| 1. |
- Abildgaard, Niels, et al.
(författare)
-
Use of Linked Nordic Registries for Population Studies in Hematologic Cancers: The Case of Multiple Myeloma
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Clinical Epidemiology. - : Dove Medical Press. - 1179-1349. ; 15, s. 987-999
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: Linked health-care registries and high coverage in Nordic countries lend themselves well to epidemiologic research. Given its relatively high incidence in Western Europe, complexity in diagnosis, and challenges in registration, multiple myeloma (MM) wasselected to compare registries in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden.Patients and Methods: Data were obtained from four archetypal registries in each country (spanning January 2005–October 2018):National Patient Registry (NPR), Prescribed Drug Registry (PDR), Cancer Registry (CR), and Cause of Death Registry. Patients newlydiagnosed with MM who received MM-specific treatment were included. PDR/NPR treatment records were used to assess incidentNPR cases. The registration quality of MM-specific drugs in the PDR of each country was also evaluated.Results: In Denmark, only 6% of patients in the NPR were not registered in the CR; in Sweden, it was 16.9%. No systematicdifferences were identified that could explain this discrepancy. In Denmark, lenalidomide and bortezomib were registered in the NPRwith high coverage, but less expensive drugs typically given in combination with bortezomib were not covered in any of the registries.In Finland and Sweden, bortezomib records were not identified in the PDR, but some were in the NPR; other drugs had good coveragein the PDR.Conclusions: The registries evaluated in this study can be used to identify the MM population; however, given the gaps in MMregistration in the Finnish and Swedish CRs, Danish registries provide the most comprehensive datasets for research on treatmentpatterns for MM.
|
|
| 3. |
- Nahi, Hareth, et al.
(författare)
-
Proteasome inhibitors and IMiDs can overcome some high-risk cytogenetics in multiple myeloma but not gain 1q21.
- 2016
-
Ingår i: European journal of haematology. - : Wiley. - 1600-0609 .- 0902-4441. ; 96:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Chromosomal aberrations have significant prognostic importance in multiple myeloma (MM). However, proteasome inhibitors (PI) and IMiDs may partly overcome the poor prognostic impact of some of them. In this study, we investigated a population-based consecutive cohort newly diagnosed patients with MM admitted during a defined time period to hospitals in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. The impact of treatment modality on the prognostic importance of specific chromosomal aberration was investigated, with special reference to gain 1q21. The median follow-up of patients still alive at analysis was 40 months for the high-dose (HDT)-treated ones and 29 months for the whole population. Three hundred forty-seven patients with a known 1q21 status were included in this study. The 347 patients were divided into three groups, that is, 119 patients with the 1q21 gain, 105 patients with other aberrations (OA), that is, del(13q), del(17p), t(4,14), and/or (14;16), and 123 patients with no aberrations (NA). The groups were compared in terms of overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and response. The 3-yr OS for patients with gain 1q21 was 60% compared to patients with OA 74% and NO 82% (gain 1q21 vs. NO P < 0.001; gain 1q21 vs. OA P = 0.095). If treated with PI or IMiDs, the 3-yr OS was 58% for patients with gain 1q21 compared to patients with OA 78% and NO 78%, respectively (P = 0.041, P = 0.140). In HDT patients, the 3-yr OS was 69% for patients with gain 1q21 compared to patients with OA 84% and NO 88%, respectively (P < 0.008, P = 0.600). Thus, neither HDT nor using PI or IMiDs could overcome the poor prognostic impact of gain 1q21, while these drugs and HDT seemed to improve OS in patients with OA, approaching the survival in NO. Further, gain 1q21 appears to be one of the most important poor prognostic chromosomal aberrations in multiple myeloma with current treatments. Trials using new drugs or allogeneic transplantation are warranted.
|
|
