| 1. |
- Westin, Jerker, et al.
(author)
-
A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for duodenal levodopa infusion
- 2007
-
In: Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. - Amsterdam, Netherlands. ; , s. S102-S103
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective Levodopa in presence of decarboxylase inhibitors is following two-compartment kinetics and its effect is typically modelled using sigmoid Emax models. Pharmacokinetic modelling of the absorption phase of oral distributions is problematic because of irregular gastric emptying. The purpose of this work was to identify and estimate a population pharmacokinetic- pharmacodynamic model for duodenal infusion of levodopa/carbidopa (Duodopa®) that can be used for in numero simulation of treatment strategies. Methods The modelling involved pooling data from two studies and fixing some parameters to values found in literature (Chan et al. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2005 Aug;32(3-4):307-31). The first study involved 12 patients on 3 occasions and is described in Nyholm et al. Clinical Neuropharmacology 2003:26:156-63. The second study, PEDAL, involved 3 patients on 2 occasions. A bolus dose (normal morning dose plus 50%) was given after a washout during night. Plasma samples and motor ratings (clinical assessment of motor function from video recordings on a treatment response scale between -3 and 3, where -3 represents severe parkinsonism and 3 represents severe dyskinesia.) were repeatedly collected until the clinical effect was back at baseline. At this point, the usual infusion rate was started and sampling continued for another two hours. Different structural absorption models and effect models were evaluated using the value of the objective function in the NONMEM package. Population mean parameter values, standard error of estimates (SE) and if possible, interindividual/interoccasion variability (IIV/IOV) were estimated. Results Our results indicate that Duodopa absorption can be modelled with an absorption compartment with an added bioavailability fraction and a lag time. The most successful effect model was of sigmoid Emax type with a steep Hill coefficient and an effect compartment delay. Estimated parameter values are presented in the table. Conclusions The absorption and effect models were reasonably successful in fitting observed data and can be used in simulation experiments.
|
|
| 2. |
- Westin, Jerker, 1971-, et al.
(author)
-
A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for duodenal levodopa infusion
- 2011
-
In: Clinical neuropharmacology. - Lippincott : Williams & Wilkins. - 0362-5664 .- 1537-162X. ; 34:2, s. 61-65
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: The purpose of this work was to identify and estimate a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for duodenal infusion of a levodopa/carbidopa gel (Duodopa) to examine pharmacological properties of this treatment. Methods: The modeling involved pooling data from 3 studies (on advanced Parkinson disease) and fixing some parameters to values found in literature. The first study involved 12 patients studied on 3 occasions each and was previously published. The second study involved 3 patients on 2 occasions. A bolus dose was given after a washout during night. Plasma samples and motor ratings (clinical assessment of motor function on a 7-point treatment response scale ranging from "very off" to "very hyperkinetic") were collected until the clinical effect returned to baseline. The third study involved 5 patients on 3 occasions receiving 5 different dose levels. Different structural models were evaluated using the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling program NONMEM VI. Population mean parameter values, and interindividual, interoccasion, and residual variabilities were estimated. Results: Absorption of the levodopa/carbidopa gel can be adequately described with first-order absorption with bioavailability and lag time. Estimated population parameter values were a mean absorption time of 28.5 minutes, a lag time of 2.9 minutes, and a bioavailability of 88%. The pharmacodynamic model for motor ratings had the following population values: a half-life of effect delay of 21 minutes, a concentration at 50% effect of 1.55 mg/L, an E-max of 2.39 U on the treatment response scale, and a sigmoidicity of the E-max function of 11.6. Conclusions: For the typical unmedicated subject, it will take 51.4 minutes until the peak levodopa effect is reached after a bolus dose. This delay is, like the magnitude of the effect, highly variable in this patient group. The residual error magnitudes of 20% for levodopa concentrations and 0.92 U (SD) for motor ratings indicate that the models developed provide predictions of a relevant quality. The developed model may be a first step toward model-guided treatment individualization of duodenal infusion of levodopa.
|
|
| 3. |
- Westin, Jerker, et al.
(author)
-
Pedal : identification of models for duodenal administration of levodopa
- 2006
-
In: European Journal of Neurology. - Glasgow, UK. ; , s. 220-21
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Backgound and aims: The main purpose of the PEDAL study is to identify and estimate sample individual pharmacokinetic- pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models for duodenal infusion of levodopa/carbidopa (Duodopa®) that can be used for in numero simulation of treatment strategies. Other objectives are to study the absorption of Duodopa® and to form a basis for power calculation for a future larger study. PK/PD based on oral levodopa is problematic because of irregular gastric emptying. Preliminary work with data from [Gundert-Remy U et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1983;25:69-72] suggested that levodopa infusion pharmacokinetics can be described by a two-compartment model. Background research led to a hypothesis for an effect model incorporating concentration-unrelated fluctuations, more complex than standard E-max models. Methods: PEDAL involved a few patients already on Duodopa®. A bolus dose (normal morning dose plus 50%) was given after a washout during night. Data collection continued until the clinical effect was back at baseline. The procedure was repeated on two non-consecutive days per patient. The following data were collected in 5 to 15 minutes intervals: i) Accelerometer data. ii) Three e-diary questions about ability to walk, feelings of “off” and “dyskinesia”. iii) Clinical assessment of motor function by a physician. iv) Plasma concentrations of levodopa, carbidopa and the metabolite 3-O-methyldopa. The main effect variable will be the clinical assessment. Results: At date of abstract submission, lab analyses were currently being performed. Modelling results, simulation experiments and conclusions will be presented in our poster.
|
|
