| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Janson, Eva Tiensuu, et al.
(författare)
-
Nordic guidelines 2014 for diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Acta Oncologica. - 0284-186X .- 1651-226X. ; 53:10, s. 1284-1297
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundThe diagnostic work-up and treatment of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has undergone major recent advances and new methods are currently introduced into the clinic. An update of the WHO classification has resulted in a new nomenclature dividing NENs into neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) including G1 (Ki67 index ≤ 2%) and G2 (Ki67 index 3-20%) tumours and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) with Ki67 index > 20%, G3. Aim. These Nordic guidelines summarise the Nordic Neuroendocrine Tumour Group's current view on how to diagnose and treat NEN-patients and are meant to be useful in the daily practice for clinicians handling these patients.
|
|
| 3. |
- Janson, Eva Tiensuu
(författare)
-
Somatostatin analogs in the treatment of neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic and intrathoracic tumors
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. - 0391-4097 .- 1720-8386. ; 28:11 Suppl International, s. 137-140
-
Forskningsöversikt (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Somatostatin is a peptide hormone that posses several biological functions of which inhibition of hormone secretion from endocrine cells is one. Neuroendocrine tumors usually express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), although the subtypes and number of SSTRs expressed in a certain tumor is very variable. The primary goal of somatostatin analog treatment is to decrease hormone production and secretion, resulting in control of hormone induced symptoms, while the ability of somatostatin analogs to retard tumor growth is less well documented. All patients considered for somatostatin analog treatment should undergo SSTR scintigraphy (111In-pentetreotide) to establish SSTR status, since the expression is usually correlated to therapeutic response. By this approach, it is possible to select patients suitable for treatment. Among patients with functioning neuroendocrine tumors expressing SSTR, more than 80% respond with symptomatic relief during somatostatin analog treatment, while treatment of non-functioning tumors still remains somewhat controversial.
|
|
| 4. |
- Janson, Eva Tiensuu
(författare)
-
Treatment of neuroendocrine tumors with somatostatin analogs
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Pituitary. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1386-341X .- 1573-7403. ; 9:3, s. 249-256
-
Forskningsöversikt (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Neuroendocrine tumors constitute a group of hormone producing tumors originating from neuroendocrine cells in different organs. Most tumors have a low proliferation index measured by Ki67 and the progression of the tumor is slow. However, many patients suffer from endocrine symptoms induced by the hormones produced and released by the tumor cells. For some patients these symptoms can be life- threatening as in midgut carcinoid patients suffering from carcinoid crises with extensive flushes and hypotension or in patients with severe diarrhea induced by tumors producing vasointestinal polypeptide. In many other patients the hormone-induced symptoms interfere with the ability to carry out ordinary daily activities. The introduction of somatostatin analogs in the treatment of these hormone related symptoms has made it possible to control most of them and has added significantly to the quality of life for this group of patients. Unfortunately, the clinical inhibitory effect on tumor growth has not been very good with only 5-10% of the patients showing an objective response. However, stabilization of tumor growth may be achieved in a significant number of patients. In the future, the hope is that development of new somatostatin analogs with broader receptor-binding profiles will give us new analogs which are more efficient with regard to their antiproliferative effect. This possibility will be studied in future trials.
|
|
| 5. |
- Wedin, Maria, 1977-, et al.
(författare)
-
Prevalence of metastases outside the liver and abdominal lymph nodes on 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT in patients with small intestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Journal of neuroendocrinology. - : Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc.. - 0953-8194 .- 1365-2826.
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Metastases outside the liver and abdominal/retroperitoneal lymph nodes are nowadays detected frequently in patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), owing to the high sensitivity of positron emission tomography (PET) with Gallium-68-DOTA-somatostatin analogues (68Ga-SSA) and concomitant diagnostic computed tomography (CT). Our aim was to determine the prevalence of extra-abdominal metastases on 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT in a cohort of patients with small intestinal (Si-NET) and pancreatic NET (Pan-NET), as well as that of pancreatic metastasis in patients with Si-NET. Among 2090 patients examined by 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT at two tertiary referral centres, a total of 1177 patients with a history of Si- or Pan-NET, were identified. The most recent 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT report for each patient was reviewed, and the location and number of metastases of interest were recorded. Lesions outside the liver and abdominal nodes were found in 26% of patients (n = 310/1177), of whom 21.5% (255/1177) were diagnosed with Si-NET and 4.5% (55/1177) Pan-NET. Bone metastases were found in 18.4% (215/1177), metastases to Virchow's lymph node in 7.1% (83/1177), and lung/pleura in 4.8% (56/1177). In the subset of 255 Si-NET patients, 5.4% (41/255) manifested lesions in the pancreas, 1.5% in the breast (18/255), 1.3% in the heart (15/255) and 1% in the orbita (12/255). In Si-NET patients, the Ki-67 proliferation index was higher in those with ≥2 metastatic sites of interest, than with 1 metastatic site, (p <0.001). Overall, extra-abdominal or pancreatic metastases were more often found in patients with Si-NET (34%) than in those with Pan-NET (13%) (p <0.001). Bone metastases were 2.6 times more frequent in patients with Si-NET compared to Pan-NET patients (p <0.001). Lesions to the breast and orbita were encountered in almost only Si-NET patients. In conclusion, lesions outside the liver and abdominal nodes were detected in as many as 26% of the patients, with different prevalence and metastatic patterns in patients with Si-NET compared to Pan-NET. The impact of such metastases on overall survival and clinical decision-making needs further evaluation.
|
|
