SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  form:Ext_t

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Stout J) "

form:Search_simp_t: WFRF:(Stout J)

  • navigation:Result_t 1-10 navigation:of_t 31
hitlist:Modify_result_t
   
hitlist:Enumeration_thitlist:Reference_thitlist:Reference_picture_thitlist:Find_Mark_t
1.
  • Hudson, Lawrence N, et al. (creator_code:aut_t)
  • The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project
  • 2017
  • record:In_t: Ecology and Evolution. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 2045-7758. ; 7:1, s. 145-188
  • swepub:Mat_article_t (swepub:level_refereed_t)abstract
    • The PREDICTS project-Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems (www.predicts.org.uk)-has collated from published studies a large, reasonably representative database of comparable samples of biodiversity from multiple sites that differ in the nature or intensity of human impacts relating to land use. We have used this evidence base to develop global and regional statistical models of how local biodiversity responds to these measures. We describe and make freely available this 2016 release of the database, containing more than 3.2 million records sampled at over 26,000 locations and representing over 47,000 species. We outline how the database can help in answering a range of questions in ecology and conservation biology. To our knowledge, this is the largest and most geographically and taxonomically representative database of spatial comparisons of biodiversity that has been collated to date; it will be useful to researchers and international efforts wishing to model and understand the global status of biodiversity.
  •  
2.
  • Hudson, Lawrence N., et al. (creator_code:aut_t)
  • The PREDICTS database : a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts
  • 2014
  • record:In_t: Ecology and Evolution. - : Wiley. - 2045-7758. ; 4:24, s. 4701-4735
  • swepub:Mat_article_t (swepub:level_refereed_t)abstract
    • Biodiversity continues to decline in the face of increasing anthropogenic pressures such as habitat destruction, exploitation, pollution and introduction of alien species. Existing global databases of species' threat status or population time series are dominated by charismatic species. The collation of datasets with broad taxonomic and biogeographic extents, and that support computation of a range of biodiversity indicators, is necessary to enable better understanding of historical declines and to project - and avert - future declines. We describe and assess a new database of more than 1.6 million samples from 78 countries representing over 28,000 species, collated from existing spatial comparisons of local-scale biodiversity exposed to different intensities and types of anthropogenic pressures, from terrestrial sites around the world. The database contains measurements taken in 208 (of 814) ecoregions, 13 (of 14) biomes, 25 (of 35) biodiversity hotspots and 16 (of 17) megadiverse countries. The database contains more than 1% of the total number of all species described, and more than 1% of the described species within many taxonomic groups - including flowering plants, gymnosperms, birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, beetles, lepidopterans and hymenopterans. The dataset, which is still being added to, is therefore already considerably larger and more representative than those used by previous quantitative models of biodiversity trends and responses. The database is being assembled as part of the PREDICTS project (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems - ). We make site-level summary data available alongside this article. The full database will be publicly available in 2015.
  •  
3.
  • Woodcock, B. A., et al. (creator_code:aut_t)
  • Meta-analysis reveals that pollinator functional diversity and abundance enhance crop pollination and yield
  • 2019
  • record:In_t: Nature Communications. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2041-1723. ; 10:1
  • swepub:Mat_article_t (swepub:level_refereed_t)abstract
    • How insects promote crop pollination remains poorly understood in terms of the contribution of functional trait differences between species. We used meta-analyses to test for correlations between community abundance, species richness and functional trait metrics with oilseed rape yield, a globally important crop. While overall abundance is consistently important in predicting yield, functional divergence between species traits also showed a positive correlation. This result supports the complementarity hypothesis that pollination function is maintained by non-overlapping trait distributions. In artificially constructed communities (mesocosms), species richness is positively correlated with yield, although this effect is not seen under field conditions. As traits of the dominant species do not predict yield above that attributed to the effect of abundance alone, we find no evidence in support of the mass ratio hypothesis. Management practices increasing not just pollinator abundance, but also functional divergence, could benefit oilseed rape agriculture.
  •  
4.
  • Cole, Lorna J., et al. (creator_code:aut_t)
  • A critical analysis of the potential for EU Common Agricultural Policy measures to support wild pollinators on farmland
  • 2020
  • record:In_t: Journal of Applied Ecology. - : Wiley. - 0021-8901 .- 1365-2664. ; 57:4, s. 681-694
  • swepub:Mat_article_t (swepub:level_refereed_t)abstract
    • Agricultural intensification and associated loss of high-quality habitats are key drivers of insect pollinator declines. With the aim of decreasing the environmental impact of agriculture, the 2014 EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) defined a set of habitat and landscape features (Ecological Focus Areas: EFAs) farmers could select from as a requirement to receive basic farm payments. To inform the post-2020 CAP, we performed a European-scale evaluation to determine how different EFA options vary in their potential to support insect pollinators under standard and pollinator-friendly management, as well as the extent of farmer uptake. A structured Delphi elicitation process engaged 22 experts from 18 European countries to evaluate EFAs options. By considering life cycle requirements of key pollinating taxa (i.e. bumble bees, solitary bees and hoverflies), each option was evaluated for its potential to provide forage, bee nesting sites and hoverfly larval resources. EFA options varied substantially in the resources they were perceived to provide and their effectiveness varied geographically and temporally. For example, field margins provide relatively good forage throughout the season in Southern and Eastern Europe but lacked early-season forage in Northern and Western Europe. Under standard management, no single EFA option achieved high scores across resource categories and a scarcity of late season forage was perceived. Experts identified substantial opportunities to improve habitat quality by adopting pollinator-friendly management. Improving management alone was, however, unlikely to ensure that all pollinator resource requirements were met. Our analyses suggest that a combination of poor management, differences in the inherent pollinator habitat quality and uptake bias towards catch crops and nitrogen-fixing crops severely limit the potential of EFAs to support pollinators in European agricultural landscapes. Policy Implications. To conserve pollinators and help protect pollination services, our expert elicitation highlights the need to create a variety of interconnected, well-managed habitats that complement each other in the resources they offer. To achieve this the Common Agricultural Policy post-2020 should take a holistic view to implementation that integrates the different delivery vehicles aimed at protecting biodiversity (e.g. enhanced conditionality, eco-schemes and agri-environment and climate measures). To improve habitat quality we recommend an effective monitoring framework with target-orientated indicators and to facilitate the spatial targeting of options collaboration between land managers should be incentivised.
  •  
5.
  • Hammen, V. C., et al. (creator_code:aut_t)
  • Establishment of a cross-European field site network in the ALARM project for assessing large-scale changes in biodiversity
  • 2010
  • record:In_t: Environmental Monitoring & Assessment. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1573-2959 .- 0167-6369. ; 164:1-4, s. 337-348
  • swepub:Mat_article_t (swepub:level_refereed_t)abstract
    • The field site network (FSN) plays a central role in conducting joint research within all Assessing Large-scale Risks for biodiversity with tested Methods (ALARM) modules and provides a mechanism for integrating research on different topics in ALARM on the same site for measuring multiple impacts on biodiversity. The network covers most European climates and biogeographic regions, from Mediterranean through central European and boreal to subarctic. The project links databases with the European-wide field site network FSN, including geographic information system (GIS)-based information to characterise the test location for ALARM researchers for joint on-site research. Maps are provided in a standardised way and merged with other site-specific information. The application of GIS for these field sites and the information management promotes the use of the FSN for research and to disseminate the results. We conclude that ALARM FSN sites together with other research sites in Europe jointly could be used as a future backbone for research proposals.
  •  
6.
  • Alejandre, Elizabeth M., et al. (creator_code:aut_t)
  • Characterization Factors to Assess Land Use Impacts on Pollinator Abundance in Life Cycle Assessment
  • 2023
  • record:In_t: Environmental Science and Technology. - : American Chemical Society (ACS). - 0013-936X .- 1520-5851. ; 57:8, s. 3445-3454
  • swepub:Mat_article_t (swepub:level_refereed_t)abstract
    • While wild pollinators play a key role in global food production, their assessment is currently missing from the most commonly used environmental impact assessment method, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). This is mainly due to constraints in data availability and compatibility with LCA inventories. To target this gap, relative pollinator abundance estimates were obtained with the use of a Delphi assessment, during which 25 experts, covering 16 nationalities and 45 countries of expertise, provided scores for low, typical, and high expected abundance associated with 24 land use categories. Based on these estimates, this study presents a set of globally generic characterization factors (CFs) that allows translating land use into relative impacts to wild pollinator abundance. The associated uncertainty of the CFs is presented along with an illustrative case to demonstrate the applicability in LCA studies. The CFs based on estimates that reached consensus during the Delphi assessment are recommended as readily applicable and allow key differences among land use types to be distinguished. The resulting CFs are proposed as the first step for incorporating pollinator impacts in LCA studies, exemplifying the use of expert elicitation methods as a useful tool to fill data gaps that constrain the characterization of key environmental impacts.
  •  
7.
  • Axfors, Cathrine, et al. (creator_code:aut_t)
  • Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials
  • 2021
  • record:In_t: Nature Communications. - : Springer Nature. - 2041-1723. ; 12:1
  • swepub:Mat_article_t (swepub:level_refereed_t)abstract
    • Substantial COVID-19 research investment has been allocated to randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine, which currently face recruitment challenges or early discontinuation. We aim to estimate the effects of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine on survival in COVID-19 from all currently available RCT evidence, published and unpublished. We present a rapid meta-analysis of ongoing, completed, or discontinued RCTs on hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine treatment for any COVID-19 patients (protocol: https://osf.io/QESV4/). We systematically identified unpublished RCTs (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Cochrane COVID-registry up to June 11, 2020), and published RCTs (PubMed, medRxiv and bioRxiv up to October 16, 2020). All-cause mortality has been extracted (publications/preprints) or requested from investigators and combined in random-effects meta-analyses, calculating odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), separately for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine. Prespecified subgroup analyses include patient setting, diagnostic confirmation, control type, and publication status. Sixty-three trials were potentially eligible. We included 14 unpublished trials (1308 patients) and 14 publications/preprints (9011 patients). Results for hydroxychloroquine are dominated by RECOVERY and WHO SOLIDARITY, two highly pragmatic trials, which employed relatively high doses and included 4716 and 1853 patients, respectively (67% of the total sample size). The combined OR on all-cause mortality for hydroxychloroquine is 1.11 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.20; I-2=0%; 26 trials; 10,012 patients) and for chloroquine 1.77 (95%CI: 0.15, 21.13, I-2=0%; 4 trials; 307 patients). We identified no subgroup effects. We found that treatment with hydroxychloroquine is associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients, and there is no benefit of chloroquine. Findings have unclear generalizability to outpatients, children, pregnant women, and people with comorbidities. Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine have been investigated as a potential treatment for Covid-19 in several clinical trials. Here the authors report a meta-analysis of published and unpublished trials, and show that treatment with hydroxychloroquine for patients with Covid-19 was associated with increased mortality, and there was no benefit from chloroquine.
  •  
8.
  •  
9.
  •  
10.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • navigation:Result_t 1-10 navigation:of_t 31
swepub:Mat_t
swepub:mat_article_t (28)
swepub:mat_conferencepaper_t (2)
swepub:mat_researchreview_t (1)
swepub:Level_t
swepub:level_refereed_t (27)
swepub:level_scientificother_t (4)
swepub:Hitlist_author_t
Stout, Jane C. (9)
Albrecht, Matthias (6)
Rundlöf, Maj (5)
Petanidou, Theodora (5)
Schweiger, Oliver (5)
Paxton, Robert J. (4)
deldatabas:search_more_t
Aizen, Marcelo A. (4)
Lange, C. (3)
Abrahamczyk, Stefan (3)
Guglielmetti, L (3)
Tamburini, Giovanni (3)
Entling, Martin H. (3)
Goulson, Dave (3)
Herzog, Felix (3)
Potts, Simon G. (3)
Tscharntke, Teja (3)
Woodcock, Ben A. (3)
Poveda, Katja (3)
Klein, Alexandra Mar ... (3)
Cambau, E (3)
Samnegård, Ulrika (3)
Sadler, Jonathan P. (3)
Purvis, Andy (3)
Wagner, D (3)
Bottero, Irene (3)
Dominik, Christophe (3)
Brown, Mark J.F. (3)
Cini, Elena (3)
Costa, Cecilia (3)
De la Rúa, Pilar (3)
Rodrigues De Miranda ... (3)
Di Prisco, Gennaro (3)
Hodge, Simon (3)
Martínez-López, Vice ... (3)
Medrzycki, Piotr (3)
Raimets, Risto (3)
Schwarz, Janine M. (3)
Senapathi, Deepa (3)
van Ingen, J. (3)
Tortoli, E (3)
Bottger, EC (3)
Tylianakis, Jason M. (3)
Power, Eileen F. (3)
De Palma, Adriana (3)
Peres, Carlos A. (3)
Daley, CL (3)
Wallace, RJ (3)
Andrejak, C (3)
Griffith, DE (3)
Huitt, GA (3)
deldatabas:search_less_t
swepub:Hitlist_uni_t
swepub_uni:lu_t (12)
swepub_uni:ki_t (9)
swepub_uni:slu_t (7)
swepub_uni:uu_t (4)
swepub_uni:umu_t (3)
swepub_uni:lnu_t (2)
deldatabas:search_more_t
swepub_uni:gu_t (1)
swepub_uni:ltu_t (1)
swepub_uni:su_t (1)
swepub_uni:liu_t (1)
deldatabas:search_less_t
hitlist:Language_t
language:Eng_t (31)
hitlist:HSV_t
hsv:Cat_1_t (11)
hsv:Cat_3_t (8)
hsv:Cat_4_t (5)

hitlist:Year_t

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt tools:Close_t

tools:Permalink_label_t