| 1. |
- Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos, et al.
(författare)
-
Dental implants in patients with Sjögren's syndrome: a case series and a systematic review
- 2019
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 0901-5027 .- 1399-0020. ; 48:9, s. 1250-1259
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of dental implants in patients with Sjögren's syndrome (SS). The study consisted of two parts: report of a case series and a systematic review of the literature. The results of the clinical series revealed that 19 patients received 107 implants and were followed for a mean of 125 months. Two patients lost three implants (failure rate 2.8%, 3/107). At the last follow-up, there was a mean marginal bone loss (MBL) of −2.190 ± 1.384 mm; estimated MBL after 30 years was 4.39 mm. The review identified 18 studies, resulting in 19 studies for analysis including the present clinical series. A total of 712 implants were placed in 186 patients; 705 implants were followed up for a mean of 72.5 months (failure rate 4.1%, 29/705; failed at a mean time of 12.9 ± 31.7 months). The probability of failure was 2.8% (95% confidence interval 1.6–4.1%). Primary SS patients had a lower implant failure rate (2.5%, 3/118) than secondary SS patients (6.5%, 12/184). In conclusion, dental implants should be considered by dentists as a viable treatment option for patients with SS, as the failure rate is fairly low. SS patients may, however, present a higher MBL around implants than patients from the general population. © 2019 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
|
|
| 2. |
- Gjelvold, Björn, et al.
(författare)
-
Immediate Loading of Single Implants, Guided Surgery, and Intraoral Scanning: A Nonrandomized Study
- 2020
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Prosthodontics. - : Quintessence Publishing. - 0893-2174 .- 1139-9791. ; 33:5, s. 513-522
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: To compare clinical and esthetic outcomes between immediately loaded single implants placed with and without a fully guided surgical procedure. Materials and Methods: Patients with a missing maxillary tooth (second premolar to second premolar) were considered for inclusion in this 1-year prospective nonrandomized study. Exclusion criteria were general health contraindications for oral surgery besides the need for bone grafting or ridge augmentation. One group received digital implant planning, fully guided surgery, and immediate loading (DIL). The other group received freehand surgery and immediate loading (IL). Outcome measures were implant survival, marginal bone loss, soft tissue changes, papilla index, pink and white esthetic scores (PES and WES, respectively), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Results: Two of 21 implants failed in the DIL group soon after placement, resulting in a 1-year implant survival rate of 90.5%, while no implants failed in the IL group. Significantly higher papilla index scores and lower soft tissue changes were found for the DIL group compared to the IL group. No differences were found after 1 year regarding marginal bone loss, PES, WES, or PROMs. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, immediate loading in combination with fully guided surgery might negatively affect implant survival. Immediate loading, fully guided surgery, and a digital workflow appear to have a positive effect on early soft tissue adaptation.
|
|
