| 1. |
- Beilin, Ruth, et al.
(författare)
-
Analysing how drivers of agricultural land abandonment affect biodiversity and cultural landscapes using case studies from Scandinavia, Iberia and Oceania
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Land use policy. - : Elsevier BV. - 0264-8377 .- 1873-5754. ; 36, s. 60-72
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Agricultural land abandonment (ALA) is widespread in many countries of the global north. It impacts rural communities, traditional landscapes, biodiversity and ecosystem services. It is an opportunity for ecosystem restoration or new landscape functions. We explored ALA in study areas in Australia, Portugal and Sweden. In each, we assessed plant species diversity, historical trajectories of land cover change; and the socioeconomic past, present and future in interviews with farmers. The ALA data was integrated and analysed by identifying the drivers of change. The relative importance of each driver and its scale of action was estimated, both in the past (1950-2010) and in the future (2010-2030). ALA has transformed rural landscapes in the study areas of Portugal and Sweden. It is at a much earlier stage with potential to increase in the Australian case. We identified a set of driving forces, classified into pressures, frictions and attractors that clarify why ALA, noting its temporal and spatial scale, occurs differently in each study area. The effect of the drivers is related to social and historical contexts. Pressures and attractors encouraging agricultural abandonment are strongest in Portugal and Sweden. Generally more (institutionalized) frictions are in place in these European sites, intended to prevent further change, based on the benefits assumed for biodiversity and aesthetics. In Australia, the stimulation of driving forces to promote a well-managed abandonment of some cleared areas could be highly beneficial for biodiversity, minimally disruptive for current dairy farming operations and would bring opportunities for alternative types of rural development.
|
|
| 2. |
- Lindborg, Regina, et al.
(författare)
-
A landscape perspective on conservation of semi-natural grasslands.
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. - : Elsevier BV. - 0167-8809. ; 125:1-4, s. 213-222
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Current agri-environmental schemes and subsidies for conservation and restoration of semi-natural grasslands do not explicitly assess land use changes affecting whole landscapes, but have so far focused on single objects and small areas. In this paper, we discuss a landscape perspective versus a “single object” perspective when conserving semi-natural grassland in agricultural landscapes. The focus is on the values biodiversity, cultural heritage, a vital countryside, and effects on economy when land use changes. We conclude that when land use change in the landscape surrounding an object, important additional effects on the different values are found. For example, a countryside where animals graze former arable fields and where marginal habitats are managed will have a positive effect, not only on the biodiversity associated to semi-natural grasslands, but also for the image of a vital and dynamic landscape. An increased number of roads, on the other hand, may negatively affect cultural heritage and decrease biodiversity in grasslands, leading to negative effects on the value of common goods through isolation. Placing objects in a larger spatial context and combining several different aspects into a landscape perspective, will improve long-term preservation of values associated to semi-natural grasslands.
|
|
| 3. |
- Lindborg, Regina, et al.
(författare)
-
Investigating biodiversity trajectories using scenarios – Lessons from two contrasting agricultural landscapes
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Journal of Environmental Management. - : Elsevier BV. - 0301-4797 .- 1095-8630. ; 91:2, s. 499-508
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Agriculture is the major land use at a global scale. In addition to food production, multifunctionality of landscapes, including values and ecosystem services like biodiversity, recreation and culture, is now focus for management. This study explores how a scenario approach, involving different stakeholders, may help to improve landscape management for biodiversity conservation. Local farmers and executives at the County Administrative Board were invited to discuss rural development and conditions for farmland biodiversity in two Swedish landscapes. The potential biodiversity for three future land use scenarios for the two landscapes was discussed: nature conservation, outdoor recreation and energy production, and compared with current and historical landscapes in each region. Analyses of habitat areas, connectedness and landscape diversity suggested that the energy and recreation scenarios had a negative impact on farmland biodiversity, whereas the nature conservation scenario, the current and historically reconstructed landscapes had a higher potential for biodiversity. The farmers appreciated the nature conservation scenario, but also the energy production scenario and they highlighted the need of increased subsidies for management of biodiversity. The farmers in the high production area were less interested in nature quality per se. The executives had similar opinions as the farmers, but disagreed on the advantages with energy production, as this would be in conflict with the high biodiversity and recreational values. The local physical and socio-economical conditions differ between landscapes and potentially shaped the stakeholders emotional attachment to the local environment, their opinions and decisions on how to manage the land. We stress the importance of incorporating local knowledge, visions and regional prerequisites for different land uses in conservation, since site and landscape specific planning for biodiversity together with a flexible subsidy system are necessary to reach the conservation goals within EU.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Lindborg, Regina, et al.
(författare)
-
Offra inte Sveriges betesmarker
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Svenska Dagbladet. ; :18 februari 2019
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Ambitionen att minska köttkonsumtionen är lovvärd men riskerar att slå hårt mot den biologiska mångfalden och ekosystemtjänster. Om våra naturbetesmarker försvinner kan vi inte leva upp till FN:s internationella hållbarhetsmål och våra egna svenska miljömål som vi förbundit oss att jobba mot.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Stenseke, Marie, 1963, et al.
(författare)
-
System or arena? Conceptual concerns around the analysis of landscape dynamics.
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Resilience and the cultural landscape: Understanding and managing change in human shaped environments. Eds. T. Plieninger & C. Bieling. - Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. - 9781107020788 ; , s. 80-94
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- An important challenge in the quest for sustainable development is to understand and manage changes in the physical landscape. When including the material as well as the immaterial, features as well as processes, and when considering the unique constellations of these at different sites, strategies for sustainable development must by necessity reflect local variation. In this chapter we explore the appropriateness of applying the concept social-ecological systems when analysing landscape dynamics in delimited areas, and we test and discuss potential insights that could be gained from relating resilience thinking to a geographical landscape approach. First we will elaborate on the spatial dimension of the concept of social-ecological systems, departing from key publications prominent in resilience thinking. Second, we describe central aspects in research applying a spatial landscape approach, departing from concepts developed by Torsten Hägerstrand, and discuss the links between the different approaches and inherent concepts. A Swedish case, the rural landscape of Hållnäs, will here be used to clarify the theoretical reasoning. Finally, based on these links, we suggest a tentative conceptual model for framing and analysing landscape dynamics. The chapter should be read as an exercise in exploring conceptual concerns.
|
|
