| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Jönsson, Sten, 1940, et al.
(författare)
-
Design for redesign: Deliberating strategic action in an industrial net
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Third International Workshop on Organization Design, Centre for Organizational Renewal and Evolution (CORE), Aarhus School of Business, University of Arhus, 18-20 maj 2008, Aarhus, Danmark.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- In 2007 a series of press-releases from a component producer in an industrial network announces, that a company was elected ‘preferred/best’ partner by a major customer. A Centre-of-Excellence status is the business objective of that company, a member of a global industrial network. The aim of this article is to explicate how a management team loads a prospect, a scenario plan, with values to sustain it as a guiding principle over a period of five years. The main question is ontological. In a constructivist perspective, defining a prospect seems to be a flexible way to handle the unknown future, and it also means that a joint meaning of the prospect is not defined by the presenter or anyone of the members of the meeting. A window of opportunity is identified during a management team meeting’s discussion but to capture that opportunity, a business competitor has to realise the benefit of the management team’s proposal. The discussion ends by approval of the entire group. The half hour meeting occurred five years ago, was video recorded, observed and transcribed. The analysis of the discussion elucidates acts, negotiations and responses to the suggested prospect as well as various strategies to thwart possible actions of business competitors in the net-work. The management team’s actions taken to design for a redesign of the prospect during the five year period is not known.
|
|
| 5. |
- Kokk, Gary, 1963, et al.
(författare)
-
On the discursive contruction of action
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Presenterad vid 18th Scandianvian Academy of Management, 18-20 Augusti 2005, Aarhus, Danmark.. - Aarhus, Danmark.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Rovio-Johansson, Airi, 1939
(författare)
-
Changing teaching, changing teachers: learning through contrast, generalization and fusion
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Paper presented at the EARLI Conference 12-16 August 2019 at Aachen University, Germany..
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- In all its adaptations, Lesson Study emphasises the use of evidence to guide teachers’ collaborative reflection on what works in the classroom. Phenomenography and variation theory provide us with the tools to explore the experience of teacher learning through participation in Lesson Study. From an analysis of reports providing evidence of the experience of teacher learning voiced by teachers participating in the Learning Study (LS) adaptation of Lesson Study, we sought to identify the object of learning and the path of learning - separation, contrast, generalization, fusion (Marton, 2015) - that led to change in the teachers’ experience of teaching. We were interested also in the experience of the facilitator or coach, and in the part, they play in the teacher group's pursuit of that path. Variation theory posits that, if learning has occurred, it has resulted from an experience of variation. Our question: ‘What is that experience of variation that leads to teacher learning through LS?’ In summary, we are interested to identify necessary conditions of teacher learning through participation in LS. From this study, we are able to argue that LS should have a central role in initial and in-service teacher education programmes in higher education.
|
|
