| 1. |
- Kappetein, Arie Pieter, et al.
(författare)
-
Design and rationale for a randomised comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in selected patients with left main coronary artery disease : the EXCEL trial
- 2016
-
Ingår i: EuroIntervention. - 1774-024X .- 1969-6213. ; 12:7, s. 861-872
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is the standard of care for revascularisation of patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD). Recent studies have suggested that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) may provide comparable outcomes in selected patients with LMCAD without extensive CAD. We therefore designed a trial to investigate whether PCI with XIENCE cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES) would result in non-inferior or superior clinical outcomes to CABG in selected patients with LMCAD. Methods and results: The Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial is a prospective, open-label, multicentre, international study of 1,900 randomised subjects. Patients with significant LMCAD with a SYNTAX score <= 32 and local Heart Team consensus that the subject is appropriate for revascularisation by both PCI and CABG are consented and randomised 1:1 to undergo PCI using CoCr-EES or CABG. All patients undergo follow-up for five years. The primary endpoint is the three-year composite rate of death, stroke or myocardial infarction, assessed at a median follow-up of at least three years (with at least two-year follow-up in all patients), powered for sequential non-inferiority and superiority testing. Conclusions: The EXCEL study will define the contemporary roles of CABG and PCI using XIENCE CoCr-EES in patients with LMCAD disease with low and intermediate SYNTAX scores.
|
|
| 2. |
- Gregson, John, et al.
(författare)
-
Recurrent Events in Cardiovascular Trials: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. - 1558-3597. ; 82:14, s. 1445-1463
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Many randomized trials in cardiovascular disease have repeat nonfatal events (such as hospitalizations) occurring during patient follow-up; yet, it remains common practice to have time-to-first event as the primary outcome. We explore the value of analyses that include repeat events. Do they help us understand the effect of treatment and total disease burden? Do they enhance statistical power? Should they become a trial's primary analysis? It may also be difficult to choose which of the various statistical methods for analyzing repeat events to use, and we provide a nontechnical guide to what each method is doing. We compare several methods for repeat events: Lin Wei Yang Ying, negative binomial, joint frailty, win ratio, and area under the curve. We illustrate their performance in 5 large cardiovascular trials and compare them with time-to-first-event analyses. We review their use in recently published heart failure trials and make recommendations for their use in future trials.
|
|
