| 1. |
- Mavaddat, Nasim, et al.
(författare)
-
Prediction of Breast Cancer Risk Based on Profiling With Common Genetic Variants
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1460-2105 .- 0027-8874. ; 107:5, s. 036-036
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Data for multiple common susceptibility alleles for breast cancer may be combined to identify women at different levels of breast cancer risk. Such stratification could guide preventive and screening strategies. However, empirical evidence for genetic risk stratification is lacking. Methods: We investigated the value of using 77 breast cancer-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for risk stratification, in a study of 33 673 breast cancer cases and 33 381 control women of European origin. We tested all possible pair-wise multiplicative interactions and constructed a 77-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS) for breast cancer overall and by estrogen receptor (ER) status. Absolute risks of breast cancer by PRS were derived from relative risk estimates and UK incidence and mortality rates. Results: There was no strong evidence for departure from a multiplicative model for any SNP pair. Women in the highest 1% of the PRS had a three-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer compared with women in the middle quintile (odds ratio [OR] = 3.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.95 to 3.83). The ORs for ER-positive and ER-negative disease were 3.73 (95% CI = 3.24 to 4.30) and 2.80 (95% CI = 2.26 to 3.46), respectively. Lifetime risk of breast cancer for women in the lowest and highest quintiles of the PRS were 5.2% and 16.6% for a woman without family history, and 8.6% and 24.4% for a woman with a first-degree family history of breast cancer. Conclusions: The PRS stratifies breast cancer risk in women both with and without a family history of breast cancer. The observed level of risk discrimination could inform targeted screening and prevention strategies. Further discrimination may be achievable through combining the PRS with lifestyle/environmental factors, although these were not considered in this report.
|
|
| 2. |
- Boita, Joana, et al.
(författare)
-
Development and content validity evaluation of a candidate instrument to assess image quality in digital mammography : A mixed-method study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Radiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0720-048X. ; 134
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: To develop a candidate instrument to assess image quality in digital mammography, by identifying clinically relevant features in images that are affected by lower image quality. Methods: Interviews with fifteen expert breast radiologists from five countries were conducted and analysed by using adapted directed content analysis. During these interviews, 45 mammographic cases, containing 44 lesions (30 cancers, 14 benign findings), and 5 normal cases, were shown with varying image quality. The interviews were performed to identify the structures from breast tissue and lesions relevant for image interpretation, and to investigate how image quality affected the visibility of those structures. The interview findings were used to develop tentative items, which were evaluated in terms of wording, understandability, and ambiguity with expert breast radiologists. The relevance of the tentative items was evaluated using the content validity index (CVI) and modified kappa index (k*). Results: Twelve content areas, representing the content of image quality in digital mammography, emerged from the interviews and were converted into 29 tentative items. Fourteen of these items demonstrated excellent CVI ≥ 0.78 (k* > 0.74), one showed good CVI < 0.78 (0.60 ≤ k* ≤ 0.74), while fourteen were of fair or poor CVI < 0.78 (k* ≤ 0.59). In total, nine items were deleted and five were revised or combined resulting in 18 items. Conclusions: By following a mixed-method methodology, a candidate instrument was developed that may be used to characterise the clinically-relevant impact that image quality variations can have on digital mammography.
|
|
| 3. |
- Boita, Joana, et al.
(författare)
-
How does image quality affect radiologists’ perceived ability for image interpretation and lesion detection in digital mammography?
- 2021
-
Ingår i: European Radiology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0938-7994 .- 1432-1084. ; 31:7, s. 5335-5343
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: To study how radiologists’ perceived ability to interpret digital mammography (DM) images is affected by decreases in image quality. Methods: One view from 45 DM cases (including 30 cancers) was degraded to six levels each of two acquisition-related issues (lower spatial resolution and increased quantum noise) and three post-processing-related issues (lower and higher contrast and increased correlated noise) seen during clinical evaluation of DM systems. The images were shown to fifteen breast screening radiologists from five countries. Aware of lesion location, the radiologists selected the most-degraded mammogram (indexed from 1 (reference) to 7 (most degraded)) they still felt was acceptable for interpretation. The median selected index, per degradation type, was calculated separately for calcification and soft tissue (including normal) cases. Using the two-sided, non-parametric Mann-Whitney test, the median indices for each case and degradation type were compared. Results: Radiologists were not tolerant to increases (medians: 1.5 (calcifications) and 2 (soft tissue)) or decreases (median: 2, for both types) in contrast, but were more tolerant to correlated noise (median: 3, for both types). Increases in quantum noise were tolerated more for calcifications than for soft tissue cases (medians: 3 vs. 4, p = 0.02). Spatial resolution losses were considered less acceptable for calcification detection than for soft tissue cases (medians: 3.5 vs. 5, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Perceived ability of radiologists for image interpretation in DM was affected not only by image acquisition-related issues but also by image post-processing issues, and some of those issues affected calcification cases more than soft tissue cases. Key Points: • Lower spatial resolution and increased quantum noise affected the radiologists’ perceived ability to interpret calcification cases more than soft tissue lesion or normal cases. • Post-acquisition image processing-related effects, not only image acquisition-related effects, also impact the perceived ability of radiologists to interpret images and detect lesions. • In addition to current practices, post-acquisition image processing-related effects need to also be considered during the testing and evaluation of digital mammography systems.
|
|
| 4. |
- Boita, Joana, et al.
(författare)
-
Validation of a candidate instrument to assess image quality in digital mammography using ROC analysis
- 2021
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Radiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1872-7727 .- 0720-048X. ; 139
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PurposeTo validate a candidate instrument, to be used by different professionals to assess image quality in digital mammography (DM), against detection performance results.MethodsA receiver operating characteristics (ROC) study was conducted to assess the detection performance in DM images with four different image quality levels due to different quality issues. Fourteen expert breast radiologists from five countries assessed a set of 80 DM cases, containing 60 lesions (40 cancers, 20 benign findings) and 20 normal cases. A visual grading analysis (VGA) study using a previously-described candidate instrument was conducted to evaluate a subset of 25 of the images used in the ROC study. Eight radiologists that had participated in the ROC study, and seven expert breast-imaging physicists, evaluated this subset. The VGA score (VGAS) and the ROC and visual grading characteristics (VGC) areas under the curve (AUCROC and AUCVGC) were compared.ResultsNo large differences in image quality among the four levels were detected by either ROC or VGA studies. However, the ranking of the four levels was consistent: level 1 (partial AUCROC: 0.070, VGAS: 6.77) performed better than levels 2 (0.066, 6.15), 3 (0.061, 5.82), and 4 (0.062, 5.37). Similarity between radiologists’ and physicists’ assessments was found (average VGAS difference of 10 %).ConclusionsThe results from the candidate instrument were found to correlate with those from ROC analysis, when used by either observer group. Therefore, it may be used by different professionals, such as radiologists, radiographers, and physicists, to assess clinically-relevant image quality variations in DM.
|
|
| 5. |
- Axelsson, Rebecca, et al.
(författare)
-
Simultaneous digital breast tomosynthesis and mechanical imaging in women recalled from screening - A preliminary analysis
- 2022
-
Ingår i: 16th International Workshop on Breast Imaging, IWBI 2022. - : SPIE. - 1996-756X .- 0277-786X. - 9781510655843 ; 12286
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- We have developed a method for simultaneous tomosynthesis and mechanical imaging, called DBTMI. Mechanical imaging measures the stress distribution over the compressed breast surface. Malignant tissue is usually stiffer than benign, which results in higher stress on the compressed breast and enables to distinguish malignant from benign findings. By combining tomosynthesis and mechanical imaging, we could improve cancer detection accuracy by reducing the number of false positive findings. In this study we have analysed clinical DBTMI data, collected from 52 women from an ongoing pilot study at the Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. We measured the range of the average stress over the breast surface, the range of average stress over the location of suspected lesions, and the normalized stress over the lesion location. Preliminary results show that the range of stress over the breast surface was 1.23-5.84 kPa, the range over the lesion location 2.10-10.10 kPa, and the normalized stress 1.12-2.44 over the lesion location. Overall, the local stress over malignant lesions was higher than the average stress over the entire breast surface. This is the first step investigating criteria to distinguish between malignant and benign findings based upon clinical DBTMI data.
|
|
| 6. |
- Bakic, Predrag R., et al.
(författare)
-
Evaluation of a flat fielding method for simultaneous DBT and MI acquisition
- 2020
-
Ingår i: 15th International Workshop on Breast Imaging, IWBI 2020. - : SPIE. - 0277-786X .- 1996-756X. - 9781510638310 ; 11513
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- We are developing a prototype system for simultaneous digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and mechanical imaging (MI). MI maps the local pressure distribution during clinical exams, to distinguish breast abnormalities from the normal tissue. Both DBT alone, and MI when combined with digital mammography, have demonstrated the ability to reduce false positives; however, the benefit of combining DBT with MI has not been investigated. A practical limitation in simultaneous DBT and MI is the presence of the MI sensor in DBT images. Metallic elements of the sensor generate noticeable artifacts, which may interfere with clinical analysis. Previously, we shown that the sensor artifacts can be reduced by flat fielding, which combines projections of the sensor acquired with and without the breast. In this paper we evaluate the flat fielding by assessing artifact reduction and visibility of breast abnormalities. Images of a physical anthropomorphic breast phantom were acquired using a clinical wide-angle DBT system. Visual evaluation was performed by experienced medical physicists. Image quality descriptors were calculated in images with and without flat fielding. To evaluate the visibility of abnormalities we estimated the full width at half maximum (FWHM) for calcifications modeled in the phantom. Our preliminary results suggest a substantial reduction of artifacts by flat fielding (on average 83%). Few noticeable artifacts remain near the breast edge, in the reconstructed image with the sensor in focus. We observed a 17% reduction in the FWHM. Future work would include a detailed assessment, and method optimization using virtual trials as a design aid.
|
|
| 7. |
- Bejnö, Anna, et al.
(författare)
-
Artificial intelligence together with mechanical imaging in mammography
- 2020
-
Ingår i: 15th International Workshop on Breast Imaging, IWBI 2020. - : SPIE. - 0277-786X .- 1996-756X. - 9781510638310 ; 11513
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Artificial intelligence (AI) applications are increasingly seeing use in breast imaging, particularly to assist in or automate the reading of mammograms. Another novel technique is mechanical imaging (MI) which estimates the relative stiffness of suspicious breast abnormalities by measuring the distribution of pressure on the compressed breast. This study investigates the feasibility of combining AI and MI information in breast imaging to provide further diagnostic information. Forty-six women recalled from screening were included in the analysis. Mammograms with findings scored on a suspiciousness scale by an AI tool, and corresponding pressure distributions were collected for each woman. The cases were divided into three groups by diagnosis; biopsy-proven cancer, biopsy-proven benign and non-biopsied, very likely benign. For all three groups, the relative increase of pressure at the location of the finding marked most suspicious by the AI software was recorded. A significant correlation between the relative pressure increase at the AI finding and the AI score was established in the group with cancer (p=0.043), but neither group of healthy women showed such a correlation. This study suggests that AI and MI indicate independent markers for breast cancer. The combination of these two methods has the potential to increase the accuracy of mammography screening, but further research is needed.
|
|
| 8. |
- Bick, Ulrich, et al.
(författare)
-
Image-guided breast biopsy and localisation : recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Insights into Imaging. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1869-4101. ; 11:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We summarise here the information to be provided to women and referring physicians about percutaneous breast biopsy and lesion localisation under imaging guidance. After explaining why a preoperative diagnosis with a percutaneous biopsy is preferred to surgical biopsy, we illustrate the criteria used by radiologists for choosing the most appropriate combination of device type for sampling and imaging technique for guidance. Then, we describe the commonly used devices, from fine-needle sampling to tissue biopsy with larger needles, namely core needle biopsy and vacuum-assisted biopsy, and how mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging work for targeting the lesion for sampling or localisation. The differences among the techniques available for localisation (carbon marking, metallic wire, radiotracer injection, radioactive seed, and magnetic seed localisation) are illustrated. Type and rate of possible complications are described and the issue of concomitant antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is also addressed. The importance of pathological-radiological correlation is highlighted: when evaluating the results of any needle sampling, the radiologist must check the concordance between the cytology/pathology report of the sample and the radiological appearance of the biopsied lesion. We recommend that special attention is paid to a proper and tactful approach when communicating to the woman the need for tissue sampling as well as the possibility of cancer diagnosis, repeat tissue sampling, and or even surgery when tissue sampling shows a lesion with uncertain malignant potential (also referred to as “high-risk” or B3 lesions). Finally, seven frequently asked questions are answered.
|
|
| 9. |
- Boll, Måns, et al.
(författare)
-
Evaluation of 3D printed contrast detail phantoms for mammography quality assurance
- 2022
-
Ingår i: 16th International Workshop on Breast Imaging, IWBI 2022. - : SPIE. - 0277-786X .- 1996-756X. - 9781510655843 ; 12286
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objects created by 3D printers are increasingly used in various medical applications. Today, affordable 3D printers, using Fused Deposition Modeling are widely available. In this project, a commercially available 3D printer was used to replicate a conventional radiographic contrast detail phantom. Printing materials were selected by comparing their x-ray attenuation properties. Two replicas were printed using polylactic acid, with different filling patterns. The printed phantoms were imaged by a clinical mammography system, using automatic exposure control. Phantom images were visually and quantitively compared to images of the corresponding conventional contrast detail phantom. Visual scoring of the contrast detail elements was performed by a medical physics student. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated for each phantom element. The diameter and thickness of the smallest visible phantom object were 0.44 mm and 0.09 mm, respectively, for both filling patterns. For the conventional phantom, the diameter and thickness of the smallest visible object were 0.31 mm and 0.09 mm. Visual inspection of printed phantoms revealed some linear artefacts. These artefacts were however not visible on mammographic projections. Quantitively, average CNR of printed phantom objects followed the same trend with an increase of average CNR with increasing disk height. However, there is a limitation of detail objects with disk diameters below 1.25 mm, caused by the available nozzle size. Based upon the encouraging results, future work will explore the use of different materials and smaller nozzle diameters.
|
|
| 10. |
- Dahlblom, Victor, et al.
(författare)
-
Correspondence between areas causing recall in breast cancer screening and artificial intelligence findings
- 2022
-
Ingår i: 16th International Workshop on Breast Imaging, IWBI 2022. - : SPIE. - 1996-756X .- 0277-786X. - 9781510655843 ; 12286
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- False positive recall is a major issue in breast cancer screening and the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) might affect which women who are unnecessarily recalled. We have investigated how an AI system works on false positive recalls at screening and compared with radiologist findings. Two-view digital mammography (DM) examinations from 656 recalled women (136 with screening detected cancer), were analysed with a commercial AI system. The AI findings were matched with the areas on the images causing the recalls. The agreement was studied both at the examination level and for individual findings. Scores were compared between true positive and false positive recalls. ROC analysis was used to study the AI-system's ability to distinguish between true and false positive recalls. It was also studied how the AI system performed on cases where there were discordant readings. AI identified the same areas as radiologists in 80% of the cases recalled on DM. For true positives both the proportion of matching areas and AI scores were higher than for false positive recalls. The AI system also had a relatively large AUC (0.83) for differentiating between false positive recalls and cancers. Further, the AI system identified most of the findings leading to recall in cases where only one of the readers had marked the case for discussion. There is a relatively large agreement between the AI system and radiologists. The AI system scores the false positives lower than true positives. AI complements a single reader in a way similar to a second reader.
|
|
