| 1. |
- Baumgartner, T., et al.
(författare)
-
A survey of the European Reference Network EpiCARE on clinical practice for selected rare epilepsies
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Epilepsia Open. - : Wiley. - 2470-9239. ; 6:1, s. 160-170
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: Clinical care of rare and complex epilepsies is challenging, because evidence-based treatment guidelines are scarce, the experience of many physicians is limited, and interdisciplinary treatment of comorbidities is required. The pathomechanisms of rare epilepsies are, however, increasingly understood, which potentially fosters novel targeted therapies. The objectives of our survey were to obtain an overview of the clinical practice in European tertiary epilepsy centers treating patients with 5 arbitrarily selected rare epilepsies and to get an estimate of potentially available patients for future studies. Methods: Members of the European Reference Network for rare and complex epilepsies (EpiCARE) were invited to participate in a web-based survey on clinical practice of patients with Dravet syndrome, tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), autoimmune encephalitis, and progressive myoclonic epilepsies including Unverricht Lundborg and Unverricht-like diseases. A consensus-based questionnaire was generated for each disease. Results: Twenty-six of 30 invited epilepsy centers participated. Cohorts were present in most responding centers for TSC (87%), Dravet syndrome (85%), and autoimmune encephalitis (71%). Patients with TSC and Dravet syndrome represented the largest cohorts in these centers. The antiseizure drug treatments were rather consistent across the centers especially with regard to Dravet syndrome, infantile spasms in TSC, and Unverricht Lundborg / Unverricht-like disease. Available, widely used targeted therapies included everolimus in TSC and immunosuppressive therapies in autoimmune encephalitis. Screening for comorbidities was routinely done, but specific treatment protocols were lacking in most centers. Significance: The survey summarizes the current clinical practice for selected rare epilepsies in tertiary European epilepsy centers and demonstrates consistency as well as heterogeneity in the treatment, underscoring the need for controlled trials and recommendations. The survey also provides estimates for potential participants of clinical trials recruited via EpiCARE, emphasizing the great potential of Reference Networks for future studies to evaluate new targeted therapies and to identify novel biomarkers. © 2020 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy
|
|
| 2. |
- Markhus, R., et al.
(författare)
-
EEG in fitness to drive evaluations in people with epilepsy - Considerable variations across Europe
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy. - : Elsevier BV. - 1059-1311. ; 79, s. 56-60
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: Epilepsy patients consider driving issues to be one of their most serious concerns. Ideally, decisions regarding fitness to drive should be based upon thorough evaluations by specialists in epilepsy care. In 2009, an EU directive was published aiming to harmonize evaluation practices within European countries, but, despite these recommendations, whether all epileptologists use the same criteria is unclear. We therefore conducted this study to investigate routine practices on how epileptologists at European epilepsy centers evaluate fitness to drive. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to 63 contact persons identified through the European Epi-Care and the Epilepsy network. The questionnaire addressed how fitness-to-drive evaluations were conducted, the involvement of different professionals, the use and interpretation of EEG, and opinions on existing regulations and guidelines. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 35 participants (56 % response rate). Results showed considerable variation regarding test routines and the emphasis placed on the occurrence and extent of epileptiform discharges revealed by EEG. 82 % of the responders agreed that there was a need for more research on how to better evaluate fitness-to-drive in people with epilepsy, and 89 % agreed that regulations on fitness to drive evaluations should be internationally coordinated. Conclusion: Our survey showed considerable variations among European epileptologists regarding use of EEG and how findings of EEG pathology should be assessed in fitness-to-drive evaluations. There is a clear need for more research on this issue and international guidelines on how such evaluations should be carried out would be of value.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Zelano, Johan, 1981, et al.
(författare)
-
Report of the ILAE SUDEP Task Force on national recommendations and practices around the world regarding the use of wearable seizure detection devices: A global survey
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Epilepsia Open. - 2470-9239.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Wearable seizure detection devices have the potential to address unmet needs of people with epilepsy. A recently published evidence-based international guideline recommends using such devices for safety indications in patients with tonic-clonic seizures (TCS). Our objective was to map existing guidelines and clinical practices at national level. We conducted a survey of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) chapters regarding national recommendations and practical circumstances for prescribing seizure detection devices, and another survey of physicians in the ILAE constituency anywhere in the world, concerning their views and practices regarding recommendations for and prescription of such devices. Fifty-eight ILAE chapters (response rate 48%) and 157 physicians completed the surveys. More than two-thirds of responding countries do not have standards on wearables for seizure detection, although they indicated availability of such devices. The most often recognized indications were safety and objective seizure quantification. In nearly half of countries, devices are purchased by patients or caregivers, and either lack a uniform reimbursement scheme (41%) or patients pay the full cost for the device (48%). Tonic-clonic seizure frequency, nocturnal seizures, and previous injuries were the main factors that influenced the surveyed physicians to recommend wearable seizure detection devices. Our results document the need to implement international clinical practice guidelines at national level and to consider these when deciding upon reimbursement of seizure detection devices.
|
|
