| 1. |
- Eliasson, Alf, 1959, et al.
(author)
-
The precision of fit of milled titanium implant frameworks (I-Bridge) in the edentulous jaw.
- 2010
-
In: Clinical implant dentistry and related research. - : Wiley. - 1708-8208 .- 1523-0899. ; 12:2, s. 81-90
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: New computer numeric controlled (CNC)-milled frameworks for implant-supported prostheses have been introduced. However, no data are available on the precision of fit of these new frameworks. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the precision of fit of a new CNC-milled framework technique (I-Bridge, Biomain AB, Helsingborg, Sweden) using Brånemark System (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) and NobelReplace (Nobel Biocare AB) system implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten test frameworks were fabricated for one master model for each implant system. Five additional frameworks were fabricated for five different models simulating clinical cases as controls (Brånemark System). The distortion of implant center point positions was measured in x-, y-, and z-axes and in three dimensions by using a contact-type coordinate measuring machine and a computer program developed specifically for this purpose. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare differences of distortion within and between the groups. RESULTS: The maximal distortion in arch width (x-axis) and curvature (y-axis) was within 71 and 55 microm for all frameworks, respectively. The mean distortion in absolute figures in x-, y-, z-axes and three dimensions was for "clinical control" frameworks 23, 26, 4, and 34 microm as compared with less than 12, 12, 2, and 17 microm for Brånemark and NobelReplace frameworks, respectively. Control frameworks showed significantly (p < .05) greater mean and range of distortions in x- and y-axes and in three dimensions compared with test frameworks. CONCLUSION: All measured frameworks presented signs of misfit, indicating that no framework had a "passive fit." Frameworks produced in a more routine clinical environment seem to present greater levels of distortion as compared with frameworks produced in a strict test situation. However, all measured frameworks presented levels of precision of fit within limits considered to be clinically acceptable in earlier studies of frameworks placed on abutments.
|
|
| 2. |
- Örtorp, Anders, 1964, et al.
(author)
-
Screw preloads and measurements of surface roughness in screw joints: an in vitro study on implant frameworks
- 2005
-
In: Clinical implant dentistry and related research. - 1523-0899. ; 7:3, s. 141-149
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: With the development of milled titanium implant frameworks, new surfaces that have not previously been studied are now being used in screw joints. PURPOSE: The aims of the present study were to compare the preload produced in screw-retained titanium and gold alloy frameworks and the preload for titanium frameworks before and after the application of veneers. Another aim was to try to relate the surface roughness of the screw joints to variations in preload. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten identical titanium and five gold alloy frameworks were fabricated. The gold screws were tightened to 10 Ncm. Preload measurements were made for the gold alloy frameworks and before and after the porcelain or acrylic resin veneers had been applied to the titanium frameworks. Surface roughness measurements were made after preload measurements on the screw joint surfaces of the titanium frameworks and corresponding gold screws. RESULTS: The preloads for the titanium and gold alloy frameworks were similar. Preload in both types of frameworks decreased after repeated torques (p<.05-.01) but was unaffected by the application of veneering materials to the titanium frameworks (p>.05). No relationship (p>.05) between preload and surface roughness characteristics was observed. Loaded titanium framework screw sites, however, had lower mean S(a) values than unloaded sites (p<.001), whereas the surfaces of loaded gold screws had higher mean S(a) values compared with the surfaces of control gold screws (p<.05-.001). CONCLUSION: When using gold screws, milled titanium frameworks have preloads similar to those of gold alloy frameworks and preloads for both decrease after repeated tightening. The preload was similar before and after the veneering of the titanium frameworks. Unloaded milled titanium screw sites had rougher surfaces than loaded, and loaded gold screws had rougher surfaces than unloaded. However, no correlation between screw joint surface and preload was observed for veneered titanium frameworks.
|
|
