| 1. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2015
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 2. |
- Bohm, M., et al.
(författare)
-
Twenty-four-hour heart rate lowering with ivabradine in chronic heart failure: insights from the SHIFT Holter substudy
- 2015
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Heart Failure. - : Wiley. - 1388-9842. ; 17:5, s. 518-26
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIMS: Analysis of 24-h Holter recordings was a pre-specified substudy of SHIFT (Systolic Heart Failure Treatment with the If Inhibitor Ivabradine Trial) for exploring the heart rhythm safety of ivabradine and to determine effects of ivabradine on 24-h, daytime, and night-time heart rate (HR) compared with resting office HR. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 24-h Holter monitoring was performed at baseline and 8 months after randomization to ivabradine (n = 298) or matching placebo (n = 304) titrated maximally to 7.5 mg b.i.d. in patients with baseline HR >/=70 b.p.m. Patients received guideline-based optimized heart failure therapy including ACE inhibitors and/or ARBs in 93% and beta-blockers at maximally tolerated doses in 93%. After 8 months, HR over 24 h decreased by 9.5 +/- 10.0 b.p.m. with ivabradine, from 75.4 +/- 10.3 b.p.m. (P < 0.0001), and by 1.2 +/- 8.9 b.p.m. with placebo, from 74.8 +/- 9.7 b.p.m. (P < 0.0001 for difference vs. ivabradine). HR reduction with ivabradine was similar in resting office and in 24-h, awake, and asleep recordings, with beneficial effects on HR variability and no meaningful increases in supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias. At 8 months, 21.3% on ivabradine vs. 8.5% on placebo had >/=1 episode of HR <40 b.p.m. (P < 0.0001). No episode of HR <30 b.p.m. was recorded; 3 (1.2%) patients had RR intervals >2.5 s on ivabradine vs. 4 (1.6%) patients on placebo. No RR intervals >3 s were identified in patients taking ivabradine. CONCLUSION: Ivabradine safely and significantly lowers HR and improves HR variability in patients with systolic heart failure, without inducing significant bradycardia, ventricular arrhythmias, or supraventricular arrhythmias.
|
|
| 3. |
- Bohm, M., et al.
(författare)
-
Influence of Cardiovascular and Noncardiovascular Co-morbidities on Outcomes and Treatment Effect of Heart Rate Reduction With Ivabradine in Stable Heart Failure (from the SHIFT Trial)
- 2015
-
Ingår i: The American journal of cardiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0002-9149 .- 1879-1913. ; 116:12, s. 1890-7
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Incidence of chronic heart failure (HF) increases with age and cardiovascular (CV) morbidity. Co-morbidities increase hospitalization and mortality in HF, and non-CV co-morbidities may lead to preventable hospitalizations. We studied the impact of co-morbidities on mortality and morbidity in Systolic Heart Failure Treatment with the If Inhibitor Ivabradine Trial, and investigated whether the impact of ivabradine was affected by co-morbidities. We analyzed the Systolic Heart Failure Treatment with the If Inhibitor Ivabradine Trialpopulation, with moderate-to-severe HF and left ventricular dysfunction (in sinus rhythm with heart rate at rest >/=70 beats/min), according to co-morbidity: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, anemia, stroke, impaired renal function, myocardial infarction, hypertension, and peripheral artery disease. Co-morbidity load was classed as 0, 1, 2, 3, 4+ or 1 to 2 co-morbidities, or 3+ co-morbidities. Co-morbidities were evenly distributed between the placebo and ivabradine groups. Patients with more co-morbidities were likely to be older, women, had more advanced HF, were less likely to be on beta blockers, with an even distribution on ivabradine 2.5, 5, or 7.5 mg bid and placebo at all co-morbidity loads. Number of co-morbidities was related to outcomes. Cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization events significantly increased (p <0.0001) with co-morbidity load, with the most events in patients with >3 co-morbidities for both, ivabradine and placebo. There was no interaction between co-morbidity load and the treatment effects of ivabradine. Hospitalization rate was lower at all co-morbidity loads for ivabradine. In conclusion, cardiac and noncardiac co-morbidities significantly affect CV outcomes, particularly if there are >3 co-morbidities. The effect of heart rate reduction with ivabradine is maintained at all co-morbidity loads.
|
|
| 4. |
- Mancini, G. B. J., et al.
(författare)
-
Pharmacologic Options for the Management of Systolic Heart Failure: Examining Underlying Mechanisms
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Canadian Journal of Cardiology. - : Pulsus Group Inc.. - 0828-282X. ; 31:10, s. 1282-1292
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- The optimal management of systolic heart failure includes combination therapy to influence myocardial remodelling favourably by affecting neurohormonal activation and underlying maladaptive pathophysiological pathways. These medications include modulators of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (eg, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) and β-adrenergic receptor blockers. In addition, an agent with a distinct and complementary mechanism of bradycardic action, the selective pacemaker-current (If) inhibitor ivabradine, provides further reduction of heart rate. Also, a new drug that incorporates neprilysin inhibition combined with angiotensin receptor blockade shows incremental effectiveness. The primary goal of this review is to provide a mechanistic explanation of the complementary role of therapeutic interventions in modulating pathways leading to progressive systolic heart failure. A secondary goal is to summarize the key findings of the pivotal clinical trials that have demonstrated the efficacy of these agents in this population. © 2015 Canadian Cardiovascular Society.
|
|
