| 1. |
- Atroshi, Isam, et al.
(författare)
-
Carpal tunnel syndrome and keyboard use at work - A population-based study
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Arthritis and Rheumatism. - : Wiley. - 1529-0131 .- 0004-3591. ; 56:11, s. 3620-3625
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective. To investigate the relationship between carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and keyboard use at work in a general population. Methods. A health status questionnaire was mailed to 2,465 persons of working age (25-65 years) who were randomly selected from the general population of a representative region of Sweden. The questionnaire required the subjects to provide information about the presence and severity of pain, numbness and tingling in each body region, employment history, and work activities, including average time spent using a keyboard during a usual working day. Those reporting recurrent hand numbness or tingling in the median nerve distribution were asked to undergo a physical examination and nerve conduction testing. The prevalence of CTS, defined as symptoms plus abnormal results on nerve conduction tests, was compared between groups of subjects that differed in their intensity of keyboard use, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and smoking status. Results. Eighty-two percent responded to the questionnaire, and 80% of all symptomatic persons attended the examinations. Persons who had reported intensive keyboard use on the questionnaire were significantly less likely to be diagnosed as having CTS than were those who had reported little keyboard use, with a prevalence that increased from 2.6% in the highest keyboard use group (>= 4 hours/day), to 2.9% in the moderate use group (1 to <4 hours/day), 4.9% in the low use group (<1 hour/day), and 5.2% in the no keyboard use at work group (P for trend = 0.032). Using >= 1 hour/day to designate high keyboard use and <1 hour/ day to designate low keyboard use, the prevalence ratio of CTS in the groups with high to low keyboard use was 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.32, 0.96). Conclusion. Intensive keyboard use appears to be associated with a lower risk of CTS.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Atroshi, Isam, et al.
(författare)
-
Open compared with 2-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
- 2009
-
Ingår i: The Journal of Hand Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1531-6564 .- 0363-5023. ; 34:2, s. 266-272
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to extend the previously reported short-term randomized trial of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) to compare outcomes 5 years after surgery. METHODS: In a single-center randomized controlled trial, 128 patients (25 to 60 years) with clinically diagnosed and electrophysiologically confirmed idiopathic CTS were randomized immediately before surgery to open or 2-portal endoscopic release. The outcome measures included the validated CTS questionnaire's symptom severity and functional status scales (scored from 1 to 5) completed at baseline and 1 year postoperatively. At the extended follow-up of the trial 5 years after surgery, 2 patients had died and the other 126 participants (63 patients in each group) completed the CTS questionnaire. RESULTS: At the 5-year follow-up no difference between the groups was found in the CTS symptom severity score. The mean (SD) score in the open group was 1.42 (0.7) and in the endoscopic group was 1.45 (0.7), and the mean difference in score change from baseline was 0.03 (95% confidence interval, -0.21 to 0.27). Between 1 year and 5 years postoperatively, the CTS symptom severity score had deteriorated by at least 0.4 point in 9 patients in the open group and in 10 patients in the endoscopic group. The mean (SD) CTS functional status score was 1.29 (0.5) in the open group and 1.30 (0.5) in the endoscopic group. At 5 years, 11 patients in the open group and 10 patients in the endoscopic group reported persistent pain in the scar or proximal palm. Three patients in each group had repeat surgery on the operated hand because of persistent or recurrent symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The improvements in symptoms of CTS and hand-related disability 5 years after open and 2-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release were equivalent. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic I.
|
|
| 4. |
- Atroshi, Isam, et al.
(författare)
-
Outcomes of endoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome among employed patients: randomised controlled trial.
- 2006
-
Ingår i: BMJ. - 0959-8138. ; 332(7556):1473, s. 1473-1476
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives To compare endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release surgery among employed patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Design and setting Randomised controlled trial at a single orthopaedic department. Participants 128 employed patients aged 25-60 years with clinically diagnosed and electrophysiologically confirmed idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was severity of postoperative pain in the scar or proximal palm and the degree to which pain or tenderness limits activities, each rated on a 4 point scale, transformed into a combined score of 0 (none) to 100 (severe pain or tenderness causing severe activity limitation). The secondary outcomes were length of postoperative work absence, severity of symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome and functional status scores, SF-12 quality of life score, and hand sensation and strength (blinded examiner); follow-up at three and six weeks and three and 12 months. Results 63 patients were allocated to endoscopic surgery and 65 patients to open surgery, with no withdrawals or dropouts. Pain hi the scar or proximal palm was less prevalent or severe after endoscopic surgery than after open surgery but die differences were generally small. At three months, pain in the scar or palm was reported by 33 patients (52%) in the endoscopic group and 53 patients (82%) in the open group (number needed to treat 3.4,95% confidence interval 2.3 to 7.7) and the mean score difference for severity of pain in scar or palm and limitation of activity was 13.3 (5.3 to 21.3). No differences between the groups were found in the other outcomes. The median length of work absence after surgery was 28 days in both groups. Quality of life measures improved substantially. Conclusions In carpal tunnel syndrome, endoscopic surgery was associated with less postoperative pain than open surgery, but the small size of the benefit and similarity in other outcomes make its cost effectiveness uncertain.
|
|
| 5. |
- Atroshi, Isam, et al.
(författare)
-
Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population
- 1999
-
Ingår i: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. - : American Medical Association (AMA). - 1538-3598. ; 282:2, s. 153-158
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- CONTEXT: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a cause of pain, numbness, and tingling in the hands and is an important cause of work disability. Although high prevalence rates of CTS in certain occupations have been reported, little is known about its prevalence in the general population. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of CTS in a general population. DESIGN: General health mail survey sent in February 1997, inquiring about symptoms of pain, numbness, and tingling in any part of the body, followed 2 months later by clinical examination and nerve conduction testing of responders reporting symptoms in the median nerve distribution in the hands, as well as of a sample of those not reporting these symptoms (controls). SETTING: A region in southern Sweden with a population of 170000. PARTICIPANTS: A sex- and age-stratified sample of 3000 subjects (age range, 25-74 years) was randomly selected from the general population register and sent the survey, with a response rate of 83% (n = 2466; 46% men). Of the symptomatic responders, 81% underwent clinical examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Population prevalence rates, calculated as the number of symptomatic responders diagnosed on examination as having clinically certain CTS and/or electrophysiological median neuropathy divided by the total number of responders. RESULTS: Of the 2466 responders, 354 reported pain, numbness, and/or tingling in the median nerve distribution in the hands (prevalence, 14.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.0%-15.8%). On clinical examination, 94 symptomatic subjects were diagnosed as having clinically certain CTS (prevalence, 3.8%; 95% CI, 3.1%-4.6%). Nerve conduction testing showed median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel in 120 symptomatic subjects (prevalence, 4.9%; 95% CI, 4.1%-5.8%). Sixty-six symptomatic subjects had clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed CTS (prevalence, 2.7%; 95% CI, 2.1%-3.4%). Of 125 control subjects clinically examined, electrophysiological median neuropathy was found in 23 (18.4%; 95% CI, 12.0%-26.3%). CONCLUSION: Symptoms of pain, numbness, and tingling in the hands are common in the general population. Based on our data, 1 in 5 symptomatic subjects would be expected to have CTS based on clinical examination and electrophysiologic testing.
|
|
| 6. |
- Atroshi, Isam, et al.
(författare)
-
Prevalensen för kliniskt säkerställt karpaltunnelsyndrom 4 procent
- 2000
-
Ingår i: Läkartidningen. - 0023-7205. ; 97:14, s. 1668-1670
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article summarizes the results of a large-scale population-based study conducted to determine the prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in the Swedish general population. The study utilized a health questionnaires as well as clinical and electrophysiological examinations. Population prevalence rates of carpal tunnel syndrome, based on clinical diagnosis and electrophysiological criteria, were calculated. Obesity and specific work-related hand activities were shown to be risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome.
|
|
