| 1. |
- Berntsson Svensson, Richard, 1978-, et al.
(författare)
-
BAM : backlog assessment method
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. - Cham : Springer Verlag. - 1865-1348. - 9783030190330 ; , s. 53-68
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- The necessity of software as stand-alone products, and as central parts of non-traditional software products have changed how software products are developed. It started with the introduction of the agile manifesto and has resulted in a change of how software process improvements (SPI) are conducted. Although there are agile SPI methods and several agile practices for evaluating and improving current processes and ways-of-working, no method or practices for evaluating the backlog exists. To address this gap, the Backlog Assessment Method (BAM) was developed and applied in collaboration with Telenor Sweden. BAM enables agile organizations to assess backlogs, and assure that the backlog items are good-enough for their needs and well aligned with the decision process. The results from the validation show that BAM is feasible and relevant in an industrial environment, and it indicates that BAM is useful as a tool to perform analysis of items in a specific backlog. © The Author(s) 2019.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Johansson, Lars-Olof, et al.
(författare)
-
A Boundary Practice Perspective on Co-creation of ICT Innovations
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Nordic Contributions in IS Research. - Cham : Springer Publishing Company. - 9783319435961 - 9783319435978 ; , s. 100-115
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Research has shown that collaboration and co-creation among different groups of stakeholders add complexity and challenges to the innovation process. In this paper a study of co-creation in a multi-stakeholder innovation process is presented. The co-creation is explored and described from a boundary practice perspective. The empirical data presented in the study is based on a user-centric innovation project, Free2Ride, where researchers, developers and members of two equestrian clubs co-created a piece of ICT safety equipment consisting of a transmitter (on the horse) and a receiver (application on a smartphone) to be used by equestrian club members during their everyday riding activities. Three episodes were extracted from the empirical data and presented in the paper. From these episodes the researchers have identified four characteristics of the spanning of boundaries in co-creation from a boundary practice perspective. One of the contributions in the papers is a description of boundary practice-spanning. The research approach adopted in the study is the action case approach.
|
|
| 4. |
- Karatsivos, Evripidis, et al.
(författare)
-
Disturbance Management in a DC Grid using a Hierarchical Control Structure
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Lund Symposium 27/28 May, 2015.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- DC grids will play a key role in the future, interconnecting generation and load centers as well as energy markets. Large multi-terminal VSC-HVDC systems of high capacity will require automated coordination for several operation scenarios especially when operating under disturbances. With this in mind, and considering the dynamics of a DC system, communication loss events are considered severe disturbances in the operation of the multi-terminal system along with major electrical faults such as 3-phase faults on the AC sides of the converters that require considerable coordination efforts. This work aims at enabling the multi-terminal system with communication loss ride-through and automatic post-fault rescheduling capabilities. This is achieved within a hierarchical control structure whose features are briefly described. A 3-terminal VSC-HVDC system is modelled for the needs of demonstration under different operation scenarios. Communication loss ride-through capability is demonstrated by comparing the behavior of the 3-terminal system during a normal operation scenario and a worst-case scenario where communications with all-three terminals fail. Its behavior does not change but since communications fail, the operation is uncoordinated greatly reducing the security of the system regarding upcoming events. During 3-phase faults DC droop performs the primary control stabilizing the system. Secondary control is performed by the overall control after the system state is identified. Automatic, post-fault rescheduling takes place in an effort to follow the power flow schedule where possible without exceeding substation limits.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
