| 1. |
- Ebbesson, Esbjörn, 1979-, et al.
(författare)
-
Criteria for social software implementation in Living Labs
- 2012
-
Ingår i: ISM 2012 workshop proceedings. - Trondheim : Akademika forlag. - 9788232100880 ; , s. 32-40
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Halmstad Living Lab has extended experience of working closely with end-users in cocreation projects and has, during recent years, started to experiment more and more with social software and other online software programs to include users in the innovation process. In this paper we draw upon our experiences as a Living Lab to generate a framework that details key criteria for implementation of social software in a Living Lab setting. The framework can be used to guide successful implementation of social software in co-creation projects and to help evaluate or assess proposed solutions to be used in a Living Lab setting to support user involvement.
|
|
| 2. |
- Svensson, Jesper, 1976-, et al.
(författare)
-
Facilitating Social and Cognitive Translation in Innovation Networks
- 2010
-
Ingår i: MCIS 2010 Proceedings. - 9789655554748 ; , s. Paper 85-
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this paper we present a two year long interpretative case study based on a Living Lab project. The case study is used to in retrospect investigate cognitive and social translation in a doubly distributed innovation network. By identifying and empirically exemplify how translations occurred, we present insights of how to support cognitive and social translations in these kind of networks. Using the concepts from Yoo et al. (2009) we explore the research question: how can cognitive and social translation be supported in Living Labs? Based on the findings we conclude that Living Labs can support heterogeneous set of actors and knowledge resources by supporting cognitive translation with techniques such as scenarios, mock-ups and prototypes. By working with an iterative process the involved actors can be supported to materialize prior and new knowledge which can be translated between different communities of actors. By setting up and providing a common ground a trading zone can be established supporting the social translations within the network by offering a space where negotiation of interests and alignment of perspectives can be facilitated.
|
|
| 3. |
- Svensson, Jesper, 1976-, et al.
(författare)
-
Methods and Techniques for User Contribution : Challenges from a Living Lab Perspective
- 2009
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper discusses user contribution in innovation processes from a Living Labperspective. We view Living Lab as a milieu in which specific methods are used to involvedifferent stakeholders in open innovation processes to create and validate IT-products andservices in a real world setting. The involvement of different stakeholders is of particular importance in a Living Lab to secure the development of usable products and services. In thispaper we focus on methods and techniques for user contribution in innovation processes by discussing our own experiences based on 100 activities conducted within four differentresearch projects. The purpose of this paper is to discuss our experiences of methods andtechniques for user contribution in relation to three different aspects: a) phase in the innovation process, b) kind of user contribution and c) type of users, all in relation to a Living Lab perspective. We conclude that there is a need to translate face to face methods and techniques to distributed user involvement activities to be able to scale up and use these in a Living Lab setting.
|
|
| 4. |
- Svensson, Jesper, 1976-, et al.
(författare)
-
User Contribution in Innovation Processes : Reflections from a Living Lab Perspective
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. - Los Alamitos : IEEE Computer Society. - 9780769538693 - 076953869X ; , s. 1607-1616
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper discusses user contribution in innovation processes from a Living Lab perspective. In this paper we focus on methods and techniques for user contribution in innovation processes by discussing our own experiences based on 100 activities conducted within four different research projects over a period of five years. The purpose of this paper is to discuss our experiences of methods and techniques for user contribution in innovation processes, in relation Living Labs, as well as to: a) phase in the innovation process, b) kind of user contribution and c) type of users. Our contribution is threefold, we have: (1) theoretically modified the CIC model to better suit a Living Lab milieu, (2) empirically discussed methods and techniques for user contribution in relation to the modified model, and (3) identified several issues regarding different kinds of user contribution and types of users that need to be considered in Living Labs. © 2010 IEEE.
|
|
