| 1. |
- Fokkema, Marieke L., et al.
(författare)
-
Outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention for different indications : long-term results from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR)
- 2016
-
Ingår i: EuroIntervention. - Toulouse, France : Europa Edition. - 1774-024X .- 1969-6213. ; 12:3, s. 303-311
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome for different indications for PCI in an unselected, nationwide PCI population at short- and long-term follow-up.Methods and results: We evaluated clinical outcome up to six years after PCI in all patients undergoing a PCI procedure for different indications in Sweden between 2006 and 2010. A total of 70,479 patients were treated for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) (21.0%), unstable angina (11.0%), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (36.6%) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (31.4%). Mortality was higher in STEMI patients at one year after PCI (9.6%) compared to NSTEMI (4.7%), unstable angina (2.2%) and stable CAD (2.0%). At one year after PCI until the end of follow-up, the adjusted mortality risk (one to six years after PCI) and the risk of myocardial infarction were comparable between NSTEMI and STEMI patients and lower in patients with unstable angina and stable CAD. The adjusted risk of stent thrombosis and heart failure was highest in STEMI patients.Conclusions: The risk of short-term mortality, heart failure and stent thrombosis is highest for STEMI patients after PCI. Therapies to reduce stent thrombosis and heart failure appear to be most important in decreasing mortality in patients with STEMI or NSTEMI undergoing PCI.
|
|
| 2. |
- Jensen, Ulf J., et al.
(författare)
-
The role of a simulator-based course in coronary angiography on performance in real life cath lab
- 2014
-
Ingår i: BMC Medical Education. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1472-6920. ; 14, s. 49-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The aim of this study was to explore if a course consisting of lectures combined with simulator training in coronary angiography (CA) could accelerate the early learning curve when performing CA on patients. Knowledge in performing CA is included in the curriculum for the general cardiologist. The method, according to American College of Cardiology and European Society of Cardiology guidelines, for this training is not well defined but simulator training is proposed to be an option. However, the transfer effect from a CA simulator to performance in real world cath lab is not validated. Methods: Fifty-four residents without practical skills in CA completed the course and 12 continued to training in invasive cardiology. These residents were tracked in the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry and compared to a control group of 46 novel operators for evaluation of performance metrics. A total of 4472 CAs were analyzed. Results: Course participants demonstrated no consistent acceleration in the early learning curve in real world cath lab. They had longer fluoroscopy time compared to controls (median 360 seconds (IQR 245-557) vs. 289 seconds (IQR 179-468), p < 0.001). Safety measures also indicated more complications appearing at the ward, in particular when using the femoral approach (6.25% vs. 2.53%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Since the results of this retrospective non-randomized study were negative, the role of a structured course including simulator training for skills acquisition in CA is still uncertain. Randomized transfer studies are warranted to justify further use of simulators for training in CA
|
|
| 3. |
- Jensen, Ulf J., et al.
(författare)
-
The use of fluoroscopy to construct learning curves for coronary angiography
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions. - : Wiley. - 1522-1946 .- 1522-726X. ; 80:4, s. 564-569
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives:The aim of this study was to assess learning curves for coronary angiography using registry data from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR).Background:ACC and ESC guidelines for cardiologists in training recommend 200300 coronary angiographies as primary operator. Whether this is safe or sufficient to reach an adequate proficiency level is not known. The development of learning curves and factors that can determine progress is not yet clearly stated.Methods:We extracted data from SCAAR 20052009 and identified 20 novel and 21 expert operators in coronary angiography during this observation period. Metrics possibly influenced by proficiency level were compared between the two groups. Learning curves were then identified with the expert's performance as reference defined as interquartile range (IQR).Results:Data from a total of 24,000 coronary angiographies were examined. Beginners used similar volumes of contrast but had longer fluoroscopy time compared with experts. Fluoroscopy time appeared to be a metric that demonstrated a clear learning curve and beginners reached experts IQR in 50 % (median) of the procedures after similar to 140 coronary angiographies. The risk of complications was independently associated with fluoroscopy time.Conclusions:Fluoroscopy time seems to be the best metric to determine coronary angiography performance level and might therefore be a good proficiency measure during training. On the basis of our results we recommend the trainee to perform at least 150 coronary angiographies during supervision before proceeding with unsupervised procedures. It is not clear if the suggested number of procedures will result in decreased number of complications but the data suggests that fluoroscopy time might be a surrogate marker for complications.
|
|
| 4. |
- Jensen, Ulf, et al.
(författare)
-
Technical Skills Assessment in a Coronary Angiography Simulator for Construct Validation.
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Simulation in Healthcare: the Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. - 1559-713X. ; 8:5, s. 324-328
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate technical skills in a coronary angiography (CA) simulator to establish the performance level of trainees and experts in virtual CA.The traditional master-apprentice way of learning CA is by practicing on patients despite a known risk for complications during training. Safe CA training is warranted, and simulators might be one possibility. Simulators used must be validated regarding their ability to separate trainees from experts. Construct validation of a CA simulator, to our knowledge, has not yet been published. METHODS: Ten cardiology residents without experience in CA, 4 intermediate, and 10 CA experts performed 5 CAs in the Mentice VIST (Vascular Intervention Simulation Trainer). Metrics reflecting proficiency skills such as total procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume were extracted from the simulator computer and compared between the groups. All examinations were videotaped, and the number of handling errors was examined. The videos were evaluated by 2 experts blinded to the test object's performance level. RESULTS: Experts outperformed trainees in all metrics measured by the simulator. Improvement was demonstrated in all metrics through all 5 CAs. Furthermore, beginners had more handling errors compared with experts. CONCLUSIONS: Mentice VIST simulator can distinguish between trainees and experts in CA in the metrics extracted from the computer and therefore prove the concept of construct validity.
|
|
