SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Wijns W) "

Sökning: WFRF:(Wijns W)

  • Resultat 1-10 av 29
  • [1]23Nästa
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  •  
5.
  •  
6.
  • Byrne, Robert A, et al. (författare)
  • Report of an ESC-EAPCI Task Force on the evaluation and use of bioresorbable scaffolds for percutaneous coronary intervention : executive summary
  • 2018
  • Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : EUROPA EDITION. - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 13:13, s. 1574-1586
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • A previous Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) provided a report on recommendations for the non-clinical and clinical evaluation of coronary stents. Following dialogue with the European Commission, the Task Force was asked to prepare an additional report on the class of devices known as bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS). Five BRS have CE-mark approval for use in Europe. Only one device-the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold-has published randomized clinical trial data and this data show inferior outcomes to conventional drug-eluting stents (DES) at 2-3 years. For this reason, at present BRS should not be preferred to conventional DES in clinical practice. The Task Force recommends that new BRS devices should undergo systematic non-clinical testing according to standardized criteria prior to evaluation in clinical studies. A clinical evaluation plan should include data from a medium sized, randomized trial against DES powered for a surrogate end point of clinical efficacy. Manufacturers of successful devices receive CE-mark approval for use and must have an approved plan for a large-scale randomized clinical trial with planned long-term follow-up.
  •  
7.
  • Lenzen, M., et al. (författare)
  • Pharmacological treatment and perceived health status during 1-year follow up in patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease, but ineligible for revascularization. Results from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization
  • 2006
  • Ingår i: European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. - 1474-5151 .- 1873-1953. ; 5:2, s. 115-121
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Background: It has been recognized that a clinically significant portion of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) continue to experience anginal and other related symptoms that are refractory to the combination of medical therapy and revascularization. The Euro Heart Survey on Revascularization (EHSCR) provided an opportunity to assess pharmacological treatment and outcome in patients with proven CAD who were ineligible for revascularization. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of EHS-CR data. After excluding patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and those in whom revascularization was not indicated, 4409 patients remained in the analyses. We selected two groups: (1) patients in whom revascularization was the preferred treatment option (n = 3777, 86%), and (2) patients who were considered ineligible for revascularization (n = 632, 14%). Results: Patient ineligible for revascularization had a worse risk profile, more often had a total occlusion (59% vs. 37%, p < 0.001), were treated more often with ACE-inhibitors (65% vs. 55%, p < 0.001) but less likely with aspirin (83% vs. 88%, p < 0.001). Overall, they had higher case-fatality at 1-year (7.0% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). Regarding self-perceived health status, measured via the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire, these same patients reported more problems on all dimensions of the EQ-5D. Furthermore, in the revascularization group we observed an increase between discharge and 1-year follow up (utility score from 0.85 to 1.00) whereas patients ineligible for revascularization did not improve over time (utility score remained 0.80). Conclusion: In this large cohort of European patients with CAD, those considered ineligible for revascularization had more co-morbidities and risk factors, and scored worse on self-perceived health status as compared to revascularized patients in the revascularization group. With the exception of ACE-inhibitors and aspirin, there were no major differences regarding drug treatment between the two groups. Given these clinically significant observations, there appears to be a role for nurse-led, multidisciplinary, rehabilitation teams that target clinically vulnerable patients whose symptoms remain refractory to standard medical care. © 2006 European Society of Cardiology.
  •  
8.
  •  
9.
  •  
10.
  • Bassand, Jean-Pierre, et al. (författare)
  • Guía de Práctica Clínica para el diagnóstico y tratamiento del síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST
  • 2007
  • Ingår i: Revista Española de Cardiología. - 0300-8932 .- 1579-2242. ; 60:10, s. 1070-1080
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • El contenido de estas Guías de Práctica Clínica de la Sociedad Europea de Cardiología (ESC) ha sido publicado para uso exclusivamente personal y educativo. No está autorizado su uso comercial. No se permite la traducción o reproducción en ningún formato de las Guías de la ESC ni de ninguna de sus partes sin un permiso escrito de la ESC. El permiso puede obtenerse enviando una solicitud por escrito a Oxford University Press, la editorial del European Heart Journal, y parte autorizada para gestionar esos permisos en representación de la ESC.  
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 29
  • [1]23Nästa
 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy