| 1. |
- van Bunderen, Christa C., et al.
(author)
-
Efficacy and safety of growth hormone treatment in adults with growth hormone deficiency: a systematic review of studies on morbidity
- 2014
-
In: Clinical Endocrinology. - : Wiley. - 1365-2265 .- 0300-0664. ; 81:1, s. 1-14
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Due to the positive effects demonstrated in randomized clinical trials on cardiovascular surrogate markers and bone metabolism, a positive effect of growth hormone (GH) treatment on clinically relevant end-points seems feasible. In this review, we discuss the long-term efficacy and safety of GH treatment in adult patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) with emphasis on morbidity: fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) and stroke, fractures, fatal and nonfatal malignancies and recurrences, and diabetes mellitus. A positive effect of GH treatment on CVD and fracture risk could be concluded, but study design limitations have to be considered. Stroke and secondary brain tumours remained more prevalent. However, other contributing factors have to be taken into account. Regrowth and recurrences of (peri) pituitary tumours were not increased in patients with GH treatment compared to similar patients without GH treatment. All fatal and nonfatal malignancies were not more prevalent in GH-treated adults compared to the general population. However, follow-up time is still relatively short. The studies on diabetes are difficult to interpret, and more evidence is awaited. In clinical practice, a more individualized assessment seems appropriate, taking into consideration the underlying diagnosis of GHD, other treatment regimens, metabolic profile and the additional beneficial effects of GH set against the possible risks. Large and thoroughly conducted observational studies are needed and seem the only feasible way to inform the ongoing debate on health care costs, drug safety and clinical outcomes.
|
|
| 2. |
- Bunderen, Christa C. van, et al.
(author)
-
Meta-analysis of mortality in adults with growth hormone deficiency: Does growth hormone replacement therapy really improve mortality rates?
- 2023
-
In: BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM. - 1521-690X .- 1532-1908. ; 37:6
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is one of the most prevalent deficiencies in patients with hypopituitarism and several cohort studies have demonstrated an increased mortality risk in hypopituitary pa-tients with a presumed GHD. The cause of the excess mortality is most likely multifactorial, including the etiology of the hypopituitarism, non-physiological replacement therapies (mostly glucocorticoid), tumor treatment and its side effects as well as untreated GHD. Several years later, other cohort studies that investigated life expectancy in patients with hypopituitarism on GH replacement therapy (GHRT) that showed a normalized mortality. By comparison of the distribution of char-acteristics of interest between cohorts, we discuss the existing literature to answer the following question: does growth hormone replacement really improve mortality rates in adult patients with hypopituitarism and GHD? We also conducted a meta-analysis of these studies. Since the literature suffers from selection and time bias (improvement of tumor management and other pituitary hormone replacement therapies), there is no high-quality evidence that replacement therapy for GHD really improves mortality. However, the available data does suggest that GHRT plays a significant part in the normalization of the mortality in patients with hypopituitarism.
|
|
| 3. |
- van Bunderen, Christa C, et al.
(author)
-
Growth hormone deficiency and replacement therapy in adults: Impact on survival.
- 2021
-
In: Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1573-2606 .- 1389-9155. ; 22, s. 125-133
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- In a seminal paper from 1990, Rosen and Bengtsson suggested that hypopituitary patients with a presumed growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) have an excess mortality. Later studies have confirmed this finding but have also shown that the cause of the increased risk of death in these patients is multifactorial, including unreplaced GHD as well as non-physiological replacement therapy of other deficiencies, the etiology of hypopituitarism, and the side effects of tumor treatment. Only a few studies have investigated mortality in hypopituitary patients with GHD receiving GH replacement therapy (GHRT): these studies are retrospective observational studies with a wide range of underlying diseases but most of them show a mortality that is not different from the general population. Even though the research field of survival in GHD patients with and without GHRT is lacking prospective randomized trials, the evidence suggests that GHD in hypopituitary patients contributes to an excess mortality and modern replacement therapy including GHRT will result in a mortality that is approaching normal. Herein, we review the literature in the field of survival in GHD patients with and without GHRT. In addition, we outline the most important issues when evaluating studies in this area.
|
|
| 4. |
- van Bunderen, Christa C, et al.
(author)
-
Personalized approach to growth hormone replacement in adults.
- 2019
-
In: Archives of endocrinology and metabolism. - : Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism. - 2359-4292 .- 2359-3997. ; 63:6, s. 592-600
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) in adults is well-characterized and includes abnormal body composition, reduced bone mass, an adverse cardiovascular risk profile, and impaired quality of life. In the early 1990s, it was also shown that patients with hypopituitarism without GH replacement therapy (GHRT) had excess mortality. Today, GHRT has been shown to decrease or reverse the negative effects of GHD. In addition, recent papers have shown that mortality and morbidity are approaching normal in hypopituitary patients with GHD who receive modern endocrine therapy including GHRT. Since the first dose-finding studies, it has been clear that efficacy and side effects differ substantially between patients. Many factors have been suggested as affecting responsiveness, such as sex, age, age at GHD onset, adherence, and GH receptor polymorphisms, with sex and sex steroid replacement having the greatest impact. Therefore, the individual tailoring of GH dose is of great importance to achieve sufficient efficacy without side effects. One group that stands out is women receiving oral estrogen replacement, who needs the highest dose. Serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) is still the most used biochemical biomarker for GH dose titration, although the best serum IGF-1 target is still debated. Patients with GHD due to acromegaly, Cushing's disease, or craniopharyngioma experience similar effects from GHRT as others. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(6):592-600.
|
|
