| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Head, Lesley, et al.
(author)
-
Holding on and letting go: nature, temporality and environmental management
- 2016
-
In: Nature, temporality and environmental management : Scandinavian and Australian perspectives on peoples and landscapes / edited by Lesley Head, Katarina Saltzman, Gunhild Setten and Marie Stenseke.. - London and New York : Routledge. - 9781472464651 ; , s. 3-12
-
Book chapter (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Setten, Gunhild, et al.
(author)
-
"Conceptual battles” as landscape drivers
- 2009
-
In: Paper presenterat vid seminariet Reassessing Landscape drivers and the globalised agenda, 7 October 2009, Lund..
-
Conference paper (other academic/artistic)
|
|
| 5. |
- Setten, Gunhild, et al.
(author)
-
Ecosystem services and landscape management: three challenges and one plea
- 2012
-
In: International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management. - : Taylor & Francis. - 2151-3740 .- 2151-3732. ; 4:8, s. 305-312
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- This article identifies three interrelated challenges concerning the ecosystem services (ES) framework and the nature of landscape dynamics within the context of landscape management. These challenges are set within a problematic externalization of nature inherent in the ES framework. The first challenge concerns the lack of compatibility between the ES framework and the logics of landscapes. The second challenge addresses the complexity of ecosystems, unsubstitutable values, and intangible dimensions in economic valuation when applied to landscapes. The third challenge points at how the ES framework has problems in accounting for how and why sociocultural processes are crucial to environmental attitudes and behavior. We argue that the idea of landscape and its inherent landscape dynamics, a crosscutting dimension of these challenges, is a missed opportunity for the ES framework in order to take immeasurable and context-specific social and cultural processes more seriously and consequently deliver sounder advice on landscape management. We thus make a plea for the importance of creating platforms for dialogue across research communities working to improve the understanding of human–nature dynamics.
|
|
| 6. |
- Waitt, Gordon, et al.
(author)
-
Spotlight On ... The teleconference and its implications for geographical knowledge-sharing
- 2012
-
In: Geography. - 0016-7487. ; 97:1, s. 42-46
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The teleconference is now being applied in the broadband contexts of the minority world, or Global North1, by both geography teachers and researchers as well as by conference and seminar organisers. The implications for how teleconference technology transforms physical distance has long been considered in relation to businesses (Rosetti and Surynt, 1985) and teaching (Sherry, 1996). Here, we consider some wider implications for geographical knowledge-sharing that arise from teleconference technologies on the basis of a seminar series on landscape research between nine scholars who are simultaneously located in Sweden, Norway and Australia. What are the implications of virtual travel for geographical knowledge-sharing? Does the teleconference provide a route that satisfies the desire to be physically co-present with peers, while at the same time offering emancipation from the tyrannies of physical distance in geographical knowledge- sharing? This article explores these questions in two sections. The first outlines the importance of intermittent face-to-face meetings in conveying geographical knowledge and describes the teleconference seminar context that encouraged us to think about the importance of physical propinquity. The second section discusses our experiences and reflections on the teleconference as a knowledge-sharing technology that transformed physical co-presence. We conclude by discussing the wider geographical implications of applying teleconference technologies.
|
|
