| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Eckel-Passow, Jeanette, et al.
(författare)
-
USING GERMLINE VARIANTS TO PREDICT GLIOMA RISK AND IDENTIFY GLIOMA SUBTYPE PRE-OPERATIVELY
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Neuro-Oncology. - : OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC. - 1522-8517 .- 1523-5866. ; 20, s. 82-82
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- To date, 25 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been shown to be associated with overall glioma risk or with risk of specific subtypes of glioma. We hypothesized that the inclusion of these 25 SNPs with patient age at diagnosis and sex could predict risk of glioma as well as predict IDH mutation status. Thus, case-control design and multinomial logistic regression were used to develop models to estimate the risk of glioma development while accounting for molecular subtypes. Case-case design and logistic regression were used to develop models to predict IDH mutation status. Each model included all 25 glioma risk SNPs, patient age at diagnosis and sex. A total of 1273 glioma cases and 443 controls from Mayo Clinic were used in the discovery set, and 852 glioma cases and 231 controls from UCSF were used in the validation set. All samples were genotyped using a custom Illumina OncoArray. We observed that patients in the highest 5% of the risk score had more than a 14-fold increased relative risk of developing an IDH-mutant glioma, compared to patients with median risk score. Large differences in lifetime absolute risk were observed at the extremes of the risk score percentile categories. For both IDH-mutated 1p/19q non-codeleted glioma and IDH-mutated 1p/19q-codeleted glioma, the lifetime risk increased from almost null to 2.3% and almost null to 1.7%, respectively. The SNP-based model that predicted IDH mutation status had a validation c-index of 0.85. These results suggest that germline genotyping has the potential to provide a new tool for clinicians for the initial management of newly-discovered brain lesions. Specifically, given the low lifetime risk of glioma, SNP-based risk scores should not be useful for general population screening. However, with further research these risk scores may be useful in certain clinically-defined high-risk groups.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Ostrom, Quinn, et al.
(författare)
-
PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED COMMON GLIOMA RISK SNPs ARE ASSOCIATED WITH FAMILIAL GLIOMA
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Neuro-Oncology. - : OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC. - 1522-8517 .- 1523-5866. ; 20, s. 108-108
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of gliomas occur in individuals with a family history of glioma, and first-degree relatives of brain tumor cases have a two-fold increase in risk of brain tumor. Family-based studies have had little success in identifying high penetrance risk variants. Recent somatic characterization has shown that tumors from familial cases are indistinguishable from sporadic cases, suggesting that familial cases may arise through similar mechanisms of gliomagenesis, and therefore may be associated with common variants as well as rare mutations. In this analysis, we assessed whether previously identified common risk variants are associated with familial glioma. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Glioma International Case Control (GICC) Study for 447 familial cases and 3,286 controls. We assessed 25 risk loci previously identified by glioma GWAS, and odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using an additive genetic logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, and the first principal component. Results were considered significant at p TERT, EGFR, CCDC26, CDKN2B, TP53, and RTEL1. The strongest association was at rs55705857 (CCDC26, OR=2.5, p=1.14x10-14). These SNPs were further examined using a caseonly approach comparing familial to non-familial cases, and there was no significant difference in allele frequencies by family history status. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis we identified a significant association between familial glioma and six common risk variants previously identified by glioma GWAS. This provides further evidence of shared pathways of genetic risk and gliomagenesis between familial and non-familial glioma. Further exploration is necessary to determine the overall contribution of common genetic variation to risk of familial glioma.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
