate cancer
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Urologic Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 1078-1439 .- 1873-2496. ; 37:9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Simply applicable biomarkers for prostate cancer patients predicting the clinical course are urgently needed. Recently, TRIM24 has been identified to promote androgen receptor signaling and to correlate with an aggressive prostate cancer phenotype. Based on these data, we proofed TRIM24 as a prognostic biomarker for risk stratification.Materials and Methods: We performed TRIM24 immunohistochemistry on 2 independent cohorts including a total of 806 primary tumors, 26 locally advanced/recurrent tumors, 30 lymph node metastases, 30 distant metastases, and 129 benign prostatic samples from 497 patients as well as on 246 prostate needle biopsies. Expression data were correlated with clinic-pathological data including biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) as endpoint.Results: Benign samples show no or low TRIM24 expression in 94%, while tumor tissues demonstrate significant higher levels. Strongest expression is observed in advanced and metastatic tumors. In multivariate analyses, TRIM24 up-regulation on radical prostatectomy specimens correlates with shorter bRFS independent of other prognostic parameters. 5-(10-) year bRFS rates for TRIM24 negative, low, medium and high expressing tumors are 93.1(93.1)%, 75.4(68.5)%, 54.9(47.5)% and 43.1(32.3)%, respectively. Of interest, tumors diagnosed as indolent disease, TRIM24 expression stratifies patients into specific risk groups. Increased TRIM24 expression associates with higher grade group, positive nodal status and extraprostatic tumor growth. TRIM24 assessment on prostate needle biopsies taken prior to treatment decision at time of initial diagnosis significantly correlates with recurrence after surgery.Conclusion: Using 2 large independent radical prostatectomy specimen cohorts, we found that TRIM24 expression predicts patients' risk to develop disease recurrence with high accuracy and independent from other established biomarkers. Further, this is the first study exploring TRIM24 expression on prostate needle biopsies which represents the clinically relevant tissue type on which biomarkers guide treatment decisions. Thus, we strongly suggest introducing TRIM24 evaluation in prostate needle biopsies in clinical routine as an inexpensive and simple immunohistochemical test.
|
|
| 2. |
- Offermann, Anne, et al.
(författare)
-
TRIM24 as Independent Prognostic Marker in Prostate Cancer
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Modern Pathology. - : Nature Publishing Group. - 0893-3952 .- 1530-0285. ; 31:Suppl. 2, s. 372-373
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Simply applicable biomarkers for prostate cancer (PCa) predicting the clinical course are urgently needed. Recently, TRIM24 has been identified to promote androgen-receptor signaling and to correlate with poor outcome. Based on these data, we validated TRIM24 as a prognostic biomarker for PCa.Design: We performed TRIM24 immunohistochemistry on two independent cohorts including a total of 806 primary tumors, 26 locally advanced/recurrent tumors, 30 lymph node metastases, 30 distant metastases and 129 benign prostatic samples from 497 patients. Expression data were correlated with clinic-pathological data including biochemical recurrence free survival (bRFS) as endpoint.Results: Benign samples show no/low TRIM24 expression in 94%, while tumors demonstrate significantly higher levels. Strongest expression is observed in metastatic tumors. In multivariate analyses, TRIM24 up-regulation correlates with shorter bRFS independent of other prognostic parameters. 5-(10-) year bRFS rates for TRIM24 negative, low, medium and high expressing tumors are 93.1(93.1)%, 75.4(68.5)%, 54.9(47.5)% and 43.1(32.3)%, respectively. Of interest, tumors diagnosed as indolent disease, TRIM24 expression stratifies patients into specific risk groups. Increased TRIM24 expression associates with higher Grade Group, positive nodal status and extraprostatic tumor growth.Conclusions: Using two large independent cohorts, we found that TRIM24 expression predicts patients’ risk to develop disease recurrence with high accuracy and independently from other established prognostic markers. To our knowledge, TRIM24 is the first prognostic biomarker to be independent, accurate and reproducible on three different primary PCa cohorts. Thus, we strongly suggest introducing TRIM24 in clinical routine as a simple immunohistochemical test.
|
|
| 3. |
- Perner, Sven, et al.
(författare)
-
ERG Rearrangement Metastasis Patterns in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Urology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0090-4295 .- 1527-9995. ; 75:4, s. 762-767
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES To interrogate multifocal prostate cancer (PCa) to determine its predilection for metastasis, using ERG rearrangement as marker of clonality. A hallmark of PCa is that distinct tumor foci may arise independently, which has important biological and clinical implications. Recent studies characterizing ERG-rearranged PCa possessing intrafocal homogeneity but interfocal heterogeneity support this hypothesis. METHODS We studied 26 patients who underwent prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy with at least 2 distinct PCa foci and 1 lymph node (LN) metastasis. Each focus was assessed for size, Gleason score, ERG rearrangement, and TMPRSS2-ERG transcript. RESULTS Fifteen of 26 cases exhibited interfocal homogeneity with regard to ERG rearrangement (ie, presence vs absence of ERG rearrangement). ERG rearrangement was present in all foci for 6 and absent in all foci for 9 cases. Two cases revealed interfocal heterogeneity with regard to rearrangement mechanism ( ie, rearrangement through insertion or deletion). Eight of 26 cases revealed interfocal heterogeneity with regard to rearrangement status. In all cases with at least 1 ERG rearranged focus, we found the corresponding LN metastasis harboring an ERG rearrangement. Interestingly, in a subset of cases the rearrangement status in the LN did not correspond to size or Gleason score. All but 2 ERG rearranged foci had detectable TMPRSS2-ERG transcript levels. CONCLUSIONS When multifocal PCa demonstrates both ERG-positive and ERG-negative foci, the positive foci have a greater predilection for metastasis. Larger studies are needed to confirm the potential additional risk an ERG rearranged focus confers on the likelihood of disease progression. UROLOGY 75: 762-767, 2010. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
|
|
