| 1. |
- Angerås, Oskar, 1976, et al.
(författare)
-
Impact of Thrombus Aspiration on Mortality, Stent Thrombosis, and Stroke in Patients with ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of the American Heart Association. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 2047-9980. ; 7:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background-Thrombus aspiration is still being used in a substantial number of patients despite 2 large randomized clinical trials showing no favorable effect of routine thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STsegment- elevation myocardial infarction. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the impact of thrombus aspiration on mortality, stent thrombosis, and stroke using all available data from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). Methods and Results--We identified 42 829 consecutive patients registered in SCAAR between January 2005 and September 2014 who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Thrombus aspiration was used in 25% of the procedures. We used instrumental variable analysis with administrative healthcare region as the treatmentpreference instrumental variable to evaluate the effect of thrombus aspiration on mortality, stent thrombosis, and stroke. Thrombus aspiration was not associated with mortality at 30 days (risk reduction: -1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] , -5.4 to 3.0; P=0.57) and 1 year (risk reduction: -2.4; 95% CI, -7.6 to 3.0; P=0.37). Thrombus aspiration was associated with a lower risk of stent thrombosis both at 30 days (risk reduction: -2.7; 95% CI, -4.1 to -1.4; P < 0.001) and 1 year (risk reduction: -3.5; 95% CI, -5.3 to -1.7; P < 0.001). In-hospital stroke and neurologic complications did not differ between groups (risk reduction: 0.1; 95% CI, -0.8 to 1.1; P=0.76). Conclusions--Mortality was not different between the groups. Thrombus aspiration was associated with decreased risk of stent thrombosis. Our study provides important evidence for the external validity of previous randomized studies regarding mortality.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Bergström, Göran, 1964, et al.
(författare)
-
Low socioeconomic status of a patient's residential area is associated with worse prognosis after acute myocardial infarction in Sweden.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: International journal of cardiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1874-1754 .- 0167-5273. ; 182, s. 141-147
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Previous studies have established a relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and survival in coronary heart disease. Acute cardiac care in Sweden is considered to be excellent and independent of SES. We studied the influence of area-level socioeconomic status on mortality after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between 1995 and 2013 in the Gothenburg metropolitan area, which has little over 800,000 inhabitants and includes three city hospitals.
|
|
| 4. |
- Haraldsson, Inger, et al.
(författare)
-
PROspective evaluation of coronary FLOW reserve and molecular biomarkers in patients with established coronary artery disease the PROFLOW-trial: cross-sectional evaluation of coronary flow reserve
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Vascular Health and Risk Management. - 1176-6344. ; 15, s. 375-384
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Survivors of myocardial infarction (MI) are at high risk of new major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is a strong and independent predictor of MACE. Understanding the prevalence of impaired CFR in this patient group and identifying risk markers for impaired CFR are important steps in the development of personalized and targeted treatment for high-risk individuals with prior MI. Methods: PROFLOW is a prospective, exploratory, cross-sectional open study. We used information from the SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry) to identify high-risk patients with a history of type-1 MI. We measured CFR non-invasively in a left anterior descending artery (LAD) using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Coronary flow velocity was measured at rest and at maximal flow after induction of hyperemia by intravenous infusion of adenosine (140 mu g/kg/min). Independent predictors of CFR were assessed with multiple linear regression. Results: We included 619 patients. The median age was 69 (IQR 65-73), and 114 (18.4%) were women. Almost one-half of the patients, 285 (46.0%) had the multi-vessel disease, and 147 (23.7%) were incompletely revascularized. The majority were on optimal standard treatment eg ASA (93.1%), statins (90.0%), ACEI/ARB (82.6%) and beta-blockers (80.8%). The majority, 547 (88.4%) had no angina pectoris, and 572 (92.2%) were in NYHA class I. Evaluation of CFR was possible in 611 (98.7%) patients. Mean CFR was 2.74 (+/- 0.79 (mean +/- SD)). A substantial number of patients (39.7%) had CFR <= 2.5. In a multiple linear regression model age, dyslipidemia, smoking, hypertension, body mass index, incomplete revascularization, and treatment with angiotensin receptor blockers were independent predictors of CFR. Conclusion: In this high-risk group of patients with prior MI, the prevalence of impaired CFR was high. Further risk stratification with CFR in addition to traditional cardiovascular risk factors may improve predictive accuracy for future MACE in this patient population.
|
|
| 5. |
- Redfors, Björn, et al.
(författare)
-
Prognosis is similar for patients who undergo primary PCI during regular-hours and off-hours: A report from SCAAR.
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. - : Wiley. - 1522-726X. ; 91:7, s. 1240-1249
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Timely percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves prognosis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, recent reports indicate that patients with STEMI who present during non-regular working hours (off-hours) have a worse prognosis. The aim of this study was to compare outcome between patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI during off-hours and regular hours.We retrieved data from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) for all patients who underwent primary PCI in Region Västra Götaland due to STEMI between January 2004 and May 2013. We modeled unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional-hazards regression and logistic regression models for the outcomes death, cardiogenic shock, stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis. A propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional-hazards model, which adjusted for traditional cardiovascular risk factors was predefined as the primary statistical model. Death at any time during the study period was pre-specified as primary end-point.During the study period 4.611 (65%) patients underwent primary PCI due to STEMI during off-hours and 2,525 (35%) during regular hours. The risk of dying was similar among the groups for the primary endpoint death at any time during the study period (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.89-1.12, P = 0.991) and for secondary end-point death within 30 days (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.85-1.25, P = 0.735). The risks of developing cardiogenic shock, stent thrombosis, or in-stent restenosis were similar between the groups.In our region, short- and long-term prognosis for patients with STEMI who undergo primary PCI is similar for patients presenting during off-hours and regular hours.
|
|
| 6. |
- Völz, Sebastian, 1980, et al.
(författare)
-
Ticagrelor is Not Superior to Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing PCI: A Report from Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of the American Heart Association. - 2047-9980. ; 9:14
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Ticagrelor reduces ischaemic end points in acute coronary syndromes. However, outcomes of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in real-world patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain unclear. We sought to examine whether treatment with ticagrelor is superior to clopidogrel in unselected patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with PCI. Methods and Results We used data from SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry) for PCI performed in Västra Götaland County, Sweden. The database contains information about all PCI performed at 5 hospitals (∼20% of all data in SCAAR). All procedures between January 2005 and January 2015 for unstable angina/non‒ST-segment‒elevation myocardial infarction and ST-segment‒elevation myocardial infarction were included. We used instrumental variable 2-stage least squares regression to adjust for confounders. The primary combined end point was mortality or stent thrombosis at 30 days, secondary end points were mortality at 30 days and 1-year, stent thrombosis at 30 days, in-hospital bleeding, in-hospital neurologic complications and long-term mortality. A total of 15 097 patients were included in the study of which 2929 (19.4%) were treated with ticagrelor. Treatment with ticagrelor was not associated with a lower risk for the primary end point (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.20; 95% CI, 0.87-1.61; P=0.250). Estimated risk of death at 30 days (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.88-1.64; P=0.287) and at 1-year (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.86-1.64; P=0.556) was not different between the groups. The risk of in-hospital bleeding was higher with ticagrelor (aOR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.53-5.44; P=0.001). Conclusions In this observational study, treatment with ticagrelor was not superior to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with PCI.
|
|
