| 1. |
- Feldman, I., et al.
(författare)
-
Effectiveness of the Salut Program : a universal health promotion intervention for parents & children
- 2016
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Public Health. - : Oxford University Press. - 1101-1262 .- 1464-360X. ; 26:Suppl 1, s. -253
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: There is a lack of evidence for the effectiveness of health promotion interventions during pregnancy and early childhood. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the Salut Programme, a universal health promotion intervention in a Swedish County, compared to care as usual.Methods: A register-based retrospective observational study design is used with respect to both exposures and outcomes. Outcomes of interest during pregnancy, delivery and the child’s first three years of life included: direct indications of health risks, such as birth weight, Apgar scores, hospitalization, delivery; and indicators of poor health, such as child’s and mother’s hospital visits, and parents’ number of paid days for care of sick child. We compared outcomes of interest for both parents and children during pre- (children born 2002-2004) and post- (born 2006-2008) measure periods for the intervention (n = 1891 children, n = 1599 mothers), and non-intervention groups (n = 12723 children, n = 10544 mothers). Our analysis strategy combined difference-in-difference estimation with matching. A complementary analysis was carried out on the longitudinal subsample of women who gave birth in both the pre- and post- measure periods.Results: No significant changes were found in the difference-in-difference analysis. A few significant changes were found between intervention and non-intervention groups in the longitudinal analysis; for the Apgar scores 1 and 5 minutes (p < 0.001), and hospitalization during the first three years after birth for mothers (p = 0.002).Conclusions: Adding the Salut Programme to the care as usual provided minor effects on children’s and mothers’ health, for the outcomes used in this study. However, the health outcomes may impact child public health in the long-time perspective.Key message: In this study of the effectiveness of a universal health promotion intervention, the Salut Programme, some positive impact was found on child and maternal health outcomes
|
|
| 2. |
- Häggström, Jenny, et al.
(författare)
-
Is the Salut Programme an effective and cost-effective universal health promotion intervention for parents and their children? : a register-based retrospective observational study
- 2017
-
Ingår i: BMJ Open. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2044-6055. ; 7:9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Salut Programme, a universal health promotion intervention, compared with care-as-usual, over the periods of pregnancy, delivery and the child's first 2 years of life.METHOD: We adopted a register-based retrospective observational design using existing data sources with respect to both exposures and outcomes. Health outcomes and costs were compared between geographical areas that received care-as-usual (non-Salut area) and areas where the programme was implemented (Salut area). We included mothers and their children from both the Salut and non-Salut areas if: (1) the child was born 2002-2004 (premeasure period) or (2) the child was born 2006-2008 (postmeasure period). The effectiveness study adopted two strategies: (1) a matched difference-in-difference analysis using data from all participants and (2) a longitudinal analysis restricted to mothers who had given birth twice, that is, both in the premeasure and postmeasure periods. The economic evaluation was performed from a healthcare and a limited societal perspective. Outcomes were clustered during pregnancy, delivery and birth and the child's first 2 years.RESULTS: Difference-in-difference analyses did not yield any significant effect on the outcomes. Longitudinal analyses resulted in significant positive improvement in Apgar scores, reflecting the newborn's physical condition, with more children having a normal Apgar score (1 min +3%, 5 min +1%). The cost of the programme was international dollar (INT$)308/child. From both costing perspectives, the programme yielded higher effects and lower costs than care-as-usual, being thus cost-saving (probability of around 50%).CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the Salut Programme is an effective universal intervention to improve maternal and child health, and it may be good value for money; however, there is large uncertainty around the cost estimates.
|
|
| 3. |
- Pulkki-Brännström, Anni-Maria, et al.
(författare)
-
The equity impact of a universal child health promotion programme
- 2019
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Public Health. - : Oxford University Press. - 1101-1262 .- 1464-360X. ; 29:Suppl 4, s. 103-103
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: We aimed to evaluate whether the Salut Programme, a universal child health promotion intervention, aimed to strengthen healthy lifestyles in northern Sweden, had any effect on income-related inequalities in positive birth outcomes for children and on healthcare use for children and their mothers.Methods: Mother’s residence and child’s date of birth determined whether the child and the mother belonged to the control group (areas that received care-as-usual) or the intervention group (areas with the intervention implemented from 2005), during the pre-measure period (children born 2002-2004) and the post-measure period (children born 2006-2008). The sum of parents’ taxable income was used for socioeconomic ranking. We computed the standard concentration index for six binary indicators of positive birth outcomes, and for inpatient and day patient care for children and mothers during the two years after delivery. Using a difference-in-difference approach, we assessed whether the extent of inequality changed over time between areas.Results: Income-related inequalities in child health status at birth and in child healthcare use were absent, except that full-term pregnancies were concentrated among the poor at pre-measure in the intervention group. However, mothers’ healthcare use was significantly pro-poor in the control group. The extent of inequality changed between pre- and post-measure periods for two outcomes: the pro-poor concentration of full-term pregnancies in the intervention group at pre-measure disappeared at post-measure; and an increase in pro-poor concentration of normal birth weight in the control group was not matched by a similar increase in the intervention group. Inequalities in healthcare use did not change significantly.Conclusions: Birth outcomes and child healthcare use seemed to be equitably distributed. However, the results raise concerns whether the intervention may have reduced the pro-poor concentration of positive birth outcomes.Key messagesThere are concerns that participation in universal health promotion programmes differs by socioeconomic status, although few public health interventions have been evaluated from an equity perspective.Birth outcomes and child healthcare use in Northern Sweden seemed to be equitably distributed across different socioeconomic groups.
|
|
| 4. |
- Pulkki-Brännström, Anni-Maria, et al.
(författare)
-
The equity impact of a universal child health promotion programme
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 0143-005X .- 1470-2738. ; 74, s. 605-611
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Real-world evaluations of complex interventions are scarce. We evaluated the effect of the Salut Programme, a universal child health promotion intervention in northern Sweden, on income-related inequalities in positive birth outcomes and healthcare utilisation up to 2 years after delivery.METHODS: Using the mother's place of residence at delivery, the child and the mother were classified as belonging to either the control area (received care-as-usual) or the intervention area (where the intervention was implemented from 2006) and either the premeasure (children born between 2002 and 2004) or the postmeasure (children born between 2006 and 2008) period. Parents' earned income was used as the socioeconomic ranking variable. The Relative Concentration Index was computed for six binary birth outcome indicators and for inpatient and day patient care for children and their mothers. Changes in inequality over time were compared using a difference-in-difference approach.RESULTS: Income-related inequalities in birth outcomes and child healthcare utilisation were absent, except that full-term pregnancies were concentrated among the poor at premeasure in the intervention area. In contrast, mothers' healthcare utilisation was significantly pro-poor in the control area. The extent of inequality changed differentially between premeasure and postmeasure for two birth outcomes: full-term pregnancies and infants with normal birth weight. Inequalities in healthcare utilisation did not change significantly in either area over time.CONCLUSION: In northern Sweden, income-related inequalities in birth outcomes and child healthcare utilisation are largely absent. However, relative inequalities in mothers' healthcare utilisation are large. We found no evidence that the Salut Programme affected changes in inequality over time.
|
|
| 5. |
- Sampaio, Filipa, PhD, 1985-, et al.
(författare)
-
Health and economic outcomes of a universal early intervention for parents and children from birth to age five : evaluation of the Salut Programme using a natural experiment
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 1478-7547. ; 21:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the health and economic outcomes of a universal early intervention for parents and children, the Salut Programme, from birth to when the child completed five years of age.Methods: This study adopted a retrospective observational design using routinely collected linked register data with respect to both exposures and outcomes from Västerbotten county, in northern Sweden. Making use of a natural experiment, areas that received care-as-usual (non-Salut area) were compared to areas where the Programme was implemented after 2006 (Salut area) in terms of: (i) health outcomes, healthcare resource use and costs around pregnancy, delivery and birth, and (ii) healthcare resource use and related costs, as well as costs of care of sick child. We estimated total cumulative costs related to inpatient and specialised outpatient care for mothers and children, and financial benefits paid to mothers to stay home from work to care for a sick child. Two analyses were conducted: a matched difference-in difference analysis using the total sample and an analysis including a longitudinal subsample.Results: The longitudinal analysis on mothers who gave birth in both pre- and post-measure periods showed that mothers exposed to the Programme had on average 6% (95% CI 3–9%) more full-term pregnancies and 2% (95% CI 0.03-3%) more babies with a birth weight ≥ 2500 g, compared to mothers who had care-as-usual. Savings were incurred in terms of outpatient care costs for children of mothers in the Salut area ($826). The difference-in-difference analysis using the total sample did not result in any significant differences in health outcomes or cumulative resource use over time.Conclusions: The Salut Programme achieved health gains, as a health promotion early intervention for children and parents, in terms of more full-term pregnancies and more babies with a birth weight ≥ 2500 g, at reasonable cost, and may lead to lower usage of outpatient care. Other indicators point towards positive effects, but the small sample size may have led to underestimation of true differences.
|
|
