| 1. |
- Lindner, Philip, et al.
(författare)
-
Differential impact of performance and interaction related types of social anxiety symptoms on different quality of life domains
- 2016
-
Ingår i: EABCT 2016 Abstract Book. ; , s. 748-748
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is a common disorder associated with impaired quality of life (QoL), that indexes anxious distress and avoidance related to social situations. The DSM-5 features a specifier to delineate those with only performance-related social anxiety, yet little is known whether performance- and interaction-related anxieties have a differential impact on total QoL and on different QoL domains. To investigate this, we pooled screening data from eight intervention studies for SAD (n = 2017). Total sample mean age was 35.28 (SD = 12.26) and 69% were female. SAD symptoms were measured using the self-rated Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale with items classified as measuring either performance or interaction anxiety. QoL, both total and across four domains, was measured using the Quality of Life Inventory. Data was analyzed using multiple regression models featuring the two anxiety scores as predictors, and by simulating the Performance-only specifier through 2˙2 median-split subgrouping and standard ANOVAs. Both interaction and performance anxieties were independently associated with lower QoL in general and across domains. Interaction anxiety had a larger negative impact on Personal Growth- and Achievement-related QoL than performance anxiety. The High-Performance/Low-Interaction-group rated higher Achievement-related QoL compared to the Low-Performance/High-Interaction-group (p = .012), yet groups were matched on total QoL and on other domains. Other group differences were in the expected direction.QoL impairments in SAD is primarily driven by number of feared social situations, and only secondarily by types of fear social situations, with interaction anxiety having a larger, negative impact on some QoL domains.
|
|
| 2. |
- Rozental, Alexander, et al.
(författare)
-
Measuring adverse and unwanted events in psychotherapy
- 2018
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Psychotherapy offers many benefits, but research also indicate that negative effects sometimes occur. The Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ) was therefore developed to help researchers and clinicians determine the occurrence and characteristics of such incidents. Method: The NEQ was evaluated in two studies, using data from both clinical trials and a survey distributed among individuals in the general population (Ns 653 and 564). Results: The results from an exploratory factor analysis suggest that six factors could be relevant to retain: symptoms, quality, dependency, stigma, hopelessness, and failure, with poor treatment quality and therapeutic relationship having the highest self-rated negative effects. Further, the results from a Rasch analysis, a modern test theory application, suggest that the self-report measure exhibits fairness in testing across sociodemographics and that it is suitable for monitoring items with regard to their frequencies or levels of impact. Overall, 18.8% of the patients experienced more stress, 12.6% reported the resurfacing of unpleasant memories, and 12.2% were more anxious during treatment, implying that adverse and unwanted events are not uncommon in psychotherapy and may have to be monitored. Conclusion: The NEQ could be a useful self-report measure to investigate negative effects in both research and clinical practice.
|
|
| 3. |
- Rozental, Alexander, et al.
(författare)
-
The Negative Effects Questionnaire : Psychometric Properties of an Instrument for Assessing Negative Effects in Psychological Treatments
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of Behavioural & Cognitive Therapies. - Tübingen : dgvt-Verlag. - 9783871598517 ; 47:5, s. 559-572
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Psychological treatments provide many benefits for patients with psychiatric disorders, but research also suggest that negative effects might occur from the interventions involved. The Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ) has previously been developed as a way of determining the occurrence and characteristics of such incidents, consisting of 32 items and six factors. However, the NEQ has yet to be examined using modern test theory, which could help to improve the understanding of how well the instrument works psychometrically. Aims: The current study investigated the reliability and validity of the NEQ from both a person and item perspective, establishing goodness-of-fit, item bias, and scale precision. Method: The NEQ was distributed to 564 patients in five clinical trials at post-treatment. Data was analyzed using Rasch analysis, i.e., a modern test theory application. Results: 1) the NEQ exhibits fairness in testing across sociodemographics, 2) shows comparable validity for a final and condensed scale of 20 instead of 32 items, 3) uses a rating scale that advances monotonically in steps of 0-4, and 4) is suitable for monitoring negative effects on an item-level. Conclusion: The NEQ is proposed as a useful instrument for investigating negative effects in psychological treatments, and its newer shorter format could facilitate its use in clinical and research settings. However, further research is needed to explore the relationship between negative effects and treatment outcome, as well as to test it in more diverse patient populations
|
|
