| 1. |
- Abildgaard, Niels, et al.
(författare)
-
Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma in Denmark, Finland and Sweden : An analysis using linked Nordic registries
- 2024
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Cancer. - : Elsevier. - 0959-8049 .- 1879-0852. ; 201
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim: The Health outcomes and Understanding of MyelomA multi-National Study (HUMANS) was a large-scale, retrospective study conducted across Denmark, Finland and Sweden using linked data from national registries. We describe the characteristics, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) over 2010–2018.Methods: Patients with NDMM who received MM-specific, first-line treatments, were categorised by treatment (autologous stem cell transplantation [ASCT] or a combination chemotherapy regimen based on bortezomib, lenalidomide or melphalan-prednisolone-thalidomide).Results: 11,023 patients received treatment over 2010–2018. Time between diagnosis and treatment was shortest in Denmark (0.9 months), then Sweden (2.9 months) and Finland (4.6 months). Around one third of patients underwent ASCT. Lenalidomide-based regimens were prescribed to 23–28% of patients in Denmark and Finland, versus 12% in Sweden. Patients receiving lenalidomide had the longest wait for treatment, from 3.2 months (Denmark) to 12.1 months (Sweden). Treatment persistence was highest among patients receiving melphalan-prednisolone-thalidomide (7–8 months) in Finland and Sweden and lowest among those receiving bortezomib (3.5 months) in Finland. Overall survival (OS) was longest among patients with ASCT (7–10 years). Among patients receiving chemotherapy, OS (from diagnosis/treatment initiation), varied between cohorts. In a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with smouldering MM, OS decreased for all; for patients receiving bortezomib or lenalidomide, OS from diagnosis was 40–49 and 27–54 months, respectively.Conclusions: This population-based study of patients with NDMM receiving first-line MM-specific treatment, provides real-world data on treatment patterns and outcomes to complement data from randomised clinical trials.
|
|
| 2. |
- Abildgaard, Niels, et al.
(författare)
-
Use of Linked Nordic Registries for Population Studies in Hematologic Cancers: The Case of Multiple Myeloma
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Clinical Epidemiology. - : Dove Medical Press. - 1179-1349. ; 15, s. 987-999
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: Linked health-care registries and high coverage in Nordic countries lend themselves well to epidemiologic research. Given its relatively high incidence in Western Europe, complexity in diagnosis, and challenges in registration, multiple myeloma (MM) wasselected to compare registries in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden.Patients and Methods: Data were obtained from four archetypal registries in each country (spanning January 2005–October 2018):National Patient Registry (NPR), Prescribed Drug Registry (PDR), Cancer Registry (CR), and Cause of Death Registry. Patients newlydiagnosed with MM who received MM-specific treatment were included. PDR/NPR treatment records were used to assess incidentNPR cases. The registration quality of MM-specific drugs in the PDR of each country was also evaluated.Results: In Denmark, only 6% of patients in the NPR were not registered in the CR; in Sweden, it was 16.9%. No systematicdifferences were identified that could explain this discrepancy. In Denmark, lenalidomide and bortezomib were registered in the NPRwith high coverage, but less expensive drugs typically given in combination with bortezomib were not covered in any of the registries.In Finland and Sweden, bortezomib records were not identified in the PDR, but some were in the NPR; other drugs had good coveragein the PDR.Conclusions: The registries evaluated in this study can be used to identify the MM population; however, given the gaps in MMregistration in the Finnish and Swedish CRs, Danish registries provide the most comprehensive datasets for research on treatmentpatterns for MM.
|
|
| 3. |
- Mellqvist, Ulf-Henrik, et al.
(författare)
-
Bortezomib consolidation after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: a Nordic Myeloma Study Group randomized phase 3 trial
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Blood. - : American Society of Hematology. - 0006-4971 .- 1528-0020. ; 121:23, s. 4647-4654
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Nordic Myeloma Study Group conducted an open randomized trial to compare bortezomib as consolidation therapy given after high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with no consolidation in bortezomib-naive patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Overall, 370 patients were centrally randomly assigned 3 months after ASCT to receive 20 doses of bortezomib given during 21 weeks or no consolidation. The hypothesis was that consolidation therapy would prolong progression-free survival (PFS). The PFS after randomization was 27 months for the bortezomib group compared with 20 months for the control group (P = .05). Fifty-one of 90 patients in the treatment group compared with 32 of 90 controls improved their response after randomization (P = .007). No difference in overall survival was seen. Fatigue was reported more commonly by the bortezomib-treated patients in self-reported quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires, whereas no other major differences in QOL were recorded between the groups. Consolidation therapy seemed to be beneficial for patients not achieving at least a very good partial response (VGPR) but not for patients in the andgt;= VGPR category at randomization. Consolidation with bortezomib after ASCT in bortezomib-naive patients improves PFS without interfering with QOL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00417911.
|
|
| 4. |
- Waage, Anders, et al.
(författare)
-
Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide or placebo in elderly patients with multiple myeloma
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Blood. - : American Society of Hematology. - 0006-4971 .- 1528-0020. ; 116:9, s. 1405-1412
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 363 patients with untreated multiple myeloma were randomized to receive either melphalan-prednisone and thalidomide (MPT) or melphalan-prednisone and placebo (MP). The dose of melphalan was 0.25 mg/kg and prednisone was 100 mg given daily for 4 days every 6 weeks until plateau phase. The dose of thalidomide/placebo was escalated to 400 mg daily until plateau phase and thereafter reduced to 200 mg daily until progression. A total of 357 patients were analyzed. Partial response was 34% and 33%, and very good partial response or better was 23% and 7% in the MPT and MP arms, respectively (P < .001). There was no significant difference in progression-free or overall survival, with median survival being 29 months in the MPT arm and 32 months in the MP arm. Most quality of life outcomes improved equally in both arms, apart from constipation, which was markedly increased in the MPT arm. Constipation, neuropathy, non-neuropathy neurologic toxicity, and skin reactions were significantly more frequent in the MPT arm. The number of thromboembolic events was equal in the 2 treatment arms. In conclusion, MPT had a significant antimyeloma effect, but this did not translate into improved survival. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.
|
|
