| 1. |
- Wärnberg, Fredrik, et al.
(författare)
-
Long-Term Outcome After Retro-Areolar Versus Peri-Tumoral Injection of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (SPIO) for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Breast Cancer Surgery.
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgical Oncology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1068-9265 .- 1534-4681. ; 26:5, s. 1247-1253
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: SPIO is effective in sentinel node (SN) detection. No nuclear medicine department is needed, and no allergic reactions have occurred. This study aimed to compare retro-areolar and peri-tumoral SPIO injections regarding skin staining, detection rates and number of SNs.METHODS: Data on staining size, intensity and cosmetic outcome (0-5; 0 = no problem) were collected by telephone interviews with 258 women undergoing breast conservation. SN detection and the number of SNs were prospectively registered in 332 women.RESULTS: After retro-areolar and peri-tumoral injections, 67.3% and 37.8% (p < 0.001) developed skin staining, with remaining staining in 46.2 vs. 9.4% after 36 months (p < 0.001). Initial mean size was 16.3 vs. 6.8 cm (p < 0.001) and after 36 months, 6.6 vs. 1.8 cm2 (p < 0.001). At 75.1% of 738 interviews, staining was reported paler. After retro-areolar injections, cosmetic outcome scored worse for 2 years. The mean (median) scores were 1.3(0) vs. 0.5(0) points, and 0.2(0) vs. 0.1(0) points, at 12 and 36 months, respectively. Overall detection rates were 98.3% and 97.4% (p = 0.43) and the number of SNs 1.35 vs. 1.57 (p = 0.02) after retro-areolar and peri-tumoral injections. Injection, regardless of type, 1-27 days before surgery increased detection rates with SPIO, 98.0% vs. 94.2% (p = 0.06) ,and SN numbers, 1.56 vs. 1.27 (p = 0.003).CONCLUSION: SPIO is effective and facilitates planning for surgery. Peri-tumoral injection reduced staining with a similar detection rate. Staining was not considered a cosmetic problem among most women. Injecting SPIO 1-27 days before surgery increased the detection rate by 3.8% and increased the number of SNs by 0.3.
|
|
| 2. |
- Karakatsanis, Andreas, et al.
(författare)
-
Effect of preoperative injection of superparamagnetic iron oxide particles on rates of sentinel lymph node dissection in women undergoing surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (SentiNot study)
- 2019
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 106:6, s. 720-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: One-fifth of patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have invasive breast cancer (IBC) on definitive histology. Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) is performed in almost half of women having surgery for DCIS in Sweden. The aim of the present study was to try to minimize unnecessary SLND by injecting superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles at the time of primary breast surgery, enabling SLND to be performed later, if IBC is found in the primary specimen. Methods: Women with DCIS at high risk for the presence of invasion undergoing breast conservation, and patients with DCIS undergoing mastectomy were included. The primary outcome was whether this technique could reduce SLND. Secondary outcomes were number of SLNDs avoided, detection rate and procedure-related costs. Results: This was a preplanned interim analysis of 189 procedures. IBC was found in 47 and a secondary SLND was performed in 41 women. Thus, 78.3 per cent of patients avoided SLND (P<0.001). At reoperation, SPIO plus blue dye outperformed isotope and blue dye in detection of the sentinel node (40 of 40 versus 26 of 40 women; P<0.001). Costs were reduced by a mean of 24.5 per cent in women without IBC (3990 versus 5286; P<0.001). Conclusion: Marking the sentinel node with SPIO in women having surgery for DCIS was effective at avoiding unnecessary SLND in this study. Registration number: ISRCTN18430240 (http://www.isrctn.com).
|
|
| 3. |
- Karakatsanis, Andreas, 1980-
(författare)
-
Sentinel Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer : Aspects and evolution
- 2018
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Sentinel Node Biopsy (SNB) in clinical practice was pivotal to the shaping of modern diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with breast cancer. The use of radioisotope (RI) and blue dye (BD) has led to high detection rates with low false negatives, but delivery-of-care limitations connected to these tracers as well as the need for methods addressing new clinical conundrums delineates the urge for new tracers with comparable performance, easier logistics and, ideally expanded implementations. Aim of the present thesis is to examine the outcomes of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles, a new tracer based on magnetism for the detection of the sentinel nodes.Paper I is a prospective multicentre trial comparing SPIO to RI+BD, with all tracers injected at the same patient. In 206 patients, SPIO had a similar detection rate (97.6 vs 97.1%, p=0.76) whereas concordance between methods was 98%. The study was completed by a meta-analysis of similar trials published until that point. The detection rates were comparable (fixed OR:1.10; 0.67,1.79, p=0.71), and so was concordance between tracers (fixed RD: 0.00; -0.01, 0.01, p=0.82). Discoloration was present after periareolar SPIO injection in 39% of patients, almost exclusively treated with breast conservation, which reduced to 8.6% after 15 months of follow-up.Paper II was a pilot study of twelve patients with breast cancer and SNB performed where SPIO and the combination of RI+BD were injected, but SPIO was injected up to 15 days preoperatively, with total success in detection and complete concordance.Paper III tested the performance of SPIO as a sole tracer in a pragmatic double-arm non-randomised trial comparing it to the combination of RI+BD. Detection was 95.7% for SPIO and 96.8% for RI (p = 0.59). The preoperative injection of SPIO (1-27 d) enhanced SPIO specific detection (95.7 vs 86%, p=0.002).Paper IV is an interim analysis of a multicentre cohort study including patients with high-risk DCIS planned for breast conservation or any DCIS planned for mastectomy. SPIO was injected to “mark” the sentinel node but SNB was performed in a second operation only if invasive cancer was found at the first operation. In 151 included patients, this technique led to avoidance of 81.5% SNB, with a cost reduction of 14.1% for the entire cohort and 25.8% for the patients that did not have invasive cancer. The detection rate at reoperation was superior for SPIO and comparable with SNB detection at primary operation.In conclusion, SPIO is a novel tracer for SNB in breast cancer with comparable performance, fit for performance in a global setting and with wider clinical implementations compared to RI+BD.
|
|
| 4. |
- Karakatsanis, Andreas, et al.
(författare)
-
Simplifying Logistics and Avoiding the Unnecessary in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Sentinel Node Biopsy. A Prospective Feasibility Trial of the Preoperative Injection of Super Paramagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. - : SAGE Publications. - 1457-4969 .- 1799-7267. ; 107:2, s. 130-137
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: Sentinel node is routinely localized with the intraoperative use of a radioactive tracer, involving challenging logistics. Super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle is a non-radioactive tracer with comparable performance that could allow for preoperative localization, would simplify the procedure, and possibly be of value in axillary mapping before neoadjuvant treatment. The current trial aimed to determine the a priori hypothesis that the injection of super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in the preoperative period for the localization of the sentinel node is feasible.METHODS: This is a prospective feasibility trial, conducted from 9 September 2014 to 22 October 2014 at Uppsala University Hospital. In all, 12 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer planned for resection of the primary and sentinel node biopsy were recruited. Super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles were injected in the preoperative visit in the outpatient clinic. The radioactive tracer (99mTc) and the blue dye were injected perioperatively in standard fashion. A volunteer was injected with super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles to follow the decline in the magnetic signal in the sentinel node over time. The primary outcome was successful sentinel node detection.RESULTS: Super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles' detection after preoperative injection (3-15 days) was successful in all cases (100%). In the volunteer, axillary signal was presented for 4 weeks. No adverse effects were noted. Conclusion and relevance: Preoperative super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles' injection is feasible and leads to successful detection of the sentinel node. That may lead to simplified logistics as well as the identification, sampling, and marking of the sentinel node in patients planned for neoadjuvant treatment.
|
|
| 5. |
- Schiza, Aglaia, et al.
(författare)
-
Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes add prognostic information for patients with low-risk DCIS : findings from the SweDCIS randomised radiotherapy trial
- 2022
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Cancer. - : Elsevier BV. - 0959-8049 .- 1879-0852. ; 168, s. 128-137
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The immune microenvironment is an important modulator of tumour progression and treatment response. In invasive breast cancer, assessment of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) provides prognostic and predictive information. However, the clinical impact of TILs for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has not yet been demonstrated.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the SweDCIS randomised radiotherapy trial including primary DCIS cases following breast-conserving surgery. TILs were assessed on haematoxylin-eosin sections (n = 711) according to the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group guidelines. TILs-scores were analysed as continuous and dichotomised (≤5% versus >5%) variable regarding ipsilateral breast events (IBEs) as the predefined primary endpoint.RESULTS: Most women (61.9%) showed a TILs prevalence of ≤5%. High TILs-scores were associated with larger lesion size, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positivity, higher nuclear grade, and KI67-score. DCIS cases with high TILs prevalence had a significant increased cumulative IBE incidence at five years post-surgery (TILslow-versus TILshigh 9% versus 18%; p < 0.001). Among patients with HER2-negative DCIS, high TILs remained an independent poor prognosis marker for IBE risk in multivariable analysis with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.41 [95%CI 1.17-4.95, p = 0.017]. Including TILs-status provided a refined stratification of patients with general low-risk DCIS (grade <3, size <25 mm, free margin). No interaction between TILs and radiotherapy benefits was detected.CONCLUSION: High TILs are associated with higher IBE risk over 5-years post-surgery, particularly for HER2-negative DCIS. Our data indicate that TILs should be integrated into the clinical workup to define patients with low-risk DCIS who can omit adjuvant therapy or patients with potential benefits from immunotherapy.
|
|
| 6. |
- Vallon-Christersson, Johan, et al.
(författare)
-
Cross comparison and prognostic assessment of breast cancer multigene signatures in a large population-based contemporary clinical series
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Scientific Reports. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2045-2322. ; 9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Multigene expression signatures provide a molecular subdivision of early breast cancer associated with patient outcome. A gap remains in the validation of such signatures in clinical treatment groups of patients within population-based cohorts of unselected primary breast cancer representing contemporary disease stages and current treatments. A cohort of 3520 resectable breast cancers with RNA sequencing data included in the population-based SCAN-B initiative (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02306096) were selected from a healthcare background population of 8587 patients diagnosed within the years 2010-2015. RNA profiles were classified according to 19 reported gene signatures including both gene expression subtypes (e.g. PAM50, IC10, CIT) and risk predictors (e.g. Oncotype DX, 70-gene, ROR). Classifications were analyzed in nine adjuvant clinical assessment groups: TNBC-ACT (adjuvant chemotherapy, n = 239), TNBC-untreated (n = 82), HER2+/ER- with anti-HER2+ ACT treatment (n = 110), HER2+/ER+ with anti-HER2 + ACT + endocrine treatment (n = 239), ER+/HER2-/LN- with endocrine treatment (n = 1113), ER+/HER2-/LN- with endocrine + ACT treatment (n = 243), ER+/HER2-/LN+ with endocrine treatment (n = 423), ER+/HER2-/LN+ with endocrine + ACT treatment (n = 433), and ER+/HER2-/LN- untreated (n = 200). Gene signature classification (e.g., proportion low-, high-risk) was generally well aligned with stratification based on current immunohistochemistry-based clinical practice. Most signatures did not provide any further risk stratification in TNBC and HER2+/ER- disease. Risk classifier agreement (low-, medium/intermediate-, high-risk groups) in ER+ assessment groups was on average 50-60% with occasional pair-wise comparisons having <30% agreement. Disregarding the intermediate-risk groups, the exact agreement between low- and high-risk groups was on average ~80-95%, for risk prediction signatures across all assessment groups. Outcome analyses were restricted to assessment groups of TNBC-ACT and endocrine treated ER+/HER2-/LN- and ER+/HER2-/LN+ cases. For ER+/HER2- disease, gene signatures appear to contribute additional prognostic value even at a relatively short follow-up time. Less apparent prognostic value was observed in the other groups for the tested signatures. The current study supports the usage of gene expression signatures in specific clinical treatment groups within population-based breast cancer. It also stresses the need of further development to reach higher consensus in individual patient classifications, especially for intermediate-risk patients, and the targeting of patients where current gene signatures and prognostic variables provide little support in clinical decision-making.
|
|
