| 1. |
- Van der Speeten, Kurt
(författare)
-
A Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Rationale for Perioperative Cancer Chemotherapy in Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- 2010
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a common manifestation of both gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancies. Until recently, this condition was considered beyond curative intent treatment. Since the 1980s, new treatment strategies combining cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with perioperative intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy have emerged. The underlying hypothesis considers CRS responsible for the removal of the macroscopic disease and that perioperative chemotherapy should address the residual microscopic disease. These new treatment regimens have presented encouraging clinical results that contrast with prior failure. The parameters for perioperative chemotherapy are mainly extrapolated from literature on peritoneal dialysis and data from systemic chemotherapy. The overall aim of this thesis was to provide a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic rationale for perioperative intraperitoneal (IP) and intravenous (IV) chemotherapy in PC patients and, to assess its toxicity. After intraoperative IV administration of 5-fluorouracil or ifosfamide, substantial levels of these drugs were found inside the peritoneal fluid and tumor nodules (Papers I and II). This created a pharmacologically advantageous situation whereby a normothermic administered IV drug was subject to the effect of the local hyperthermia in the peritoneal fluid and tumor nodule. High levels of 5-fluouracil, ifosfamide and doxorubicin were observed inside the tumor nodules (Papers I, II and III) and, the identical pharmacokinetic advantage (expressed as Area Under the Curve (AUC) IP/IV ratios)) resulted in different drug levels of doxorubicin according to the density of the tumor nodules (Paper III). These data stressed the importance of pharmacodynamic variables such as tumor nodule density, size, and, vascularity. Therefore, the tumor nodule is proposed as a more appropriate pharmacological endpoint than AUC ratios. After IP Mitomycin C administration in PC patients with a contracted abdomen, mitomycin clearance from the abdomen decreased (Paper IV), which indicated these patients at risk of under-treatment. Consequently, these pharmacologic data indicate a change in dosimetry for these treatment protocols might be warranted according to the diffusion area. Although diffusional vectors are viewed the main driving force for these treatment protocols, only pharmacokinetic variables such as dose, volume and duration are considered. As pharmacodynamic variables are equally important in the pharmacological assessment of cytotoxic effect, the tumor nodule was proposed as the center of a new conceptual model (Paper I). Mitomycin C data on non-metabolizers ( Paper IV) indicated the cytotoxicity of these cancer chemotherapy protocols is at the level of the individual tumor nodules. The morbidity and mortality of a new bidirectional intraoperative chemotherapy regimen in PC patients was analyzed (Paper V) which provided a means for identifying subsets of patients at risk for increased toxicity. This thesis provides pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic guidance for improving perioperative chemotherapy treatment strategies in PC patients and reports its toxicity.
|
|
| 2. |
- Verwaal, Victor J., et al.
(författare)
-
Registries on peritoneal surface malignancies throughout the world, their use and their options
- 2017
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Hyperthermia. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0265-6736 .- 1464-5157. ; 33:5, s. 528-533
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim: The treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies ranges from palliative care to full cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy, HIPEC. Ongoing monitoring of patient recruitment and volume is usually carried out through dedicated registries. With multiple registries available worldwide, we sought to investigate the nature, extent and value of existing worldwide CRS and HIPEC registries. Methods: A questionnaire was sent out to all known major treatment centres. The questionnaire covers: general purpose of the registry; inclusion criteria in the registry; the date the registry was first established; volume of patients in the registry and description of the data fields in the registries. Finally, the population size of the catchment area of the registry was collected. Results: Twenty-seven questionnaires where returned. National databases are established in northwest European countries. There are five international general databases. Most database collect data on patients who have undergone an attempt to CRS and HIPEC. Two registries collect data on all patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis regardless the treatment. Most registries are primarily used for tracking outcomes and complications. When correlating the number of cases of CRS and HIPEC that are performed to the catchment area of the various registry, a large variation in the number of performed procedures related to the overall population was noted, ranging from 1.3 to 57 patients/million year with an average of 15 patients/1 million year. Conclusions: CRS and HIPEC is a well-established treatment for peritoneal surface malignancies worldwide. However, the coverage as well as the registration of treatment procedures differs widely. The most striking difference is the proportion of HIPEC procedures per capita which ranges from 1.3 to 57 patients per million. This suggests either a difference in patient selection, lack of access to HIPEC centres or lack of appropriate data collection.
|
|
