| 1. |
- Schön, Ulla-Karin, 1970-
(författare)
-
Kvinnors och mäns återhämtning från psykisk ohälsa
- 2009
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The overall aim with this thesis is to describe and analyze women’s and men’s recovery processes. More specifically, the aim is to determine what women and men with experience of mental illness describe as contributing to the personal recovery process. The point of departure for the studies was 30 in-depth interviews conducted with 15 men and 15 women. The selection of interview subjects was limited to individuals who had been treated in 24-hour psychiatric care and diagnosed as having schizophrenia, psychosis, a personality disorder, or a bipolar disorder. Four studies have been carried. Study 1 was a baseline article that examined what people in recovery from mental illness outline as facilitating factors to their recovery. The results that emerged from that study indicated areas for further analysis to condense the understanding of the recovery process. In study 2 the similarities and the differences in recovery described by women and men were examined. In Study 3 women’s and men’s meaning-making with reference to severe mental illness facilitate the recovery process were studied. The forth study explored how peer-support contribute to women’s and men’s recovery from mental illness. The results emphasize recovery from mental illness as a social process in which relationships play a key role in creating new identities beside the mental illness. For a majority of the participants meeting peers facilitated the recovery process. The participants described how peer support meant an end to isolation and became an arena for identification, connection, and being important to others. Throughout these recovery processes the impact of gender has been emphasized. The results from this thesis provide new insight into gender as an important factor in understanding the recovery processes. The results from the four studies emphasize the mental patient, the psychiatric interventions and the individual recovery strategies as being influenced by gender constructions.
|
|
| 2. |
- Andersson, Peter, 1980-, et al.
(författare)
-
Exploring stakeholder perspectives to facilitate the implementation of shared decision-making in coordinated individual care planning : [Utforskande av stakeholderperspektiv för att stödja implementeringen av delat beslutsfattande i samordnad individuell vårdplanering]
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Social Work. - : Routledge. - 1369-1457 .- 1468-2664.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article explores conditions for implementing shared decision-making (SDM) in coordinated individual care planning (CIP) with individuals with complex mental health needs. SDM in CIP are described as central, although such user centred collaboration still remains to be realised. Research underlines the need for a changed way of working, where user expertise is valued and a balance of power is promoted. The aim of the present study is to investigate the conditions for implementing SDM in connection with CIP for and with people with mental illness. To better understand the context and conditions that can promote such an implementation, altogether 15 participants were interviewed in three regions in Sweden within the scope of a stakeholder analysis. Both hindering and supporting factors were identified with respect to an implementation process, such as staff turnover, differences in work culture and committed leadership. Further focus should be directed specifically towards professionals working more closely with CIP and towards in-depth analysis of the construct of culture in terms of implementation processes.
|
|
| 3. |
- Bromark, Kristina, 1973-, et al.
(författare)
-
Practitioners exploring intertwined challenges and possible solutions for user participation in social services
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Nordic Social Work Research. - 2156-857X .- 2156-8588. ; , s. 283-295
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Despite a strong emphasis on user participation in social services, scientific knowledge on how to achieve these goals is limited. The aim of this study is to explore what social work practitioners identify as challenging in implementing user participation and what solutions they propose to be necessary to meet these challenges. Future workshops were applied, combining data from brainstorming processes and from the participants’ analytical work, identifying current obstacles and co-creating solutions. The workshops took place at the Personal Social Services section in a suburban area outside a large city in Sweden with 95 participants. The findings are discussed in relation to a model of participation, where creating openings, opportunities, and obligations are essential. The participants highlighted the need to strengthen commitment to user participation, increased access to knowledge and methods that enhance user participation, and support from management, with increased resources to ensure continuous development and maintenance. Practitioners must be able to engage in user participation, and actions need to be taken at all organizational levels. To overcome a complex and intertwined set of challenges, an intertwined set of solutions is required.
|
|
| 4. |
- Bromark, Kristina, 1973-
(författare)
-
The user as a key actor in user participation : Exploring knowledge production in personal social services with a participatory approach
- 2024
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The concept of user participation in social work is frequently debated. In Sweden, users are supposed to be active and involved in matters concerning them, a stance which is regulated in policy and law. The involvement of users in practice can be considered a form of knowledge production that can strengthen and develop users as well as the organizations. In practice, however, research shows that actual engagement, education or activation of users is difficult to attain and can be understood as a devaluation of user knowledge. The aim of this dissertation is to increase knowledge of how to understand and enhance the conditions for user participation in personal social services. To study this question, the dissertation focuses especially on young people’s participation in the context of out-of-home care. To explore user participation in personal social services, a participatory approach was applied. Data was gathered with young people and staff using participatory techniques as well as qualitative interviews. To explore challenges and possibilities with user participation, a future workshop was held with staff in personal social services (study I). This was followed by a co-design process in which staff, young people, and researchers collaborated on a support tool (study II), later to be implemented in practice (study III). The implementation process was explored by interviewing both staff and managers as well as a user representative (from a youth council). The co-design and implementation processes are problematized and discussed in the dissertation from a researcher’s perspective (study IV). The theoretical framework for understanding how users can be devalued as knowers is epistemic injustice. The assumption is that the role of a knower can shift, depending on social power and the structures in a context. The findings in this dissertation show that user participation is contingent on the distribution of power and responsibility and on perceptions of knowers and knowledge in practice. Although the general attitude towards user participation is positive, a reluctance in practice is revealed. It appears to be a challenge for staff to acknowledge the expertise of users, despite the fact that the users’ have the capacity and are willing to contribute with their knowledge. Work with user participation is identified as a team effort that requires actions at all levels of the organization as well as increased resources, leadership and a coherent understanding and agreement of the concept. A participatory approach to knowledge production with users is identified as a possible way to enhance epistemic justice and the inclusion of all relevant actors in activities and processes. The dimensions important to user participation can be acknowledged. For the dynamics to be maintained in a wider sense, however, an organizational infrastructure, with routines and methods, is necessary. To sustain epistemic justice in the implementation of user participation, a participatory culture with a solid and coherent understanding of user participation in practice is encouraged. A realization of user participation in practice requires a critical exploration of power and positions, systematic changes to infrastructure and transparency about roles and responsibility.
|
|
| 5. |
- Dahlqvist Jönsson, Patrik, 1974-, et al.
(författare)
-
Service users' experiences of participation in decision making in mental health services
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. - Chichester : Wiley-Blackwell. - 1351-0126 .- 1365-2850. ; 22:9, s. 688-697
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Service user participation in decision making is considered an essential component of recovery-oriented mental health services. Despite the potential of shared decision making to impact service users knowledge and positively influence their experience of decisional conflict, there is a lack of qualitative research on how participation in decision making is promoted from the perspective of psychiatric service users. In order to develop concrete methods that facilitate shared decision making, there is a need for increased knowledge regarding the users' own perspective. The aim of this study was to explore users' experiences of participation in decisions in mental health services in Sweden, and the kinds of support that may promote participation. Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) was utilized to analyse group and individual interviews with 20 users with experience of serious mental illness. The core category that emerged in the analysis described a 'struggle to be perceived as a competent and equal person' while three related categories including being the underdog, being controlled and being omitted described the difficulties of participating in decisions. The data analysis resulted in a model that describes internal and external conditions that influence the promotion of participation in decision making. The findings offer new insights from a user perspective and these can be utilized to develop and investigate concrete methods in order to promote user's participation in decisions.
|
|
| 6. |
- Erlandsson, Sara, 1979-, et al.
(författare)
-
Perceptions of participation: how nursing home staff and managers perceive and strive for participation of older residents : [Brukardelaktighet på äldreboenden – vad vill personal och chefer uppnå?]
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Social Work. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1369-1457 .- 1468-2664. ; 26:5, s. 815-827
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- User participation is increasingly emphasised in policies guiding social services. However, translating policy into practice is fraught with difficulties. The staff’s approaches to user participation are crucial for the users’ opportunities to participate in decision-making, particularly for users with extensive care needs and reduced autonomy. The aim of this article is to explore how nursing home staff and managers perceive the participation of older residents and what the implications are for residents’ involvement in decision-making in everyday life. Interviews and future workshops were carried out with staff and managers in two Swedish nursing homes. The analysis identified differing and partly conflicting perceptions of user participation that have different implications for the residents’ opportunities to be involved in decisions. The staff’s and managers’ approaches to participation ranged from encouraging independent decision-making to excluding the residents from decisions, depending on the situation and the assessment of residents’ abilities. In addition, the analyses showed that perceptions of participation are intertwined with perceptions of good care and with the staff’s and managers’ understandings of their mission and responsibilities. The findings indicate that increasing user participation in nursing homes requires organisational policies that clarify what user participation is and strategies for implementation in daily practice.
|
|
| 7. |
- Grim, Katarina, et al.
(författare)
-
Development- and usability testing of a web-based decision support for users and health professionals in psychiatric services
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Psychiatric rehabilitation journal. - Washington, DC : American Psychological Association (APA). - 1095-158X .- 1559-3126. ; 40:3, s. 293-302
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: Shared decision making (SMD) related to treatment and rehabilitation is considered a central component in recovery-oriented practice. Although decision aids are regarded as an essential component for successfully implementing SDM, these aids are often lacking within psychiatric services. The aim of this study was to use a participatory design to facilitate the development of a user-generated, web-based decision aid for individuals receiving psychiatric services. The results of this effort as well as the lessons learned during the development and usability processes are reported. Method: The participatory design included 4 iterative cycles of development. Various qualitative methods for data collection were used with potential end users participating as informants in focus group and individual interviews and as usability and pilot testers. Results: Interviewing and testing identified usability problems that then led to refinements and making the subsequent prototypes increasingly user-friendly and relevant. In each phase of the process, feedback from potential end-users provided guidance in developing the formation of the web-based decision aid that strengthens the position of users by integrating access to information regarding alternative supports, interactivity between staff and users, and user preferences as a continual focus in the tool. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: This web-based decision aid has the potential to strengthen service users’ experience of self-efficacy and control as well as provide staff access to user knowledge and preferences. Studies employing participatory models focusing on usability have potential to significantly contribute to the development and implementation of tools that reflect user perspectives.
|
|
| 8. |
- Grim, Katarina, et al.
(författare)
-
Exploring psychiatric users’ decisional and information needs in Shared Decision Making in the light of Elwyn´s three-step model for Clinical practice
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Closing the gap between research and policy in mental health. - Málaga : ENMESH. - 9788460827818 ; , s. 118-119
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Using medication and participating in psychosocial interventions are active processes that often involve complex decision-making. Shared decision making, SDM, provides a model for user and practitioner to cooperatively assess a treatment’s advantages and disadvantages. Decision aid tools adapted to the needs of users have the potential to restructure how people with mental illness and staff work together to arrive at shared decisions about the next steps in treatment or support.Aims: The objective of this study is to investigate decisional and information needs among users with mental illness as a pre-requisite for the design and development of a decision aid aimed at supporting user participation in SDM.Methods: Needs and preferences regarding information transfer in SDM were explored through semi-structured focus group interviews. Participants were adults with psychiatric diagnoses and experience of psychiatric services or close relatives to someone with a psychiatric illness.Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the data. The transcriptions were initially analyzed in accordance with a conventional, inductive approach. A directed content analysis was then utilized, with Elwyn’s three step model for SDM as a theoretical framework from which to further operationalize the categories rendered in the first step of analysis.Results: The majority of the findings were easily integrated within Elwyn ́s categories. However, some elements which emerged in the data and which are worth noting were not encompassed within Elwyn’s model, such as the wish for information prior to the meeting regarding the time frame and agenda. The importance of heeding the prior knowledge of the user as valuable for the decision process and not solely checking it in order to correct possible misinformation was frequently expressed, as was the value of follow-ups.Conclusions: Even though Elwyn’s model is constructed as a pedagogic tool to be used by staff, while our focus is directed towards creating a tool for users, the application of the model upon our data was indeed helpful in rendering clearly defined and distinguishable codes from our categories. We therefore consider it to be a suitable model to continue to build upon in the development of a decision aid.
|
|
| 9. |
- Grim, Katarina, 1971-
(författare)
-
Legitimizing the knowledge of mental health service users in shared decision making : Promoting participation through a web-based decision support tool
- 2019
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Aim: The overall aim of this thesis was to explore the manner in which user knowledge and user perspectives can be included and supported in shared decision making (SDM) in mental health services.The thesis consists of four studies. Study I explored what needs service users identify to participate in deliberative processes and decision making in their care. Study II examined how a decision support tool (DST) for SDM can be designed to enhance service users’ ability to have active and meaningful roles in SDM. Study III investigated barriers and facilitators associated with the implementation of a web-based DST designed to provide a concrete structure to support SDM. In study IV, a theoretical analysis was performed to elucidate the barriers associated with user knowledge being expressed and legitimized in decision-making processes.Methods: A key feature of the project involved a process of exploring decisional and informational needs and of developing, testing and implementing a DST for SDM. Qualitative data have been collected through focus group and individual interviews with service users and service providers, usability testing with service users and checklists.Findings: The findings show a number of characteristics specific to the mental health service context that need to be considered when developing support for SDM. Decisions were often complex and found to encompass a number of life domains. Issues related to social context and individual recovery highlighted the necessity to include the knowledge perspectives of service users throughout decision processes. In response, phases for preparation and follow-up was emphasized in the DST. The results indicate that supportive structures are required for service users to express their knowledge perspectives and for providers to include them in their decision-making. Moreover, existing barriers related to organizational structures and to power differentials need to be addressed. Conclusions and implications: A DST specifically designed for the mental health context, that methodically invites service users to participate in each phase of the decision-making process might function as a guiding structure to validate service users as knowledgeable agents.
|
|
| 10. |
- Grim, Katarina, 1971-, et al.
(författare)
-
Legitimizing user knowledge in mental health services : Epistemic (in)justice and barriers to knowledge integration
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Frontiers in Psychiatry. - Lausanne : Frontiers Media S.A.. - 1664-0640. ; 13
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Including the voices and knowledge of service users is essential for developing recovery-oriented and evidence-based mental health services. Recent studies have however, suggested that challenges remain to the legitimization of user knowledge in practice. To further explore such challenges, a co-production study was conducted by a team of researchers and representatives from user organizations in Sweden. The aim of the study was to explore the barriers and facilitators to the legitimacy of user knowledge, as a central factor in sustainably implementing user influence in mental health practice. A series of workshops, with representatives of mental health services and user organizations were conducted by the research team to explore these issues. The analysis built on the theoretical framework of epistemic injustice, and the underlying aspects, testimonial, hermeneutic and participation-based injustice, were utilized as a framework for a deductive analysis. Results suggest that this is a useful model for exploring the complex dynamics related to the legitimacy of user knowledge in mental health systems. The analysis suggests that the legitimacy of user knowledge is related to the representativeness of the knowledge base, the systematic formulation of this knowledge inapplicable methods, access to resources and positions within the mental health system and participation in the process of integrating this knowledge-base in mental health contexts. Legitimizing user knowledge in practice additionally challenges mental health systems to support readiness for change in working environments and to address the power and role issues that these changes involve. Copyright © 2022 Grim, Näslund, Allaskog, Andersson, Argentzell, Broström, Jenneteg, Jansson, Schön, Svedberg, Svensson, Wåhlstedt and Rosenberg.
|
|
