| 1. |
- Johnston, Nina, 1961-, et al.
(författare)
-
Are we using cardiovascular medications and coronary angiography appropriately in men and women with chest pain?
- 2011
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 32:11, s. 1331-1336
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims The main purpose of the present study was to analyse the contemporary use of cardiovascular medications and diagnostic coronary angiography in men and women with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Furthermore, we examined the association of outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, repeat coronary angiography, procedural complications) with angiographic findings.Methods All patients with stable chest pain (n = 12 200) referred for a first-time elective diagnostic coronary angiography during 2006-08 and registered in the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Register (SCAAR) were included. Significant CAD was defined as ≥50% luminal narrowing in any epicardial coronary artery.Results In the youngest age group (≤59 years), more women than men (78.8 vs. 42.3%, P< 0.001) had normal/non-significant CAD, whereas more men had either left-main or three-vessel disease (18.2 vs. 4.2%, P < 0.001). Event rates were similarly low for men and women with normal/non-significant CAD, except for a higher procedural complication rate in women. Prior to angiography, fewer women than men with high-risk features were prescribed aspirin (83 vs. 86.1%, P = 0.001).Conclusion In women, normal/non-significant CAD was highly prevalent, especially among younger women, and associated cardiovascular event rates were low. In men, findings of advanced disease were more common than in women, even younger men. Fewer high-risk women than men were initially prescribed aspirin. The observed sex differences suggest a need for improved identification of women appropriate for investigation with coronary angiography, earlier diagnostics in men, and heightened attention in the evidence-based use of aspirin in risk patients, especially women.
|
|
| 2. |
- Johnston, Nina, et al.
(författare)
-
Do clinical factors explain persistent sex disparities in the use of acute reperfusion therapy in STEMI in Sweden and Canada?
- 2013
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2048-8726 .- 2048-8734. ; 2:4, s. 350-358
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIMS:This study examined clinical factors associated with sex differences in the use of acute reperfusion therapy (fibrinolysis or primary percutaneous coronary intervention) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, and the interaction between sex and these factors in Sweden and Canada.METHODS:Patients with STEMI in Sweden (n=32,676 from the Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive Care Admissions) were compared with similar patients in Canada (n=3375 from the Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) for the period 2004-2008.RESULTS:Unadjusted vs. age-adjusted odds ratios (OR) for no reperfusion (women vs. men) were for Sweden 1.57 (95% CI 1.49-1.64) vs. 1.14 (95% CI 1.08-1.20), and for Canada 1.61 (95% CI 1.39-1.87) vs. OR 1.18 (95% CI 1.01-1.39). Sex differences persisted after multivariable adjustments (including prehospital delay, atypical symptoms, diabetes), factors for which no interaction with sex was found. Among women <60 years, adjusting for atypical symptoms in Canada and angiographic data in Sweden made the greatest contribution to explaining observed sex differences.CONCLUSIONS:In both countries, acute reperfusion therapy in STEMI was used less often in women than in men. Factors associated with these sex differences appear to differ between older and younger women. Targeted interventions are needed to optimize care for women with STEMI, as well as sex- and age-stratified reporting of quality indicators to assess their effectiveness.
|
|
| 3. |
- Johnston, Nina, et al.
(författare)
-
Effect of Gender on Patients With ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
- 2015
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Cardiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0002-9149 .- 1879-1913. ; 115:12, s. 1661-1666
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study was to compare the prognoses of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and those with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and the risk associated with gender for future cardiovascular events. The study population was selected from 95,849 patients who underwent coronary angiography for myocardial infarction from 2005 to 2010 and registered in the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). Outcome analyses, including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, stroke, and revascularization, were performed in 2,268 patients with STEMI and 10,904 with NSTEMI without obstructive CAD (<50% stenosis). Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals comparing women with men were calculated for events, adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors and age. Nonobstructive CAD was found in 7% of patients with STEMI (6% men, 10% women) and in 17% of those with NSTEMI (11% men, 28% women). During a median follow-up of 2.6 years, 8% of patients with STEMI and 5% of those with NSTEMI died. Gender-associated differences in risk were observed in patients with NSTEMI, with adjusted hazard ratios lower in women than men for mortality (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.73) and congestive heart failure (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.72). In the 2 groups, women underwent less revascularization. In conclusion, nonobstructive CAD was more common in patients with NSTEMI than those with STEMI, as well as in women compared with men. Long-term mortality in patients with nonobstructive CAD was higher after STEMI than NSTEMI. The gender differences in outcomes suggest gender differences in the underlying pathogenesis of myocardial infarction without obstructive CAD.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
