Search: WFRF:(Vilhelmson Bertil 1952 )
> Hysing Erik >
Compromising sustai...
Compromising sustainable mobility? The case of the Gothenburg congestion tax
-
- Hysing, Erik, 1977- (author)
- Örebro universitet,Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för ekonomi och samhälle, Kulturgeografi,Department of Economy and Society, Unit for Human Geography,Institutionen för humaniora, utbildnings- och samhällsvetenskap,Department of Economy and Society, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
-
- Frändberg, Lotta, 1964 (author)
- Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för ekonomi och samhälle, Kulturgeografi,Department of Economy and Society, Unit for Human Geography,Department of Economy and Society, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
-
- Vilhelmson, Bertil, 1952 (author)
- Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för ekonomi och samhälle, Kulturgeografi,Department of Economy and Society, Unit for Human Geography,Department of Economy and Society, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2014-05-27
- 2015
- English.
-
In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0964-0568 .- 1360-0559. ; 58:6
- Related links:
-
https://gup.ub.gu.se...
-
show more...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
show less...
Abstract
Subject headings
Close
- Congestion charging is widely considered an effective policy measure to regulate and reduce car traffic demand and associated environmental and health problems in cities. However, introducing restrictive measures to constrain individual choice and behaviour for the common good has often proven difficult. Using a specific case, the Gothenburg congestion tax introduced in 2013, we study the policy process behind the introduction of the tax and assess to what extent green values were compromised along the way. The tax was made possible by co-financing infrastructure investments, including roads, which seemingly contradicts stated goals of reducing car traffic and emissions. We show how the tax was ‘muddled through’ in a top-down political compromise by a grand coalition where different interests could legitimate their support in relation to the achievement of partially conflicting objectives and projects. However, to declare the regulatory goals fully neutralised would be to underestimate the scheme’s direct environmental effects and restrictive potential. Finding a compromise with powerful political and economic interests was necessary to get it off the ground. Once launched, however, it can over time regain its restrictive properties and lead to more profound long-term effects.
Subject headings
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Social och ekonomisk geografi -- Kulturgeografi (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Social and Economic Geography -- Human Geography (hsv//eng)
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Ekonomi och näringsliv (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Economics and Business (hsv//eng)
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Social och ekonomisk geografi (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Social and Economic Geography (hsv//eng)
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Statsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Political Science (hsv//eng)
Keyword
- congestion pricing; sustainable mobility; infrastructure financing; environmental policy; transport planning
- congestion pricing; environmental policy; infrastructure financing; sustainable mobility; transport planning
- Political Science
Publication and Content Type
- ref (subject category)
- art (subject category)
Find in a library
To the university's database