SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Alfonso Fernando) srt2:(2020)"

Sökning: WFRF:(Alfonso Fernando) > (2020)

  • Resultat 1-3 av 3
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Bajraktari, Gani, et al. (författare)
  • Complete revascularization for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after the COMPLETE trial : a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
  • 2020
  • Ingår i: IJC Heart & Vasculature. - : Elsevier. - 2352-9067. ; 29
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Background: The recently published COMPLETE trial has demonstrated that patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD), who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of both culprit and non-culprit (vs. culprit-only) lesions had a reduced risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), but not of cardiovascular or total mortality. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of complete revascularization on cardiovascular or total mortality reduction using available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including the COMPLETE trial, in hemodynamically stable STEMI patients with MVD. Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov databases search identified 10 RCTs of 7033 patients with STEMI and MVD which compared complete (n = 3420) vs. only culprit lesion (n = 3613) PCI for a median 27.7 months follow-up. Random effect risk ratios were used to estimate for efficacy and safety outcomes. Results: Complete revascularization reduced the risk of MACE (10.4% vs.16.6%; RR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.74, p < 0.0001), CV mortality (2.87% vs. 3.72%; RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.95, p = 0.02), reinfarction (5.1% vs. 7.1%; RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.86, p = 0.002), urgent revascularization (7.92% vs.17.4%; RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.73, p < 0.001), and CV hospitalization (8.68% vs.11.4%; RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44to 0.96, p = 0.03) compared with culprit only revascularization. All-cause mortality, stroke, major bleeding events, or contrast induced nephropathy were not affected by the revascularization strategy. Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that in patients with STEMI and MVD, complete revascularization is superior to culprit-only PCI in reducing the risk of MACE outcomes, including cardiovascular mortality, without increasing the risk of adverse safety outcomes.
  •  
2.
  • Bajraktari, Gani, et al. (författare)
  • Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Treated with Percutaneous Angioplasty versus Bypass Grafting : A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
  • 2020
  • Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Medicine. - : MDPI. - 2077-0383. ; 9:7
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Background and Aim: Treatment of patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with unprotected LMCA treated randomly by PCI or CABG. Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov database searches identified five randomized trials (RCTs) including 4499 patients with unprotected LMCA comparing PCI (n= 2249) vs. CABG (n= 2250), with a minimum clinical follow-up of five years. Random effect risk ratios were used for efficacy and safety outcomes. The study was registered in PROSPERO. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction or stroke. Results: Compared to CABG, patients assigned to PCI had a similar rate of MACE (risk ratio (RR): 1.13; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.36;p= 0.19), myocardial infarction (RR: 1.48; 95% CI: 0.97 to 2.25;p= 0.07) and stroke (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.23;p= 0.42). Additionally, all-cause mortality (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.28;p= 0.48) and cardiovascular (CV) mortality (RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.43;p= 0.31) were not different. However, the risk of any repeat revascularization (RR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.34 to 2.15;p< 0.00001) was higher in patients assigned to PCI. Conclusions: The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that the long-term survival and MACE of patients who underwent PCI for unprotected LMCA stenosis were comparable to those receiving CABG, despite a higher rate of repeat revascularization.
  •  
3.
  • Licea Jimenez, Liliana, 1977, et al. (författare)
  • Polymer Coatings Based on Nanocomposites
  • 2020
  • Ingår i: Polymer Coatings Technologies and Applications. - : CRC Press. - 9780429199226 ; , s. 31-52
  • Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
    • In particular, the development of polymeric nanocomposites has become an opportunity to meet the demands of functional materials. Polymer nanocomposites offer the possibility of new materials with a unique manifold of structure-property relationships. The formulation strategy of polymer coatings based on nanocomposites depends on the application and different approaches can be followed. In organic photovoltaics, the most important component is the active layer, which basically is a conjugated polymer nanocomposite coating. The development and design of polymer nanocomposites-enabled coatings has gained research importance as they offer the promise of incremental and disruptive improvements to products and processes. Polymer nanocomposite coatings represent properties with incredible practical applications for mechanical, optical, and electronic products. Over the last decades, the role of functional coatings has considerably changed. Polymer coating technology has evolved by the increase in scientific and technological understanding of important principles. Polymer coatings based on nanocomposites offer significant product performance and cost-saving advantages with functional features.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-3 av 3

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy